Diagnostic Efficacy and Tolerability of Molded Plastic Nasopharyngeal Swab (FinSwab) Compared to Flocked Nylon Swab in Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Viruses

ABSTRACT The supply of testing equipment is vital in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. We compared the diagnostic efficacy and tolerability of molded plastic (FinSwab; Valukumpu, Finland) versus flocked nylon (FLOQSwab; Copan, Italy) nasopharyngeal swabs in a clinical setting. Adults (n = 112) w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miia Laine, Jaakko Ahti, Ville Peltola, Piritta Peri, Antti J. Hakanen, Matti Waris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Microbiology 2021-10-01
Series:Microbiology Spectrum
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/Spectrum.00736-21
_version_ 1818940058830372864
author Miia Laine
Jaakko Ahti
Ville Peltola
Piritta Peri
Antti J. Hakanen
Matti Waris
author_facet Miia Laine
Jaakko Ahti
Ville Peltola
Piritta Peri
Antti J. Hakanen
Matti Waris
author_sort Miia Laine
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT The supply of testing equipment is vital in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. We compared the diagnostic efficacy and tolerability of molded plastic (FinSwab; Valukumpu, Finland) versus flocked nylon (FLOQSwab; Copan, Italy) nasopharyngeal swabs in a clinical setting. Adults (n = 112) with suspected symptomatic COVID-19 infection underwent nasopharyngeal sampling with FinSwab and FLOQSwab from the same nostril at a drive-in coronavirus testing station. In a subset of 36 patients the samples were collected in a randomized order to evaluate the discomfort associated with sampling. SARS-CoV-2 and 16 other respiratory viruses, as well as human β-actin mRNA were analyzed by using reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) assays. Among the 112 patients (mean age, 38 [standard deviation (SD), 14] years) β-actin mRNA was found in all samples. There was no difference in the β-actin mRNA cycle threshold (CT) values between FinSwab (mean, 22.3; SD, 3.61) and FLOQSwab (mean, 22.1; SD, 3.50; P = 0.46) swabs. There were 31 virus-positive cases (26 rhinovirus, 4 SARS-CoV-2, and 1 coronavirus-OC43), 24 of which were positive in both swabs; 3 rhinovirus positives were only found in the FinSwab, and similarly 4 rhinovirus positives were only found in the FLOQSwab. Rhinovirus CT values were similar between swab types. Of the 36 patients, 22 (61%) tolerated the sampling with the FinSwab better than with the FLOQSwab (P = 0.065). The molded plastic nasopharyngeal swab (FinSwab) was comparable to the standard flocked swab in terms of efficacy for respiratory virus detection and tolerability of sampling. IMPORTANCE We demonstrate that a molded plastic swab is a valid alternative to conventional brush-like swabs in collection of a nasopharyngeal sample for virus diagnostics.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T06:33:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-93ccc3fda386424bb44cba7224251786
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2165-0497
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T06:33:37Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format Article
series Microbiology Spectrum
spelling doaj.art-93ccc3fda386424bb44cba72242517862022-12-21T19:50:03ZengAmerican Society for MicrobiologyMicrobiology Spectrum2165-04972021-10-019210.1128/Spectrum.00736-21Diagnostic Efficacy and Tolerability of Molded Plastic Nasopharyngeal Swab (FinSwab) Compared to Flocked Nylon Swab in Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory VirusesMiia Laine0Jaakko Ahti1Ville Peltola2Piritta Peri3Antti J. Hakanen4Matti Waris5Department of Clinical Microbiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, FinlandDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, FinlandDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, FinlandDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, FinlandDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, FinlandDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, FinlandABSTRACT The supply of testing equipment is vital in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. We compared the diagnostic efficacy and tolerability of molded plastic (FinSwab; Valukumpu, Finland) versus flocked nylon (FLOQSwab; Copan, Italy) nasopharyngeal swabs in a clinical setting. Adults (n = 112) with suspected symptomatic COVID-19 infection underwent nasopharyngeal sampling with FinSwab and FLOQSwab from the same nostril at a drive-in coronavirus testing station. In a subset of 36 patients the samples were collected in a randomized order to evaluate the discomfort associated with sampling. SARS-CoV-2 and 16 other respiratory viruses, as well as human β-actin mRNA were analyzed by using reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) assays. Among the 112 patients (mean age, 38 [standard deviation (SD), 14] years) β-actin mRNA was found in all samples. There was no difference in the β-actin mRNA cycle threshold (CT) values between FinSwab (mean, 22.3; SD, 3.61) and FLOQSwab (mean, 22.1; SD, 3.50; P = 0.46) swabs. There were 31 virus-positive cases (26 rhinovirus, 4 SARS-CoV-2, and 1 coronavirus-OC43), 24 of which were positive in both swabs; 3 rhinovirus positives were only found in the FinSwab, and similarly 4 rhinovirus positives were only found in the FLOQSwab. Rhinovirus CT values were similar between swab types. Of the 36 patients, 22 (61%) tolerated the sampling with the FinSwab better than with the FLOQSwab (P = 0.065). The molded plastic nasopharyngeal swab (FinSwab) was comparable to the standard flocked swab in terms of efficacy for respiratory virus detection and tolerability of sampling. IMPORTANCE We demonstrate that a molded plastic swab is a valid alternative to conventional brush-like swabs in collection of a nasopharyngeal sample for virus diagnostics.https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/Spectrum.00736-21COVID-19nasopharyngeal swabplastic injection moldingrespiratory viruses
spellingShingle Miia Laine
Jaakko Ahti
Ville Peltola
Piritta Peri
Antti J. Hakanen
Matti Waris
Diagnostic Efficacy and Tolerability of Molded Plastic Nasopharyngeal Swab (FinSwab) Compared to Flocked Nylon Swab in Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Viruses
Microbiology Spectrum
COVID-19
nasopharyngeal swab
plastic injection molding
respiratory viruses
title Diagnostic Efficacy and Tolerability of Molded Plastic Nasopharyngeal Swab (FinSwab) Compared to Flocked Nylon Swab in Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Viruses
title_full Diagnostic Efficacy and Tolerability of Molded Plastic Nasopharyngeal Swab (FinSwab) Compared to Flocked Nylon Swab in Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Viruses
title_fullStr Diagnostic Efficacy and Tolerability of Molded Plastic Nasopharyngeal Swab (FinSwab) Compared to Flocked Nylon Swab in Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Viruses
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Efficacy and Tolerability of Molded Plastic Nasopharyngeal Swab (FinSwab) Compared to Flocked Nylon Swab in Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Viruses
title_short Diagnostic Efficacy and Tolerability of Molded Plastic Nasopharyngeal Swab (FinSwab) Compared to Flocked Nylon Swab in Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Viruses
title_sort diagnostic efficacy and tolerability of molded plastic nasopharyngeal swab finswab compared to flocked nylon swab in detection of sars cov 2 and other respiratory viruses
topic COVID-19
nasopharyngeal swab
plastic injection molding
respiratory viruses
url https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/Spectrum.00736-21
work_keys_str_mv AT miialaine diagnosticefficacyandtolerabilityofmoldedplasticnasopharyngealswabfinswabcomparedtoflockednylonswabindetectionofsarscov2andotherrespiratoryviruses
AT jaakkoahti diagnosticefficacyandtolerabilityofmoldedplasticnasopharyngealswabfinswabcomparedtoflockednylonswabindetectionofsarscov2andotherrespiratoryviruses
AT villepeltola diagnosticefficacyandtolerabilityofmoldedplasticnasopharyngealswabfinswabcomparedtoflockednylonswabindetectionofsarscov2andotherrespiratoryviruses
AT pirittaperi diagnosticefficacyandtolerabilityofmoldedplasticnasopharyngealswabfinswabcomparedtoflockednylonswabindetectionofsarscov2andotherrespiratoryviruses
AT anttijhakanen diagnosticefficacyandtolerabilityofmoldedplasticnasopharyngealswabfinswabcomparedtoflockednylonswabindetectionofsarscov2andotherrespiratoryviruses
AT mattiwaris diagnosticefficacyandtolerabilityofmoldedplasticnasopharyngealswabfinswabcomparedtoflockednylonswabindetectionofsarscov2andotherrespiratoryviruses