Working with local governments to increase access to WASH services: a case of WaterAid's participatory approaches in Nigeria
Attempts to implement participatory processes are often complicated by realities which make objectives of participation unattainable. Hence, if participation is to mean more than good intentions, it is vital to understand the strategies deployed by international nongovernmental organisations (INGOs)...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IWA Publishing
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | H2Open Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://h2oj.iwaponline.com/content/5/3/424 |
| _version_ | 1811194481535352832 |
|---|---|
| author | Tariya Sarauta Yusuf Anna Murray Chukwumerije Okereke |
| author_facet | Tariya Sarauta Yusuf Anna Murray Chukwumerije Okereke |
| author_sort | Tariya Sarauta Yusuf |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Attempts to implement participatory processes are often complicated by realities which make objectives of participation unattainable. Hence, if participation is to mean more than good intentions, it is vital to understand the strategies deployed by international nongovernmental organisations (INGOs) in participatory development. This study employed a qualitative case-study approach to evaluate the participatory processes employed in two WASH projects implemented by WaterAid Nigeria attempting work with Local Government Areas: the Sustainable Total Sanitation project and the HSBC Water programme. WaterAid Nigeria's participatory development approach recognises the responsibility of the various tiers of government for its citizens' wellbeing, especially the need for partnership with the Local Government Area (LGA) towards the delivery of WASH services. The state, as the ‘duty bearer’, is responsible for the provision of WASH services. Thus, both projects centred on government capacity building and community empowerment through the establishment and capacity development of WASH units in LGAs, insistence on counterpart funding and the establishment of water, sanitation and hygiene committees (WASHCOMs). Despite these attempts, findings highlighted the persistence of inefficiencies within the LGA WASH system that rendered partnerships ineffective. At the community level, WASHCOMs were not sustainable. Despite the challenges of implementing partnerships between INGOs and LGAs, such partnership remains a way to improve the provision of WASH services in Nigeria and other low- and middle-income countries. To better work within the participatory model, WASH INGOs should explore how to better use existing LGA arrangements for service delivery. Additionally, the LGA, as a duty bearer, could foster genuine, non-discriminatory spaces for the participation of communities by taking political, socio-economic and cultural differences into account.
HIGHLIGHTS
In the WASH sector, a growing feature of participatory development is the building of partnerships between different tiers of government and international nongovernmental organisations (INGOs) to deliver development projects.;
In two case study projects in Nigeria, WaterAid elicited partnerships with Local Government Areas (LGAs) in WASH service delivery through the formation of WASH units, capacity building, insistence on counterpart funding and formation of WASH committees.;
Various frustrations existed with implementing LGA-INGO partnerships. Despite capacity building attempts, there was still inefficiency, bureaucracy and aid dependency within the LGA WASH system that served as impediments to effective partnership. Institutions and structures established to facilitate partnership with LGAs were not sustainable.;
To more effectively work within the participatory model, WASH INGOs could seek to understand the power dynamics in the LGA system and explore how to better use existing LGA arrangements.;
Additionally, the LGA, as duty bearer responsible for WASH service provision, could foster genuine, non-discriminatory spaces for participation of communities by taking political, socioeconomic and cultural differences into account.; |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:27:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-941729c81ce24e94848eca95f69d9e35 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2616-6518 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:27:59Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | IWA Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | H2Open Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-941729c81ce24e94848eca95f69d9e352022-12-22T03:55:28ZengIWA PublishingH2Open Journal2616-65182022-09-015342443710.2166/h2oj.2022.061061Working with local governments to increase access to WASH services: a case of WaterAid's participatory approaches in NigeriaTariya Sarauta Yusuf0Anna Murray1Chukwumerije Okereke2 WaterAid UK, 6th floor, 20 Canada Square, London E14 5NN, UK The Aquaya Institute, P.O. Box 1603, San Anselmo, CA 94979, USA Centre for Climate and Development, Alex-Ekueme Federal University, Ndufu-Alike (AEFUNAI), Ikwo, Ebonyi State, Nigeria Attempts to implement participatory processes are often complicated by realities which make objectives of participation unattainable. Hence, if participation is to mean more than good intentions, it is vital to understand the strategies deployed by international nongovernmental organisations (INGOs) in participatory development. This study employed a qualitative case-study approach to evaluate the participatory processes employed in two WASH projects implemented by WaterAid Nigeria attempting work with Local Government Areas: the Sustainable Total Sanitation project and the HSBC Water programme. WaterAid Nigeria's participatory development approach recognises the responsibility of the various tiers of government for its citizens' wellbeing, especially the need for partnership with the Local Government Area (LGA) towards the delivery of WASH services. The state, as the ‘duty bearer’, is responsible for the provision of WASH services. Thus, both projects centred on government capacity building and community empowerment through the establishment and capacity development of WASH units in LGAs, insistence on counterpart funding and the establishment of water, sanitation and hygiene committees (WASHCOMs). Despite these attempts, findings highlighted the persistence of inefficiencies within the LGA WASH system that rendered partnerships ineffective. At the community level, WASHCOMs were not sustainable. Despite the challenges of implementing partnerships between INGOs and LGAs, such partnership remains a way to improve the provision of WASH services in Nigeria and other low- and middle-income countries. To better work within the participatory model, WASH INGOs should explore how to better use existing LGA arrangements for service delivery. Additionally, the LGA, as a duty bearer, could foster genuine, non-discriminatory spaces for the participation of communities by taking political, socio-economic and cultural differences into account. HIGHLIGHTS In the WASH sector, a growing feature of participatory development is the building of partnerships between different tiers of government and international nongovernmental organisations (INGOs) to deliver development projects.; In two case study projects in Nigeria, WaterAid elicited partnerships with Local Government Areas (LGAs) in WASH service delivery through the formation of WASH units, capacity building, insistence on counterpart funding and formation of WASH committees.; Various frustrations existed with implementing LGA-INGO partnerships. Despite capacity building attempts, there was still inefficiency, bureaucracy and aid dependency within the LGA WASH system that served as impediments to effective partnership. Institutions and structures established to facilitate partnership with LGAs were not sustainable.; To more effectively work within the participatory model, WASH INGOs could seek to understand the power dynamics in the LGA system and explore how to better use existing LGA arrangements.; Additionally, the LGA, as duty bearer responsible for WASH service provision, could foster genuine, non-discriminatory spaces for participation of communities by taking political, socioeconomic and cultural differences into account.;http://h2oj.iwaponline.com/content/5/3/424capacity buildingcounterpart fundinglocal governanceparticipatory developmentpartnerships |
| spellingShingle | Tariya Sarauta Yusuf Anna Murray Chukwumerije Okereke Working with local governments to increase access to WASH services: a case of WaterAid's participatory approaches in Nigeria H2Open Journal capacity building counterpart funding local governance participatory development partnerships |
| title | Working with local governments to increase access to WASH services: a case of WaterAid's participatory approaches in Nigeria |
| title_full | Working with local governments to increase access to WASH services: a case of WaterAid's participatory approaches in Nigeria |
| title_fullStr | Working with local governments to increase access to WASH services: a case of WaterAid's participatory approaches in Nigeria |
| title_full_unstemmed | Working with local governments to increase access to WASH services: a case of WaterAid's participatory approaches in Nigeria |
| title_short | Working with local governments to increase access to WASH services: a case of WaterAid's participatory approaches in Nigeria |
| title_sort | working with local governments to increase access to wash services a case of wateraid s participatory approaches in nigeria |
| topic | capacity building counterpart funding local governance participatory development partnerships |
| url | http://h2oj.iwaponline.com/content/5/3/424 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tariyasarautayusuf workingwithlocalgovernmentstoincreaseaccesstowashservicesacaseofwateraidsparticipatoryapproachesinnigeria AT annamurray workingwithlocalgovernmentstoincreaseaccesstowashservicesacaseofwateraidsparticipatoryapproachesinnigeria AT chukwumerijeokereke workingwithlocalgovernmentstoincreaseaccesstowashservicesacaseofwateraidsparticipatoryapproachesinnigeria |