Muscle MRI at the time of questionable disease flares in Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM)

Abstract Background The course of JDM has improved substantially over the last 70 years with early and aggressive treatments. Yet it remains difficult to detect disease flares as symptoms may be mild; signs of rash and muscle weakness vary widely and are often equivocal; laboratory tests of muscle e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rabheh Abdul-Aziz, Chack-Yung Yu, Brent Adler, Sharon Bout-Tabaku, Katherine E. Lintner, Melissa Moore-Clingenpeel, Charles H. Spencer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-04-01
Series:Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12969-017-0154-4
_version_ 1819011592357937152
author Rabheh Abdul-Aziz
Chack-Yung Yu
Brent Adler
Sharon Bout-Tabaku
Katherine E. Lintner
Melissa Moore-Clingenpeel
Charles H. Spencer
author_facet Rabheh Abdul-Aziz
Chack-Yung Yu
Brent Adler
Sharon Bout-Tabaku
Katherine E. Lintner
Melissa Moore-Clingenpeel
Charles H. Spencer
author_sort Rabheh Abdul-Aziz
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The course of JDM has improved substantially over the last 70 years with early and aggressive treatments. Yet it remains difficult to detect disease flares as symptoms may be mild; signs of rash and muscle weakness vary widely and are often equivocal; laboratory tests of muscle enzyme levels are often normal; electromyography and muscle biopsy are invasive. Alternative tools are needed to help decide if more aggressive treatment is needed. Our objective is to determine the effectiveness of muscle Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in detecting JDM flares, and how an MRI affects physician’s decision-making regarding treatment. Methods This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nationwide Children’s Hospital. JDM patients were consulted between 1/2005 and 6/2015. MRIs were performed on both lower extremities without contrast sequentially: axial T1, axial T2 fat saturation, axial and coronal inversion recovery, and axial diffusion weighted. The physician decision that a JDM patient was in a flare was considered the gold standard. MRI results were compared with physician’s decisions on whether a relapse had occurred, and if there was a concordance between the assessment methods. Results Forty-five JDM patients were studied. Eighty percent had weakness at diagnosis, 100% typical rash, and 73% typical nail-fold capillary changes. At diagnosis, muscle enzymes were compatible with JDM generally (CK 52%, LDH 62%, aldolase 72%, AST 54% abnormal). EMG was abnormal in 3/8, muscle biopsy typical of JDM in 10/11, and MRI abnormal demonstrating myositis in 31/40. Thirteen patients had a repeat MRI for possible flares with differing indications. Three repeat MRI’s were abnormal, demonstrating myositis. There was moderate agreement about flares between MRI findings and physician’s treatment decisions (kappa = 0.59). In each abnormal MRI case the physician decided to increase treatment (100% probability for flares). MRI was negative for myositis in 10 patients, by which 7/10 the physicians chose to continue or to taper the medications (70% probability for non-flares). Conclusion A muscle MRI would facilitate objective assessments of JDM flares. When an MRI shows myositis, physicians tend to treat 100% of the time. When an MRI shows no myositis, physicians continued the same medications or tapered medications 70% of the time. Further studies would help confirm the utility and cost-effectiveness of MRI to determine JDM flares.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T01:30:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-93d3f548cd2b4125ae163821329a7c16
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1546-0096
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T01:30:36Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal
spelling doaj.art-93d3f548cd2b4125ae163821329a7c162022-12-21T19:20:23ZengBMCPediatric Rheumatology Online Journal1546-00962017-04-011511610.1186/s12969-017-0154-4Muscle MRI at the time of questionable disease flares in Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM)Rabheh Abdul-Aziz0Chack-Yung Yu1Brent Adler2Sharon Bout-Tabaku3Katherine E. Lintner4Melissa Moore-Clingenpeel5Charles H. Spencer6Nationwide Children’s HospitalNationwide Children’s HospitalNationwide Children’s HospitalNationwide Children’s HospitalNationwide Children’s HospitalNationwide Children’s HospitalNationwide Children’s HospitalAbstract Background The course of JDM has improved substantially over the last 70 years with early and aggressive treatments. Yet it remains difficult to detect disease flares as symptoms may be mild; signs of rash and muscle weakness vary widely and are often equivocal; laboratory tests of muscle enzyme levels are often normal; electromyography and muscle biopsy are invasive. Alternative tools are needed to help decide if more aggressive treatment is needed. Our objective is to determine the effectiveness of muscle Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in detecting JDM flares, and how an MRI affects physician’s decision-making regarding treatment. Methods This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nationwide Children’s Hospital. JDM patients were consulted between 1/2005 and 6/2015. MRIs were performed on both lower extremities without contrast sequentially: axial T1, axial T2 fat saturation, axial and coronal inversion recovery, and axial diffusion weighted. The physician decision that a JDM patient was in a flare was considered the gold standard. MRI results were compared with physician’s decisions on whether a relapse had occurred, and if there was a concordance between the assessment methods. Results Forty-five JDM patients were studied. Eighty percent had weakness at diagnosis, 100% typical rash, and 73% typical nail-fold capillary changes. At diagnosis, muscle enzymes were compatible with JDM generally (CK 52%, LDH 62%, aldolase 72%, AST 54% abnormal). EMG was abnormal in 3/8, muscle biopsy typical of JDM in 10/11, and MRI abnormal demonstrating myositis in 31/40. Thirteen patients had a repeat MRI for possible flares with differing indications. Three repeat MRI’s were abnormal, demonstrating myositis. There was moderate agreement about flares between MRI findings and physician’s treatment decisions (kappa = 0.59). In each abnormal MRI case the physician decided to increase treatment (100% probability for flares). MRI was negative for myositis in 10 patients, by which 7/10 the physicians chose to continue or to taper the medications (70% probability for non-flares). Conclusion A muscle MRI would facilitate objective assessments of JDM flares. When an MRI shows myositis, physicians tend to treat 100% of the time. When an MRI shows no myositis, physicians continued the same medications or tapered medications 70% of the time. Further studies would help confirm the utility and cost-effectiveness of MRI to determine JDM flares.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12969-017-0154-4MRIJuvenile dermatomyositis
spellingShingle Rabheh Abdul-Aziz
Chack-Yung Yu
Brent Adler
Sharon Bout-Tabaku
Katherine E. Lintner
Melissa Moore-Clingenpeel
Charles H. Spencer
Muscle MRI at the time of questionable disease flares in Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM)
Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal
MRI
Juvenile dermatomyositis
title Muscle MRI at the time of questionable disease flares in Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM)
title_full Muscle MRI at the time of questionable disease flares in Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM)
title_fullStr Muscle MRI at the time of questionable disease flares in Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM)
title_full_unstemmed Muscle MRI at the time of questionable disease flares in Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM)
title_short Muscle MRI at the time of questionable disease flares in Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM)
title_sort muscle mri at the time of questionable disease flares in juvenile dermatomyositis jdm
topic MRI
Juvenile dermatomyositis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12969-017-0154-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rabhehabdulaziz musclemriatthetimeofquestionablediseaseflaresinjuveniledermatomyositisjdm
AT chackyungyu musclemriatthetimeofquestionablediseaseflaresinjuveniledermatomyositisjdm
AT brentadler musclemriatthetimeofquestionablediseaseflaresinjuveniledermatomyositisjdm
AT sharonbouttabaku musclemriatthetimeofquestionablediseaseflaresinjuveniledermatomyositisjdm
AT katherineelintner musclemriatthetimeofquestionablediseaseflaresinjuveniledermatomyositisjdm
AT melissamooreclingenpeel musclemriatthetimeofquestionablediseaseflaresinjuveniledermatomyositisjdm
AT charleshspencer musclemriatthetimeofquestionablediseaseflaresinjuveniledermatomyositisjdm