Sovereign Credit Rating Mismatches

We study the factors behind ratings mismatches in sovereign credit ratings from different agencies, for the period 1980‑‑2015. Using random effects ordered and simple probit approaches, we find that structural balances and the existence of a default in the last ten years were the least significant v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: António Afonso, André Albuquerque
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Coimbra University Press 2018-07-01
Series:Notas Económicas
Subjects:
Online Access:https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/notaseconomicas/article/view/5961
_version_ 1828495750541082624
author António Afonso
André Albuquerque
author_facet António Afonso
André Albuquerque
author_sort António Afonso
collection DOAJ
description We study the factors behind ratings mismatches in sovereign credit ratings from different agencies, for the period 1980‑‑2015. Using random effects ordered and simple probit approaches, we find that structural balances and the existence of a default in the last ten years were the least significant variables. In addition, the level of net debt, budget balances, GDP per capita and the existence of a default in the last five years were found to be the most relevant variables for rating mismatches across agencies. For speculative‑‑grade ratings, a default in the last two or five years decreases the rating difference between S&P and Fitch. For the positive rating difference between S&P and Moody’s, and for investment‑‑grade ratings, an increase in external debt leads to a smaller rating gap between the two agencies.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T12:18:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9386198a0290470a93cadc8f37b22f3d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0872-4733
2183-203X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T12:18:15Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Coimbra University Press
record_format Article
series Notas Económicas
spelling doaj.art-9386198a0290470a93cadc8f37b22f3d2022-12-22T01:07:36ZengCoimbra University PressNotas Económicas0872-47332183-203X2018-07-014610.14195/2183-203X_46_3Sovereign Credit Rating MismatchesAntónio Afonso0André Albuquerque1ISEG - UL, Universidade de Lisboa REM - Research in Economics and Mathematics UECE - Research Unit on Complexity and EconomicsISEG - UL, Universidade de LisboaWe study the factors behind ratings mismatches in sovereign credit ratings from different agencies, for the period 1980‑‑2015. Using random effects ordered and simple probit approaches, we find that structural balances and the existence of a default in the last ten years were the least significant variables. In addition, the level of net debt, budget balances, GDP per capita and the existence of a default in the last five years were found to be the most relevant variables for rating mismatches across agencies. For speculative‑‑grade ratings, a default in the last two or five years decreases the rating difference between S&P and Fitch. For the positive rating difference between S&P and Moody’s, and for investment‑‑grade ratings, an increase in external debt leads to a smaller rating gap between the two agencies.https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/notaseconomicas/article/view/5961Sovereign ratingssplit ratingspanel datarandom effects ordered probit
spellingShingle António Afonso
André Albuquerque
Sovereign Credit Rating Mismatches
Notas Económicas
Sovereign ratings
split ratings
panel data
random effects ordered probit
title Sovereign Credit Rating Mismatches
title_full Sovereign Credit Rating Mismatches
title_fullStr Sovereign Credit Rating Mismatches
title_full_unstemmed Sovereign Credit Rating Mismatches
title_short Sovereign Credit Rating Mismatches
title_sort sovereign credit rating mismatches
topic Sovereign ratings
split ratings
panel data
random effects ordered probit
url https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/notaseconomicas/article/view/5961
work_keys_str_mv AT antonioafonso sovereigncreditratingmismatches
AT andrealbuquerque sovereigncreditratingmismatches