Dichotomization of quantitative variables in poverty analysis

It has been proposed four schemes of dichotomization for the four household level quantitative variables – area of land holding, geographic accessibility to the nearest market centre, number of children under 15 and number of literate members of working-age – with justification in the selection of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krishna Prasad Acharya, Shanker Prasad Khanal, Devendra Chhetry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Physics, Mahendra Morang Adarsh Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University 2022-09-01
Series:Bibechana
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/BIBECHANA/article/view/46407
_version_ 1831887681286569984
author Krishna Prasad Acharya
Shanker Prasad Khanal
Devendra Chhetry
author_facet Krishna Prasad Acharya
Shanker Prasad Khanal
Devendra Chhetry
author_sort Krishna Prasad Acharya
collection DOAJ
description It has been proposed four schemes of dichotomization for the four household level quantitative variables – area of land holding, geographic accessibility to the nearest market centre, number of children under 15 and number of literate members of working-age – with justification in the selection of threshold value for each variable to dichotomize into disadvantaged and advantaged group of households using the Nepal Living Standard Survey 2010/11 data with 5988 households and 28,670 of their household members. Association of each dichotomized variable with household level poverty status (poor/non-poor) was found highly significant. Finally, the proposed schemes of dichotomization have tested empirically for their ability to differentiate the poor people into two categories - ‘more vulnerable’ and ‘less vulnerable’ - by fist estimating the three measures of poverty – head count index, poverty gap index and squared poverty gap index - of each group of population and comparing the estimated measures between the disadvantaged and advantaged group of populations. Statistical analysis has been performed by using IBM SPSS version 20. To a large extent the proposed schemes of dichotomization have found to differentiate the poor people into two groups; for example, the head count index of the disadvantaged group of the number of children under 15 is 3.1 times higher than that of the advantaged group. The results of this paper are expected to be useful to the policy makers and development planners of Nepal for focusing their poverty reduction program towards the more vulnerable group of population as well as academician. BIBECHANA 19 (2022) 142-149
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:27:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-93eaa71b986e495e97839b72401e998c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2091-0762
2382-5340
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-22T00:05:23Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Department of Physics, Mahendra Morang Adarsh Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University
record_format Article
series Bibechana
spelling doaj.art-93eaa71b986e495e97839b72401e998c2024-05-16T13:06:01ZengDepartment of Physics, Mahendra Morang Adarsh Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan UniversityBibechana2091-07622382-53402022-09-01191-210.3126/bibechana.v19i1-2.4640773474Dichotomization of quantitative variables in poverty analysisKrishna Prasad Acharya0Shanker Prasad Khanal1Devendra Chhetry2Central Department of Statistics, Institute of Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, NepalCentral Department of Statistics, Institute of Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, NepalCentral Department of Statistics, Institute of Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal It has been proposed four schemes of dichotomization for the four household level quantitative variables – area of land holding, geographic accessibility to the nearest market centre, number of children under 15 and number of literate members of working-age – with justification in the selection of threshold value for each variable to dichotomize into disadvantaged and advantaged group of households using the Nepal Living Standard Survey 2010/11 data with 5988 households and 28,670 of their household members. Association of each dichotomized variable with household level poverty status (poor/non-poor) was found highly significant. Finally, the proposed schemes of dichotomization have tested empirically for their ability to differentiate the poor people into two categories - ‘more vulnerable’ and ‘less vulnerable’ - by fist estimating the three measures of poverty – head count index, poverty gap index and squared poverty gap index - of each group of population and comparing the estimated measures between the disadvantaged and advantaged group of populations. Statistical analysis has been performed by using IBM SPSS version 20. To a large extent the proposed schemes of dichotomization have found to differentiate the poor people into two groups; for example, the head count index of the disadvantaged group of the number of children under 15 is 3.1 times higher than that of the advantaged group. The results of this paper are expected to be useful to the policy makers and development planners of Nepal for focusing their poverty reduction program towards the more vulnerable group of population as well as academician. BIBECHANA 19 (2022) 142-149 https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/BIBECHANA/article/view/46407DichotomizationHeadcount indexPoverty gap indexSquare poverty gap indexVulnerable
spellingShingle Krishna Prasad Acharya
Shanker Prasad Khanal
Devendra Chhetry
Dichotomization of quantitative variables in poverty analysis
Bibechana
Dichotomization
Headcount index
Poverty gap index
Square poverty gap index
Vulnerable
title Dichotomization of quantitative variables in poverty analysis
title_full Dichotomization of quantitative variables in poverty analysis
title_fullStr Dichotomization of quantitative variables in poverty analysis
title_full_unstemmed Dichotomization of quantitative variables in poverty analysis
title_short Dichotomization of quantitative variables in poverty analysis
title_sort dichotomization of quantitative variables in poverty analysis
topic Dichotomization
Headcount index
Poverty gap index
Square poverty gap index
Vulnerable
url https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/BIBECHANA/article/view/46407
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnaprasadacharya dichotomizationofquantitativevariablesinpovertyanalysis
AT shankerprasadkhanal dichotomizationofquantitativevariablesinpovertyanalysis
AT devendrachhetry dichotomizationofquantitativevariablesinpovertyanalysis