Maternal and perinatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labour: a historical cohort study of over 51,000 women

Background Prolonged second stage of labour has been associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. The maximum length of the second stage from full dilatation to birth of the baby remains controversial. Our aim was to determine whether extending second stage of labour was associated with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catriona Young, Sohinee Bhattacharya, Andrea Woolner, Amy Ingram, Nicole Smith, Edwin-Amalraj Raja, Mairead Black
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-06-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05733-z
_version_ 1797795462472794112
author Catriona Young
Sohinee Bhattacharya
Andrea Woolner
Amy Ingram
Nicole Smith
Edwin-Amalraj Raja
Mairead Black
author_facet Catriona Young
Sohinee Bhattacharya
Andrea Woolner
Amy Ingram
Nicole Smith
Edwin-Amalraj Raja
Mairead Black
author_sort Catriona Young
collection DOAJ
description Background Prolonged second stage of labour has been associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. The maximum length of the second stage from full dilatation to birth of the baby remains controversial. Our aim was to determine whether extending second stage of labour was associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using routinely collected hospital data from 51592 births in Aberdeen Maternity Hospital between 2000 and 2016. The hospital followed the local guidance of allowing second stage of labour to extend by an hour compared to national guidelines since 2008 (nulliparous and parous). The increasing duration of second stage of labour was the exposure. Baseline characteristics, maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between women who had a second stage labour of (a) ≤ 3 h and (b) > 3 h duration for nulliparous women; and (a) ≤ 2 h or (b) > 2 h for parous women. An additional model was run that treated the duration of second stage of labour as a continuous variable (measured in hours). All the adjusted models accounted for: age, BMI, smoking status, deprivation category, induced birth, epidural, oxytocin, gestational age, baby birthweight, mode of birth and parity (only for the final model). Results Each hourly increase in the second stage of labour was associated with an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (aOR 1.21 95% CI 1.16,1.25), having an episiotomy (aOR 1.48 95% CI 1.45, 1.52) and postpartum haemorrhage (aOR 1.27 95% CI 1.25, 1.30). The rates of caesarean and forceps delivery also increased when second stage duration increased (aOR 2.60 95% CI 2.50, 2.70, and aOR 2.44 95% CI 2.38, 2.51, respectively.) Overall adverse perinatal outcomes were not found to change significantly with duration of second stage on multivariate analysis. Conclusions As the duration of second stage of labour increased each hour, the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries, episiotomies and PPH increases significantly. Women were over 2 times more likely to have a forceps or caesarean birth. The association between adverse perinatal outcomes and the duration of second stage of labour was less convincing in this study.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:18:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-93e9adab714c4f6b9f7d5f4dc49cb797
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:18:19Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-93e9adab714c4f6b9f7d5f4dc49cb7972023-06-25T11:31:54ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932023-06-0123111010.1186/s12884-023-05733-zMaternal and perinatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labour: a historical cohort study of over 51,000 womenCatriona Young0Sohinee Bhattacharya1Andrea Woolner2Amy Ingram3Nicole Smith4Edwin-Amalraj Raja5Mairead Black6Aberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research (ACWHR), Foresterhill, University of AberdeenAberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research (ACWHR), Foresterhill, University of AberdeenAberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research (ACWHR), Foresterhill, University of AberdeenRaigmore Hospital, NHS HighlandGolden Jubilee Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeSchool of Medicine, University of AberdeenAberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research (ACWHR), Foresterhill, University of AberdeenBackground Prolonged second stage of labour has been associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. The maximum length of the second stage from full dilatation to birth of the baby remains controversial. Our aim was to determine whether extending second stage of labour was associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using routinely collected hospital data from 51592 births in Aberdeen Maternity Hospital between 2000 and 2016. The hospital followed the local guidance of allowing second stage of labour to extend by an hour compared to national guidelines since 2008 (nulliparous and parous). The increasing duration of second stage of labour was the exposure. Baseline characteristics, maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between women who had a second stage labour of (a) ≤ 3 h and (b) > 3 h duration for nulliparous women; and (a) ≤ 2 h or (b) > 2 h for parous women. An additional model was run that treated the duration of second stage of labour as a continuous variable (measured in hours). All the adjusted models accounted for: age, BMI, smoking status, deprivation category, induced birth, epidural, oxytocin, gestational age, baby birthweight, mode of birth and parity (only for the final model). Results Each hourly increase in the second stage of labour was associated with an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (aOR 1.21 95% CI 1.16,1.25), having an episiotomy (aOR 1.48 95% CI 1.45, 1.52) and postpartum haemorrhage (aOR 1.27 95% CI 1.25, 1.30). The rates of caesarean and forceps delivery also increased when second stage duration increased (aOR 2.60 95% CI 2.50, 2.70, and aOR 2.44 95% CI 2.38, 2.51, respectively.) Overall adverse perinatal outcomes were not found to change significantly with duration of second stage on multivariate analysis. Conclusions As the duration of second stage of labour increased each hour, the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries, episiotomies and PPH increases significantly. Women were over 2 times more likely to have a forceps or caesarean birth. The association between adverse perinatal outcomes and the duration of second stage of labour was less convincing in this study.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05733-zSecond stageBirthProlonged labour
spellingShingle Catriona Young
Sohinee Bhattacharya
Andrea Woolner
Amy Ingram
Nicole Smith
Edwin-Amalraj Raja
Mairead Black
Maternal and perinatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labour: a historical cohort study of over 51,000 women
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Second stage
Birth
Prolonged labour
title Maternal and perinatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labour: a historical cohort study of over 51,000 women
title_full Maternal and perinatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labour: a historical cohort study of over 51,000 women
title_fullStr Maternal and perinatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labour: a historical cohort study of over 51,000 women
title_full_unstemmed Maternal and perinatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labour: a historical cohort study of over 51,000 women
title_short Maternal and perinatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labour: a historical cohort study of over 51,000 women
title_sort maternal and perinatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labour a historical cohort study of over 51 000 women
topic Second stage
Birth
Prolonged labour
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05733-z
work_keys_str_mv AT catrionayoung maternalandperinataloutcomesofprolongedsecondstageoflabourahistoricalcohortstudyofover51000women
AT sohineebhattacharya maternalandperinataloutcomesofprolongedsecondstageoflabourahistoricalcohortstudyofover51000women
AT andreawoolner maternalandperinataloutcomesofprolongedsecondstageoflabourahistoricalcohortstudyofover51000women
AT amyingram maternalandperinataloutcomesofprolongedsecondstageoflabourahistoricalcohortstudyofover51000women
AT nicolesmith maternalandperinataloutcomesofprolongedsecondstageoflabourahistoricalcohortstudyofover51000women
AT edwinamalrajraja maternalandperinataloutcomesofprolongedsecondstageoflabourahistoricalcohortstudyofover51000women
AT maireadblack maternalandperinataloutcomesofprolongedsecondstageoflabourahistoricalcohortstudyofover51000women