Diagnostic value of Kaiser score combined with breast vascular assessment from breast MRI for the characterization of breast lesions

ObjectivesThe Kaiser scoring system for breast magnetic resonance imaging is a clinical decision-making tool for diagnosing breast lesions. However, the Kaiser score (KS) did not include the evaluation of breast vascularity. Therefore, this study aimed to use KS combined with breast vascular assessm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xin-zhu Zhou, Lian-hua Liu, Shuang He, Hui-fang Yao, Li-ping Chen, Chen Deng, Shuang-Ling Li, Xiao-yong Zhang, Hua Lai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1165405/full
_version_ 1797785594094419968
author Xin-zhu Zhou
Lian-hua Liu
Shuang He
Hui-fang Yao
Li-ping Chen
Chen Deng
Shuang-Ling Li
Xiao-yong Zhang
Hua Lai
author_facet Xin-zhu Zhou
Lian-hua Liu
Shuang He
Hui-fang Yao
Li-ping Chen
Chen Deng
Shuang-Ling Li
Xiao-yong Zhang
Hua Lai
author_sort Xin-zhu Zhou
collection DOAJ
description ObjectivesThe Kaiser scoring system for breast magnetic resonance imaging is a clinical decision-making tool for diagnosing breast lesions. However, the Kaiser score (KS) did not include the evaluation of breast vascularity. Therefore, this study aimed to use KS combined with breast vascular assessment, defined as KS*, and investigate the effectiveness of KS* in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.MethodsThis retrospective study included 223 patients with suspicious breast lesions and pathologically verified results. The histopathological diagnostic criteria were according to the fifth edition of the WHO classification of breast tumors. The KS* was obtained after a joint evaluation combining the original KS and breast vasculature assessment. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for comparing differences in the diagnostic performance between KS* and KS, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) was compared.ResultsThere were 119 (53.4%) benign and 104 (46.6%) malignant lesions in total. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of increased ipsilateral breast vascularity were 69.2%, 76.5%, and 73.1%, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of AVS were 82.7%, 76.5%, and 79.4%, respectively. For all lesions included the AUC of KS* was greater than that of KS (0.877 vs. 0.858, P = 0.016). The largest difference in AUC was observed in the non-mass subgroup (0.793 vs. 0.725, P = 0.029).ConclusionIpsilaterally increased breast vascularity and a positive AVS sign were significantly associated with malignancy. KS combined with breast vascular assessment can effectively improve the diagnostic ability of KS for breast lesions, especially for non-mass lesions.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:56:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-939bb246466d4bdeb474dee5b74cb959
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:56:15Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-939bb246466d4bdeb474dee5b74cb9592023-07-06T20:13:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2023-07-011310.3389/fonc.2023.11654051165405Diagnostic value of Kaiser score combined with breast vascular assessment from breast MRI for the characterization of breast lesionsXin-zhu Zhou0Lian-hua Liu1Shuang He2Hui-fang Yao3Li-ping Chen4Chen Deng5Shuang-Ling Li6Xiao-yong Zhang7Hua Lai8Department of Radiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaClinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaObjectivesThe Kaiser scoring system for breast magnetic resonance imaging is a clinical decision-making tool for diagnosing breast lesions. However, the Kaiser score (KS) did not include the evaluation of breast vascularity. Therefore, this study aimed to use KS combined with breast vascular assessment, defined as KS*, and investigate the effectiveness of KS* in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.MethodsThis retrospective study included 223 patients with suspicious breast lesions and pathologically verified results. The histopathological diagnostic criteria were according to the fifth edition of the WHO classification of breast tumors. The KS* was obtained after a joint evaluation combining the original KS and breast vasculature assessment. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for comparing differences in the diagnostic performance between KS* and KS, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) was compared.ResultsThere were 119 (53.4%) benign and 104 (46.6%) malignant lesions in total. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of increased ipsilateral breast vascularity were 69.2%, 76.5%, and 73.1%, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of AVS were 82.7%, 76.5%, and 79.4%, respectively. For all lesions included the AUC of KS* was greater than that of KS (0.877 vs. 0.858, P = 0.016). The largest difference in AUC was observed in the non-mass subgroup (0.793 vs. 0.725, P = 0.029).ConclusionIpsilaterally increased breast vascularity and a positive AVS sign were significantly associated with malignancy. KS combined with breast vascular assessment can effectively improve the diagnostic ability of KS for breast lesions, especially for non-mass lesions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1165405/fullbreastbreast neoplasmsmagnetic resonance imagingclinical decision makingbreast cancer
spellingShingle Xin-zhu Zhou
Lian-hua Liu
Shuang He
Hui-fang Yao
Li-ping Chen
Chen Deng
Shuang-Ling Li
Xiao-yong Zhang
Hua Lai
Diagnostic value of Kaiser score combined with breast vascular assessment from breast MRI for the characterization of breast lesions
Frontiers in Oncology
breast
breast neoplasms
magnetic resonance imaging
clinical decision making
breast cancer
title Diagnostic value of Kaiser score combined with breast vascular assessment from breast MRI for the characterization of breast lesions
title_full Diagnostic value of Kaiser score combined with breast vascular assessment from breast MRI for the characterization of breast lesions
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of Kaiser score combined with breast vascular assessment from breast MRI for the characterization of breast lesions
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of Kaiser score combined with breast vascular assessment from breast MRI for the characterization of breast lesions
title_short Diagnostic value of Kaiser score combined with breast vascular assessment from breast MRI for the characterization of breast lesions
title_sort diagnostic value of kaiser score combined with breast vascular assessment from breast mri for the characterization of breast lesions
topic breast
breast neoplasms
magnetic resonance imaging
clinical decision making
breast cancer
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1165405/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xinzhuzhou diagnosticvalueofkaiserscorecombinedwithbreastvascularassessmentfrombreastmriforthecharacterizationofbreastlesions
AT lianhualiu diagnosticvalueofkaiserscorecombinedwithbreastvascularassessmentfrombreastmriforthecharacterizationofbreastlesions
AT shuanghe diagnosticvalueofkaiserscorecombinedwithbreastvascularassessmentfrombreastmriforthecharacterizationofbreastlesions
AT huifangyao diagnosticvalueofkaiserscorecombinedwithbreastvascularassessmentfrombreastmriforthecharacterizationofbreastlesions
AT lipingchen diagnosticvalueofkaiserscorecombinedwithbreastvascularassessmentfrombreastmriforthecharacterizationofbreastlesions
AT chendeng diagnosticvalueofkaiserscorecombinedwithbreastvascularassessmentfrombreastmriforthecharacterizationofbreastlesions
AT shuanglingli diagnosticvalueofkaiserscorecombinedwithbreastvascularassessmentfrombreastmriforthecharacterizationofbreastlesions
AT xiaoyongzhang diagnosticvalueofkaiserscorecombinedwithbreastvascularassessmentfrombreastmriforthecharacterizationofbreastlesions
AT hualai diagnosticvalueofkaiserscorecombinedwithbreastvascularassessmentfrombreastmriforthecharacterizationofbreastlesions