COMBINING DIFFERENT MCDM METHODS WITH THE COPELAND METHOD: AN INVESTIGATION ON MOTORCYCLE SELECTION
There are many different multi-criteria decision making methods in the literature. These methods, which enable criteria with different measurement units to be examined together, allow choosing between alternatives. However, different methods can produce different results depending on the...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance – MEF, Belgrade, University Business Academy in Novi Sad
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Process Management and New Technologies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LtSD7JqcKL7xXr_nUjrPYGqnnfgpmKMh/view?usp=sharing |
_version_ | 1811291880538767360 |
---|---|
author | Aşkın ÖZDAĞOĞLU Murat Kemal Keleş Anıl Altınata Alptekin Ulutaş |
author_facet | Aşkın ÖZDAĞOĞLU Murat Kemal Keleş Anıl Altınata Alptekin Ulutaş |
author_sort | Aşkın ÖZDAĞOĞLU |
collection | DOAJ |
description | There are many different multi-criteria decision making methods in the literature. These methods, which enable criteria with different measurement units to be examined together, allow choosing between alternatives. However, different methods can produce different results depending on the data set. The aim of this study is to combine the results obtained by applying different methods to the data set with the Copeland method. To this end, a problem with real data was first addressed. Technical data of motorcycle alternatives that can be preferred for individual needs were collected in terms of different criteria. The weights of these criteria were found by the PIPRECIA method. Six different multi-criteria decision making methods were used to evaluate motorcycle alternatives. These methods are MOPA, MOOSRA, COPRAS, SAW, WPM and ROV. The sequencing results obtained from these methods were combined with the Copeland method and the results were discussed. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T04:36:02Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-940a8fd9ef6c488485945895edbac96b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2334-735X 2334-7449 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T04:36:02Z |
publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
publisher | Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance – MEF, Belgrade, University Business Academy in Novi Sad |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Process Management and New Technologies |
spelling | doaj.art-940a8fd9ef6c488485945895edbac96b2022-12-22T03:02:09ZengFaculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance – MEF, Belgrade, University Business Academy in Novi SadJournal of Process Management and New Technologies2334-735X2334-74492021-10-0193-41327https://doi.org/10.5937/jpmnt9-34120COMBINING DIFFERENT MCDM METHODS WITH THE COPELAND METHOD: AN INVESTIGATION ON MOTORCYCLE SELECTIONAşkın ÖZDAĞOĞLU0Murat Kemal Keleş1Anıl Altınata2Alptekin Ulutaş3Dokuz Eylül University, Business Faculty, Business Department, Tinaztepe CampusIsparta University of Applied Sciences, Keciborlu Vocational School, Transportation Services DepartmentDokuz Eylül University, Business Faculty, Business Department, Tinaztepe CampusSivas Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, International Trade and LogisticsThere are many different multi-criteria decision making methods in the literature. These methods, which enable criteria with different measurement units to be examined together, allow choosing between alternatives. However, different methods can produce different results depending on the data set. The aim of this study is to combine the results obtained by applying different methods to the data set with the Copeland method. To this end, a problem with real data was first addressed. Technical data of motorcycle alternatives that can be preferred for individual needs were collected in terms of different criteria. The weights of these criteria were found by the PIPRECIA method. Six different multi-criteria decision making methods were used to evaluate motorcycle alternatives. These methods are MOPA, MOOSRA, COPRAS, SAW, WPM and ROV. The sequencing results obtained from these methods were combined with the Copeland method and the results were discussed.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LtSD7JqcKL7xXr_nUjrPYGqnnfgpmKMh/view?usp=sharingmulti criteria decision making (mcdm)copelandpivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (piprecia)multi objective performance analysis (mopa))multi objective optimization on the basis of simple ratio analysis (moosra)complex proportional assessment (copras)simple additive weighting (saw)weighted product method (wpm)range of value (rov)motorcycle selection |
spellingShingle | Aşkın ÖZDAĞOĞLU Murat Kemal Keleş Anıl Altınata Alptekin Ulutaş COMBINING DIFFERENT MCDM METHODS WITH THE COPELAND METHOD: AN INVESTIGATION ON MOTORCYCLE SELECTION Journal of Process Management and New Technologies multi criteria decision making (mcdm) copeland pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (piprecia) multi objective performance analysis (mopa) ) multi objective optimization on the basis of simple ratio analysis (moosra) complex proportional assessment (copras) simple additive weighting (saw) weighted product method (wpm) range of value (rov) motorcycle selection |
title | COMBINING DIFFERENT MCDM METHODS WITH THE COPELAND METHOD: AN INVESTIGATION ON MOTORCYCLE SELECTION |
title_full | COMBINING DIFFERENT MCDM METHODS WITH THE COPELAND METHOD: AN INVESTIGATION ON MOTORCYCLE SELECTION |
title_fullStr | COMBINING DIFFERENT MCDM METHODS WITH THE COPELAND METHOD: AN INVESTIGATION ON MOTORCYCLE SELECTION |
title_full_unstemmed | COMBINING DIFFERENT MCDM METHODS WITH THE COPELAND METHOD: AN INVESTIGATION ON MOTORCYCLE SELECTION |
title_short | COMBINING DIFFERENT MCDM METHODS WITH THE COPELAND METHOD: AN INVESTIGATION ON MOTORCYCLE SELECTION |
title_sort | combining different mcdm methods with the copeland method an investigation on motorcycle selection |
topic | multi criteria decision making (mcdm) copeland pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (piprecia) multi objective performance analysis (mopa) ) multi objective optimization on the basis of simple ratio analysis (moosra) complex proportional assessment (copras) simple additive weighting (saw) weighted product method (wpm) range of value (rov) motorcycle selection |
url | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LtSD7JqcKL7xXr_nUjrPYGqnnfgpmKMh/view?usp=sharing |
work_keys_str_mv | AT askınozdagoglu combiningdifferentmcdmmethodswiththecopelandmethodaninvestigationonmotorcycleselection AT muratkemalkeles combiningdifferentmcdmmethodswiththecopelandmethodaninvestigationonmotorcycleselection AT anılaltınata combiningdifferentmcdmmethodswiththecopelandmethodaninvestigationonmotorcycleselection AT alptekinulutas combiningdifferentmcdmmethodswiththecopelandmethodaninvestigationonmotorcycleselection |