Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of GDHT on post-operative pulmonary complications

Abstract Background Perioperative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT), defined as the administration of fluids with or without inotropes or vasoactive agents against explicit measured goals to augment blood flow, has been evaluated in many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) over the past four...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahilanandan Dushianthan, Martin Knight, Peter Russell, Michael PW Grocott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:Perioperative Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13741-020-00161-5
_version_ 1828786149180571648
author Ahilanandan Dushianthan
Martin Knight
Peter Russell
Michael PW Grocott
author_facet Ahilanandan Dushianthan
Martin Knight
Peter Russell
Michael PW Grocott
author_sort Ahilanandan Dushianthan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Perioperative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT), defined as the administration of fluids with or without inotropes or vasoactive agents against explicit measured goals to augment blood flow, has been evaluated in many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) over the past four decades. Reported post-operative pulmonary complications commonly include chest infection or pneumonia, atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute lung injury, aspiration pneumonitis, pulmonary embolism, and pulmonary oedema. Despite the substantial clinical literature in this area, it remains unclear whether their incidence is reduced by GDHT. This systematic review aims to determine the effect of GDHT on the respiratory outcomes listed above, in surgical patients. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and clinical trial registries up until January 2020. We included all RCTs reporting pulmonary outcomes. The primary outcome was post-operative pulmonary complications and secondary outcomes were specific pulmonary complications and intra-operative fluid input. Data synthesis was performed on Review Manager and heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. Results We identified 66 studies with 9548 participants reporting pulmonary complications. GDHT resulted in a significant reduction in total pulmonary complications (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.92). The incidence of pulmonary infections, reported in 45 studies with 6969 participants, was significantly lower in the GDHT group (OR 0.72, CI 0.60 to 0.86). Pulmonary oedema was recorded in 23 studies with 3205 participants and was less common in the GDHT group (OR 0.47, CI 0.30 to 0.73). There were no differences in the incidences of pulmonary embolism or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sub-group analyses demonstrated: (i) benefit from GDHT in general/abdominal/mixed and cardiothoracic surgery but not in orthopaedic or vascular surgery; and (ii) benefit from fluids with inotropes and/or vasopressors in combination but not from fluids alone. Overall, the GDHT group received more colloid (+280 ml) and less crystalloid (−375 ml) solutions than the control group. Due to clinical and statistical heterogeneity, we downgraded this evidence to moderate. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that the use of GDHT using fluids with inotropes and/or vasopressors, but not fluids alone, reduces the development of post-operative pulmonary infections and pulmonary oedema in general, abdominal and cardiothoracic surgical patients. This evidence was graded as moderate. PROSPERO registry reference: CRD42020170361
first_indexed 2024-12-12T00:05:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-93894e94b9a142bb9badd0de226f9650
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-0525
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T00:05:12Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Perioperative Medicine
spelling doaj.art-93894e94b9a142bb9badd0de226f96502022-12-22T00:45:08ZengBMCPerioperative Medicine2047-05252020-10-019111610.1186/s13741-020-00161-5Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of GDHT on post-operative pulmonary complicationsAhilanandan Dushianthan0Martin Knight1Peter Russell2Michael PW Grocott3General Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustGeneral Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustAbstract Background Perioperative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT), defined as the administration of fluids with or without inotropes or vasoactive agents against explicit measured goals to augment blood flow, has been evaluated in many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) over the past four decades. Reported post-operative pulmonary complications commonly include chest infection or pneumonia, atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute lung injury, aspiration pneumonitis, pulmonary embolism, and pulmonary oedema. Despite the substantial clinical literature in this area, it remains unclear whether their incidence is reduced by GDHT. This systematic review aims to determine the effect of GDHT on the respiratory outcomes listed above, in surgical patients. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and clinical trial registries up until January 2020. We included all RCTs reporting pulmonary outcomes. The primary outcome was post-operative pulmonary complications and secondary outcomes were specific pulmonary complications and intra-operative fluid input. Data synthesis was performed on Review Manager and heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. Results We identified 66 studies with 9548 participants reporting pulmonary complications. GDHT resulted in a significant reduction in total pulmonary complications (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.92). The incidence of pulmonary infections, reported in 45 studies with 6969 participants, was significantly lower in the GDHT group (OR 0.72, CI 0.60 to 0.86). Pulmonary oedema was recorded in 23 studies with 3205 participants and was less common in the GDHT group (OR 0.47, CI 0.30 to 0.73). There were no differences in the incidences of pulmonary embolism or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sub-group analyses demonstrated: (i) benefit from GDHT in general/abdominal/mixed and cardiothoracic surgery but not in orthopaedic or vascular surgery; and (ii) benefit from fluids with inotropes and/or vasopressors in combination but not from fluids alone. Overall, the GDHT group received more colloid (+280 ml) and less crystalloid (−375 ml) solutions than the control group. Due to clinical and statistical heterogeneity, we downgraded this evidence to moderate. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that the use of GDHT using fluids with inotropes and/or vasopressors, but not fluids alone, reduces the development of post-operative pulmonary infections and pulmonary oedema in general, abdominal and cardiothoracic surgical patients. This evidence was graded as moderate. PROSPERO registry reference: CRD42020170361http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13741-020-00161-5Goal-directedFluid therapySurgery
spellingShingle Ahilanandan Dushianthan
Martin Knight
Peter Russell
Michael PW Grocott
Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of GDHT on post-operative pulmonary complications
Perioperative Medicine
Goal-directed
Fluid therapy
Surgery
title Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of GDHT on post-operative pulmonary complications
title_full Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of GDHT on post-operative pulmonary complications
title_fullStr Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of GDHT on post-operative pulmonary complications
title_full_unstemmed Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of GDHT on post-operative pulmonary complications
title_short Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of GDHT on post-operative pulmonary complications
title_sort goal directed haemodynamic therapy gdht in surgical patients systematic review and meta analysis of the impact of gdht on post operative pulmonary complications
topic Goal-directed
Fluid therapy
Surgery
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13741-020-00161-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ahilanandandushianthan goaldirectedhaemodynamictherapygdhtinsurgicalpatientssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheimpactofgdhtonpostoperativepulmonarycomplications
AT martinknight goaldirectedhaemodynamictherapygdhtinsurgicalpatientssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheimpactofgdhtonpostoperativepulmonarycomplications
AT peterrussell goaldirectedhaemodynamictherapygdhtinsurgicalpatientssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheimpactofgdhtonpostoperativepulmonarycomplications
AT michaelpwgrocott goaldirectedhaemodynamictherapygdhtinsurgicalpatientssystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheimpactofgdhtonpostoperativepulmonarycomplications