Reuse of Untreated Fine Sediments as Filler: Is It More Beneficial than Incorporating Them as Sand?

Large amounts of sediments are dredged each year to ensure navigation. These materials, classified as waste, seem to be promising alternatives to conventional construction materials. Dredging operations, carried out by the Territorial Directorate of the Seine Basin (DTBS), generate an annual volume...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamza Beddaa, Amor Ben Fraj, Francis Lavergne, Jean-Michel Torrenti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-02-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/12/2/211
_version_ 1797482151356137472
author Hamza Beddaa
Amor Ben Fraj
Francis Lavergne
Jean-Michel Torrenti
author_facet Hamza Beddaa
Amor Ben Fraj
Francis Lavergne
Jean-Michel Torrenti
author_sort Hamza Beddaa
collection DOAJ
description Large amounts of sediments are dredged each year to ensure navigation. These materials, classified as waste, seem to be promising alternatives to conventional construction materials. Dredging operations, carried out by the Territorial Directorate of the Seine Basin (DTBS), generate an annual volume of sediments of about 150,000 m<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mn>3</mn></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>, of which nearly 50% are fine sediments (<80 <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula>m). For these fine sediments, it is necessary to look for possible ways of valorisation, knowing that the coarse sediments, sands and gravels are already easily reused in concrete. The valorisation of fine sediments, such as concrete with 30% sand, has already been evaluated. However, it was found to significantly affect concrete performance; it extends setting time from 3 to 18 h, decreases compressive strength by an average of 50% and increases shrinkage deformation up to 200%. This paper seeks to evaluate the effects of ten different fine sediments, used as substitutes for 10% of cement by volume, on physico-chemical and mechanical properties. The experimental results show that fine sediments marginally affect concrete properties. The main peak of the released heat flux is delayed to less than 4 h, the compressive strength is decreased by 8% on average and the increase in shrinkage deformation does not exceed 17%, except for in two fine sediments. This incorporation method also has an environmental advantage over substituting 30% of concrete with sand, as it reduces CO<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msub><mrow></mrow><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> emissions by almost 10% (instead of 0.2%).
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:25:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-938cde677d764234902b02e99f6493d7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:25:13Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-938cde677d764234902b02e99f6493d72023-11-23T19:06:41ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092022-02-0112221110.3390/buildings12020211Reuse of Untreated Fine Sediments as Filler: Is It More Beneficial than Incorporating Them as Sand?Hamza Beddaa0Amor Ben Fraj1Francis Lavergne2Jean-Michel Torrenti3Research-Team DIMA, Cerema, 120 Rue de Paris, BP 216 Sourdun, 77487 Provins, FranceResearch-Team DIMA, Cerema, 120 Rue de Paris, BP 216 Sourdun, 77487 Provins, FranceResearch-Team DIMA, Cerema, 120 Rue de Paris, BP 216 Sourdun, 77487 Provins, FranceGustave Department of Materials and Structures, Eiffel University, 14 Boulevard Newton, 77455 Champs-sur-Marne, FranceLarge amounts of sediments are dredged each year to ensure navigation. These materials, classified as waste, seem to be promising alternatives to conventional construction materials. Dredging operations, carried out by the Territorial Directorate of the Seine Basin (DTBS), generate an annual volume of sediments of about 150,000 m<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mn>3</mn></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>, of which nearly 50% are fine sediments (<80 <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi></semantics></math></inline-formula>m). For these fine sediments, it is necessary to look for possible ways of valorisation, knowing that the coarse sediments, sands and gravels are already easily reused in concrete. The valorisation of fine sediments, such as concrete with 30% sand, has already been evaluated. However, it was found to significantly affect concrete performance; it extends setting time from 3 to 18 h, decreases compressive strength by an average of 50% and increases shrinkage deformation up to 200%. This paper seeks to evaluate the effects of ten different fine sediments, used as substitutes for 10% of cement by volume, on physico-chemical and mechanical properties. The experimental results show that fine sediments marginally affect concrete properties. The main peak of the released heat flux is delayed to less than 4 h, the compressive strength is decreased by 8% on average and the increase in shrinkage deformation does not exceed 17%, except for in two fine sediments. This incorporation method also has an environmental advantage over substituting 30% of concrete with sand, as it reduces CO<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msub><mrow></mrow><mn>2</mn></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> emissions by almost 10% (instead of 0.2%).https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/12/2/211untreated sedimentconcrete propertieseconomic viabilitycarbon footprint
spellingShingle Hamza Beddaa
Amor Ben Fraj
Francis Lavergne
Jean-Michel Torrenti
Reuse of Untreated Fine Sediments as Filler: Is It More Beneficial than Incorporating Them as Sand?
Buildings
untreated sediment
concrete properties
economic viability
carbon footprint
title Reuse of Untreated Fine Sediments as Filler: Is It More Beneficial than Incorporating Them as Sand?
title_full Reuse of Untreated Fine Sediments as Filler: Is It More Beneficial than Incorporating Them as Sand?
title_fullStr Reuse of Untreated Fine Sediments as Filler: Is It More Beneficial than Incorporating Them as Sand?
title_full_unstemmed Reuse of Untreated Fine Sediments as Filler: Is It More Beneficial than Incorporating Them as Sand?
title_short Reuse of Untreated Fine Sediments as Filler: Is It More Beneficial than Incorporating Them as Sand?
title_sort reuse of untreated fine sediments as filler is it more beneficial than incorporating them as sand
topic untreated sediment
concrete properties
economic viability
carbon footprint
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/12/2/211
work_keys_str_mv AT hamzabeddaa reuseofuntreatedfinesedimentsasfillerisitmorebeneficialthanincorporatingthemassand
AT amorbenfraj reuseofuntreatedfinesedimentsasfillerisitmorebeneficialthanincorporatingthemassand
AT francislavergne reuseofuntreatedfinesedimentsasfillerisitmorebeneficialthanincorporatingthemassand
AT jeanmicheltorrenti reuseofuntreatedfinesedimentsasfillerisitmorebeneficialthanincorporatingthemassand