Benefit sharing: Why inclusive provenance metadata matter
Fair and equitable benefit sharing of genetic resources is an expectation of the Nagoya Protocol. Although the Nagoya Protocol does not yet formally apply to Digital Sequence Information (“DSI”), discussions are currently underway regarding to include such data through ongoing Convention on Biologic...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Genetics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.1014044/full |
| _version_ | 1798031753998237696 |
|---|---|
| author | Jacob Golan KatieLee Riddle Maui Hudson Jane Anderson Natalie Kusabs Tim Coltman |
| author_facet | Jacob Golan KatieLee Riddle Maui Hudson Jane Anderson Natalie Kusabs Tim Coltman |
| author_sort | Jacob Golan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Fair and equitable benefit sharing of genetic resources is an expectation of the Nagoya Protocol. Although the Nagoya Protocol does not yet formally apply to Digital Sequence Information (“DSI”), discussions are currently underway regarding to include such data through ongoing Convention on Biological Diversity (“CBD”) negotiations. While Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (“IPLC”) expect the value generated from genomic data to be subject to benefit sharing arrangements, a range of views are currently being expressed by Nation States, IPLC and other stakeholders. The use of DSI gives rise to unique considerations, creating a gray area as to how it should be considered under the Nagoya Protocol’s Access and Benefit Sharing (“ABS”) principles. One way for benefit sharing to be enhanced is through the connection of data to proper provenance information. A significant development is the use of digital labeling systems to ensure that the origin of samples is appropriately disclosed. The Traditional Knowledge and Biocultural Labels initiative offers a practical option for data provided to genomic databases. In particular, the BioCultural Labels (“BC Labels”) are a mechanism for Indigenous communities to identify and maintain provenance, origin and authority over biocultural material and data generated from Indigenous land and waters held in research, cultural institutions and data repositories. This form of cultural metadata adds value to the research endeavor and the creation of Indigenous fields within databases adds transparency and accountability to the research environment. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:02:40Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-93df552f2f8342d9825ae848f9d8cde1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-8021 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:02:40Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Genetics |
| spelling | doaj.art-93df552f2f8342d9825ae848f9d8cde12022-12-22T04:05:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212022-09-011310.3389/fgene.2022.10140441014044Benefit sharing: Why inclusive provenance metadata matterJacob Golan0KatieLee Riddle1Maui Hudson2Jane Anderson3Natalie Kusabs4Tim Coltman5School of Law, New York University, New York, NY, United StatesTe Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New ZealandTe Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New ZealandEngelberg Center of Innovation Law and Policy, School of Law, New York University, New York, NY, United StatesTe Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New ZealandWaikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New ZealandFair and equitable benefit sharing of genetic resources is an expectation of the Nagoya Protocol. Although the Nagoya Protocol does not yet formally apply to Digital Sequence Information (“DSI”), discussions are currently underway regarding to include such data through ongoing Convention on Biological Diversity (“CBD”) negotiations. While Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (“IPLC”) expect the value generated from genomic data to be subject to benefit sharing arrangements, a range of views are currently being expressed by Nation States, IPLC and other stakeholders. The use of DSI gives rise to unique considerations, creating a gray area as to how it should be considered under the Nagoya Protocol’s Access and Benefit Sharing (“ABS”) principles. One way for benefit sharing to be enhanced is through the connection of data to proper provenance information. A significant development is the use of digital labeling systems to ensure that the origin of samples is appropriately disclosed. The Traditional Knowledge and Biocultural Labels initiative offers a practical option for data provided to genomic databases. In particular, the BioCultural Labels (“BC Labels”) are a mechanism for Indigenous communities to identify and maintain provenance, origin and authority over biocultural material and data generated from Indigenous land and waters held in research, cultural institutions and data repositories. This form of cultural metadata adds value to the research endeavor and the creation of Indigenous fields within databases adds transparency and accountability to the research environment.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.1014044/fullprovenancemetadataDSIbenefit sharingtraditional knowledgeIndigenous |
| spellingShingle | Jacob Golan KatieLee Riddle Maui Hudson Jane Anderson Natalie Kusabs Tim Coltman Benefit sharing: Why inclusive provenance metadata matter Frontiers in Genetics provenance metadata DSI benefit sharing traditional knowledge Indigenous |
| title | Benefit sharing: Why inclusive provenance metadata matter |
| title_full | Benefit sharing: Why inclusive provenance metadata matter |
| title_fullStr | Benefit sharing: Why inclusive provenance metadata matter |
| title_full_unstemmed | Benefit sharing: Why inclusive provenance metadata matter |
| title_short | Benefit sharing: Why inclusive provenance metadata matter |
| title_sort | benefit sharing why inclusive provenance metadata matter |
| topic | provenance metadata DSI benefit sharing traditional knowledge Indigenous |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.1014044/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jacobgolan benefitsharingwhyinclusiveprovenancemetadatamatter AT katieleeriddle benefitsharingwhyinclusiveprovenancemetadatamatter AT mauihudson benefitsharingwhyinclusiveprovenancemetadatamatter AT janeanderson benefitsharingwhyinclusiveprovenancemetadatamatter AT nataliekusabs benefitsharingwhyinclusiveprovenancemetadatamatter AT timcoltman benefitsharingwhyinclusiveprovenancemetadatamatter |