The Supreme Court Federal and Frankenstein Syndrome in Social Security Law: A Precedent Binding Unconstitutional
The Federal Constitution of 1988 is silent as to section III of paragraph 4 of article 40, providing for the right to special retirement to public servants, which is why the Supreme Court issued the Binding Precedent 33, ensuring that benefit social security until Law supplement regularly. Social Se...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
2016-10-01
|
| Series: | Revista de Direitos Sociais, Seguridade e Previdência Social |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadssps/article/view/481 |
| _version_ | 1819018379225202688 |
|---|---|
| author | Marco Cesar De Carvalho |
| author_facet | Marco Cesar De Carvalho |
| author_sort | Marco Cesar De Carvalho |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The Federal Constitution of 1988 is silent as to section III of paragraph 4 of article 40, providing for the right to special retirement to public servants, which is why the Supreme Court issued the Binding Precedent 33, ensuring that benefit social security until Law supplement regularly. Social Security have contributive character and should observe criteria that preserve financial and actuarial balance, with its own rules for the General Regime and the Regime Own Social Security. This study is underpinned by the jurisprudential research that originated the precedent and in the references indicated to an end. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T03:18:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-93fadc42d3c9455b80e7c7aa668fd0bd |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2525-9865 2525-9865 |
| language | Portuguese |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T03:18:29Z |
| publishDate | 2016-10-01 |
| publisher | Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista de Direitos Sociais, Seguridade e Previdência Social |
| spelling | doaj.art-93fadc42d3c9455b80e7c7aa668fd0bd2022-12-21T19:17:46ZporConselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)Revista de Direitos Sociais, Seguridade e Previdência Social2525-98652525-98652016-10-0121012210.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9865/2016.v2i1.481481The Supreme Court Federal and Frankenstein Syndrome in Social Security Law: A Precedent Binding UnconstitutionalMarco Cesar De Carvalho0Libertas - Faculdades Integradas de São Sebastião do ParaísoThe Federal Constitution of 1988 is silent as to section III of paragraph 4 of article 40, providing for the right to special retirement to public servants, which is why the Supreme Court issued the Binding Precedent 33, ensuring that benefit social security until Law supplement regularly. Social Security have contributive character and should observe criteria that preserve financial and actuarial balance, with its own rules for the General Regime and the Regime Own Social Security. This study is underpinned by the jurisprudential research that originated the precedent and in the references indicated to an end.http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadssps/article/view/481Seguridade socialDireito previdenciárioAposentadoria especial dos servidores públicosSúmula vinculante 33Inconstitucionalidade sistemática |
| spellingShingle | Marco Cesar De Carvalho The Supreme Court Federal and Frankenstein Syndrome in Social Security Law: A Precedent Binding Unconstitutional Revista de Direitos Sociais, Seguridade e Previdência Social Seguridade social Direito previdenciário Aposentadoria especial dos servidores públicos Súmula vinculante 33 Inconstitucionalidade sistemática |
| title | The Supreme Court Federal and Frankenstein Syndrome in Social Security Law: A Precedent Binding Unconstitutional |
| title_full | The Supreme Court Federal and Frankenstein Syndrome in Social Security Law: A Precedent Binding Unconstitutional |
| title_fullStr | The Supreme Court Federal and Frankenstein Syndrome in Social Security Law: A Precedent Binding Unconstitutional |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Supreme Court Federal and Frankenstein Syndrome in Social Security Law: A Precedent Binding Unconstitutional |
| title_short | The Supreme Court Federal and Frankenstein Syndrome in Social Security Law: A Precedent Binding Unconstitutional |
| title_sort | supreme court federal and frankenstein syndrome in social security law a precedent binding unconstitutional |
| topic | Seguridade social Direito previdenciário Aposentadoria especial dos servidores públicos Súmula vinculante 33 Inconstitucionalidade sistemática |
| url | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistadssps/article/view/481 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marcocesardecarvalho thesupremecourtfederalandfrankensteinsyndromeinsocialsecuritylawaprecedentbindingunconstitutional AT marcocesardecarvalho supremecourtfederalandfrankensteinsyndromeinsocialsecuritylawaprecedentbindingunconstitutional |