The Evolution of Regime Change and Information Warfare in the 21st Century

Although information is nothing new to war or conflict, the speed at which it reaches a much wider target audience, and thus its potential impact and consequences, is changing due to the rapid development of information and communications technology. Regime change and information warfare have been a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: G. Simons
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: MGIMO University Press 2021-03-01
Series:Международная аналитика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/309
_version_ 1797878029306822656
author G. Simons
author_facet G. Simons
author_sort G. Simons
collection DOAJ
description Although information is nothing new to war or conflict, the speed at which it reaches a much wider target audience, and thus its potential impact and consequences, is changing due to the rapid development of information and communications technology. Regime change and information warfare have been around for a very long time in the history of organised human societies. An undertaken review of academic literature demonstrates a great interest today to these concepts in academic, policymaking and practical terms. The present article attempts to track the evolution of the Western conceptual and theoretical thinking on the use of regime change and information warfare, seeking to understand the factors that precipitate it. In the paper I address the following, what is the relationship between information warfare and regime change? The high level of information and communications technology development and persisting leadership globally have allowed the United States to engage in regime change and information warfare more effective, although not without risks. The author considers the most illustrative examples of such engagement and, based on them, concludes that we have seen a shift in motivation from an offensive stance (the desire to spread influence) to a defensive one (the desire to prevent other international actors from gaining influence and power) on the global level. The theoretical method chosen for the analysis is phenomenology, as a means of the reading and analysis of a lived experience as well as a qualitative method will be used to analyse the data, where the goal is to capture the complexity of the object of study.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T02:27:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-93b6d0b0a99042d0b9e6576247e52adf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2587-8476
2541-9633
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-10T02:27:11Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MGIMO University Press
record_format Article
series Международная аналитика
spelling doaj.art-93b6d0b0a99042d0b9e6576247e52adf2023-03-13T08:01:57ZrusMGIMO University PressМеждународная аналитика2587-84762541-96332021-03-01114729010.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-4-72-90301The Evolution of Regime Change and Information Warfare in the 21st CenturyG. Simons0Институт российских и евразийских исследований Уппсальского университета; Гуманитарный институт Уральского федерального университета в ЕкатеринбургеAlthough information is nothing new to war or conflict, the speed at which it reaches a much wider target audience, and thus its potential impact and consequences, is changing due to the rapid development of information and communications technology. Regime change and information warfare have been around for a very long time in the history of organised human societies. An undertaken review of academic literature demonstrates a great interest today to these concepts in academic, policymaking and practical terms. The present article attempts to track the evolution of the Western conceptual and theoretical thinking on the use of regime change and information warfare, seeking to understand the factors that precipitate it. In the paper I address the following, what is the relationship between information warfare and regime change? The high level of information and communications technology development and persisting leadership globally have allowed the United States to engage in regime change and information warfare more effective, although not without risks. The author considers the most illustrative examples of such engagement and, based on them, concludes that we have seen a shift in motivation from an offensive stance (the desire to spread influence) to a defensive one (the desire to prevent other international actors from gaining influence and power) on the global level. The theoretical method chosen for the analysis is phenomenology, as a means of the reading and analysis of a lived experience as well as a qualitative method will be used to analyse the data, where the goal is to capture the complexity of the object of study.https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/309гибридная войнаинформационная войнаполитическая войнасмена режимаэволюционирующий мировой порядокинформационные операции
spellingShingle G. Simons
The Evolution of Regime Change and Information Warfare in the 21st Century
Международная аналитика
гибридная война
информационная война
политическая война
смена режима
эволюционирующий мировой порядок
информационные операции
title The Evolution of Regime Change and Information Warfare in the 21st Century
title_full The Evolution of Regime Change and Information Warfare in the 21st Century
title_fullStr The Evolution of Regime Change and Information Warfare in the 21st Century
title_full_unstemmed The Evolution of Regime Change and Information Warfare in the 21st Century
title_short The Evolution of Regime Change and Information Warfare in the 21st Century
title_sort evolution of regime change and information warfare in the 21st century
topic гибридная война
информационная война
политическая война
смена режима
эволюционирующий мировой порядок
информационные операции
url https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/309
work_keys_str_mv AT gsimons theevolutionofregimechangeandinformationwarfareinthe21stcentury
AT gsimons evolutionofregimechangeandinformationwarfareinthe21stcentury