Phase IV, Open-Label, Safety Study Evaluating the Use of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Procedure-Type Sedation

Dexmedetomidine (Precedex™) may be used as an alternative sedative in children, maintaining spontaneous breathing, and avoiding tracheal intubation in a non-intubated moderate or deep sedation (NI-MDS) approach. This open-label, single-arm, multicenter study evaluated the safety of dexmedetomidine i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edmund H. Jooste, Gregory B. Hammer, Christian R. Reyes, Vaibhav Katkade, Peter Szmuk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2017.00529/full
_version_ 1819057380273422336
author Edmund H. Jooste
Gregory B. Hammer
Christian R. Reyes
Vaibhav Katkade
Peter Szmuk
Peter Szmuk
author_facet Edmund H. Jooste
Gregory B. Hammer
Christian R. Reyes
Vaibhav Katkade
Peter Szmuk
Peter Szmuk
author_sort Edmund H. Jooste
collection DOAJ
description Dexmedetomidine (Precedex™) may be used as an alternative sedative in children, maintaining spontaneous breathing, and avoiding tracheal intubation in a non-intubated moderate or deep sedation (NI-MDS) approach. This open-label, single-arm, multicenter study evaluated the safety of dexmedetomidine in a pediatric population receiving NI-MDS in an operating room or a procedure room, with an intensivist or anesthesiologist in attendance, for elective diagnostic or therapeutic procedures expected to take at least 30 min. The primary endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Patients received one of two doses dependent on age: patients aged ≥28 weeks' gestational age to <1 month postnatal received dose level 1 (0.1 μg/kg load; 0.05–0.2 μg/kg/h infusion); those aged 1 month to <17 years received dose level 2 (1 μg/kg load; 0.2–2.0 μg/kg/h infusion). Sedation efficacy was assessed and defined as adequate sedation for at least 80% of the time and successful completion of the procedure without the need for rescue medication. In all, 91 patients were enrolled (dose level 1, n = 1; dose level 2, n = 90); of these, 90 received treatment and 82 completed the study. Eight patients in dose level 2 discontinued treatment for the following reasons: early completion of diagnostic or therapeutic procedure (n = 3); change in medical condition (need for intubation) requiring deeper level of sedation (n = 2); adverse event (AE; hives and emesis), lack of efficacy, and physician decision (patient not sedated enough to complete procedure; n = 1 each). Sixty-seven patients experienced 147 TEAEs. The two most commonly reported AEs were respiratory depression (bradypnea; reported per protocol-defined criteria, based on absolute respiratory rate values for age or relative decrease of 30% from baseline) and hypotension. Four patients received glycopyrrolate for bradycardia and seven patients received intravenous fluids for hypotension. SpO2 dropped by 10% in two patients, but resolved without need for manual ventilation. All other reported AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of dexmedetomidine. Two of the 78 patients in the efficacy-evaluable population met all sedation efficacy criteria. Dexmedetomidine was well-tolerated in pediatric patients undergoing procedure-type sedation.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T13:38:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9412a6363580465a8646398b1189e987
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-9812
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T13:38:23Z
publishDate 2017-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-9412a6363580465a8646398b1189e9872022-12-21T19:02:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122017-08-01810.3389/fphar.2017.00529275831Phase IV, Open-Label, Safety Study Evaluating the Use of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Procedure-Type SedationEdmund H. Jooste0Gregory B. Hammer1Christian R. Reyes2Vaibhav Katkade3Peter Szmuk4Peter Szmuk5Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesiology, Duke Children's Hospital and Health CenterDurham, NC, United StatesDepartments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine and Pediatrics, Stanford University School of MedicineStanford, CA, United StatesDepartment of Biostatistics, PfizerManila, PhilippinesDepartment of Medical Affairs, PfizerCollegeville, PA, United StatesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Children's Health Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX, United StatesOutcomes Research ConsortiumCleveland, OH, United StatesDexmedetomidine (Precedex™) may be used as an alternative sedative in children, maintaining spontaneous breathing, and avoiding tracheal intubation in a non-intubated moderate or deep sedation (NI-MDS) approach. This open-label, single-arm, multicenter study evaluated the safety of dexmedetomidine in a pediatric population receiving NI-MDS in an operating room or a procedure room, with an intensivist or anesthesiologist in attendance, for elective diagnostic or therapeutic procedures expected to take at least 30 min. The primary endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Patients received one of two doses dependent on age: patients aged ≥28 weeks' gestational age to <1 month postnatal received dose level 1 (0.1 μg/kg load; 0.05–0.2 μg/kg/h infusion); those aged 1 month to <17 years received dose level 2 (1 μg/kg load; 0.2–2.0 μg/kg/h infusion). Sedation efficacy was assessed and defined as adequate sedation for at least 80% of the time and successful completion of the procedure without the need for rescue medication. In all, 91 patients were enrolled (dose level 1, n = 1; dose level 2, n = 90); of these, 90 received treatment and 82 completed the study. Eight patients in dose level 2 discontinued treatment for the following reasons: early completion of diagnostic or therapeutic procedure (n = 3); change in medical condition (need for intubation) requiring deeper level of sedation (n = 2); adverse event (AE; hives and emesis), lack of efficacy, and physician decision (patient not sedated enough to complete procedure; n = 1 each). Sixty-seven patients experienced 147 TEAEs. The two most commonly reported AEs were respiratory depression (bradypnea; reported per protocol-defined criteria, based on absolute respiratory rate values for age or relative decrease of 30% from baseline) and hypotension. Four patients received glycopyrrolate for bradycardia and seven patients received intravenous fluids for hypotension. SpO2 dropped by 10% in two patients, but resolved without need for manual ventilation. All other reported AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of dexmedetomidine. Two of the 78 patients in the efficacy-evaluable population met all sedation efficacy criteria. Dexmedetomidine was well-tolerated in pediatric patients undergoing procedure-type sedation.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2017.00529/fullalpha2 agonistdexmedetomidinenon-intubatedpediatricsedationNCT01519167; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01519167
spellingShingle Edmund H. Jooste
Gregory B. Hammer
Christian R. Reyes
Vaibhav Katkade
Peter Szmuk
Peter Szmuk
Phase IV, Open-Label, Safety Study Evaluating the Use of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Procedure-Type Sedation
Frontiers in Pharmacology
alpha2 agonist
dexmedetomidine
non-intubated
pediatric
sedation
NCT01519167; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01519167
title Phase IV, Open-Label, Safety Study Evaluating the Use of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Procedure-Type Sedation
title_full Phase IV, Open-Label, Safety Study Evaluating the Use of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Procedure-Type Sedation
title_fullStr Phase IV, Open-Label, Safety Study Evaluating the Use of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Procedure-Type Sedation
title_full_unstemmed Phase IV, Open-Label, Safety Study Evaluating the Use of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Procedure-Type Sedation
title_short Phase IV, Open-Label, Safety Study Evaluating the Use of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Procedure-Type Sedation
title_sort phase iv open label safety study evaluating the use of dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients undergoing procedure type sedation
topic alpha2 agonist
dexmedetomidine
non-intubated
pediatric
sedation
NCT01519167; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01519167
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2017.00529/full
work_keys_str_mv AT edmundhjooste phaseivopenlabelsafetystudyevaluatingtheuseofdexmedetomidineinpediatricpatientsundergoingproceduretypesedation
AT gregorybhammer phaseivopenlabelsafetystudyevaluatingtheuseofdexmedetomidineinpediatricpatientsundergoingproceduretypesedation
AT christianrreyes phaseivopenlabelsafetystudyevaluatingtheuseofdexmedetomidineinpediatricpatientsundergoingproceduretypesedation
AT vaibhavkatkade phaseivopenlabelsafetystudyevaluatingtheuseofdexmedetomidineinpediatricpatientsundergoingproceduretypesedation
AT peterszmuk phaseivopenlabelsafetystudyevaluatingtheuseofdexmedetomidineinpediatricpatientsundergoingproceduretypesedation
AT peterszmuk phaseivopenlabelsafetystudyevaluatingtheuseofdexmedetomidineinpediatricpatientsundergoingproceduretypesedation