Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis

(1) Background: Laser-assisted refractive surgery is a safe and effective surgical correction of refractive error. For most patients, both the newer Trans-PRK and the established LASIK technique can produce the required surgical correction, sparking the question of which technique should be opted fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul Filip Curcă, Cătălina Ioana Tătaru, George Sima, Marian Burcea, Călin Petru Tătaru
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/5/481
_version_ 1797264655699148800
author Paul Filip Curcă
Cătălina Ioana Tătaru
George Sima
Marian Burcea
Călin Petru Tătaru
author_facet Paul Filip Curcă
Cătălina Ioana Tătaru
George Sima
Marian Burcea
Călin Petru Tătaru
author_sort Paul Filip Curcă
collection DOAJ
description (1) Background: Laser-assisted refractive surgery is a safe and effective surgical correction of refractive error. For most patients, both the newer Trans-PRK and the established LASIK technique can produce the required surgical correction, sparking the question of which technique should be opted for. (2) Methods: The study prospectively evaluated 121 patients (230 eyes) for at least one month postoperatively; 66 patients (126 eyes) and 45 patients (85 eyes) returned for 6 months and 1 year follow-up. (3) Results: No statistical difference was recorded at 1 week or 1 month post-operation. At 6 months, a difference was found for spherical diopters (Trans-PRK −0.0476 ± 0.7012 versus FS-LASIK +0.425 ± 0.874, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and spherical equivalent (Trans-PRK −0.1994 ± 0.0294 versus FS-LASIK +0.225 ± 0.646, <i>p</i> = 0.025) but not for CYL D (Trans-PRK −0.3036 ± 0.5251 versus FS-LASIK −0.4 ± 0.820, <i>p</i> = 0.499). Uncorrected visual acuity was better for Trans-PRK 6 months post-operation (UCVA logMAR 0.02523 versus 0.0768 logMAR; <i>p</i> = 0.015 logMAR). At 1-year, Trans-PRK was favored for spherical diopters (Trans-PRK −0.0294 ± 0.6493 versus FS-LASIK +0.646 ± 0.909, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and spherical equivalent (Trans-PRK −0.218 ± 0.784 versus FS-LASIK 0.372 ± 1.08, <i>p</i> = 0.007). Overall speed in visual recovery, variance of results and surgically induced astigmatism were in favor of Trans-PRK. (4) Conclusions: The study reported improvements for Trans-PRK patients, with both techniques found to be safe and effective.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T00:32:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-938803e290f04049b58ddd12846b1632
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T00:32:21Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-938803e290f04049b58ddd12846b16322024-03-12T16:41:54ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182024-02-0114548110.3390/diagnostics14050481Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ KeratomileusisPaul Filip Curcă0Cătălina Ioana Tătaru1George Sima2Marian Burcea3Călin Petru Tătaru4Clinical Department of Ophthalmology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, RomaniaClinical Department of Ophthalmology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, RomaniaClinical Department of Ophthalmology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, RomaniaClinical Department of Ophthalmology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, RomaniaClinical Department of Ophthalmology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania(1) Background: Laser-assisted refractive surgery is a safe and effective surgical correction of refractive error. For most patients, both the newer Trans-PRK and the established LASIK technique can produce the required surgical correction, sparking the question of which technique should be opted for. (2) Methods: The study prospectively evaluated 121 patients (230 eyes) for at least one month postoperatively; 66 patients (126 eyes) and 45 patients (85 eyes) returned for 6 months and 1 year follow-up. (3) Results: No statistical difference was recorded at 1 week or 1 month post-operation. At 6 months, a difference was found for spherical diopters (Trans-PRK −0.0476 ± 0.7012 versus FS-LASIK +0.425 ± 0.874, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and spherical equivalent (Trans-PRK −0.1994 ± 0.0294 versus FS-LASIK +0.225 ± 0.646, <i>p</i> = 0.025) but not for CYL D (Trans-PRK −0.3036 ± 0.5251 versus FS-LASIK −0.4 ± 0.820, <i>p</i> = 0.499). Uncorrected visual acuity was better for Trans-PRK 6 months post-operation (UCVA logMAR 0.02523 versus 0.0768 logMAR; <i>p</i> = 0.015 logMAR). At 1-year, Trans-PRK was favored for spherical diopters (Trans-PRK −0.0294 ± 0.6493 versus FS-LASIK +0.646 ± 0.909, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and spherical equivalent (Trans-PRK −0.218 ± 0.784 versus FS-LASIK 0.372 ± 1.08, <i>p</i> = 0.007). Overall speed in visual recovery, variance of results and surgically induced astigmatism were in favor of Trans-PRK. (4) Conclusions: The study reported improvements for Trans-PRK patients, with both techniques found to be safe and effective.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/5/481Trans-PRKLASIKversustransepithelial photorefractive keratomileusis
spellingShingle Paul Filip Curcă
Cătălina Ioana Tătaru
George Sima
Marian Burcea
Călin Petru Tătaru
Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis
Diagnostics
Trans-PRK
LASIK
versus
transepithelial photorefractive keratomileusis
title Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis
title_full Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis
title_fullStr Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis
title_full_unstemmed Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis
title_short Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis
title_sort advances in transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus laser assisted in situ keratomileusis
topic Trans-PRK
LASIK
versus
transepithelial photorefractive keratomileusis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/5/481
work_keys_str_mv AT paulfilipcurca advancesintransepithelialphotorefractivekeratectomyversuslaserassistedinsitukeratomileusis
AT catalinaioanatataru advancesintransepithelialphotorefractivekeratectomyversuslaserassistedinsitukeratomileusis
AT georgesima advancesintransepithelialphotorefractivekeratectomyversuslaserassistedinsitukeratomileusis
AT marianburcea advancesintransepithelialphotorefractivekeratectomyversuslaserassistedinsitukeratomileusis
AT calinpetrutataru advancesintransepithelialphotorefractivekeratectomyversuslaserassistedinsitukeratomileusis