Some remarks against non-epistemic accounts of immediate premises in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics
Most interpretations of Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics believe that the term ‘ameson’ is used to describe the principles or foundations of a given system of justification or explanation as epistemically prior to or more fundamental than the other propositions in the system. Epistemic readings (as...
Main Author: | Breno Zuppolini |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
2023-10-01
|
Series: | Revista de Filosofia Antiga |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/215696 |
Similar Items
-
SYLLOGISMS AND EXISTENCE IN ARISTOTLE’S POSTERIOR ANALYTICS
by: Joseph Karbowski
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Two Senses of Necessity for Avicenna: A Response to a Famous Controversy in Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic
by: Mostafa Zali
Published: (2019-09-01) -
The commonly accepted statement (το ομολογουμενον) as a starting point for a theological discussion – Eunomius and Gregory of Nyssa
by: Marta Przyszychowska
Published: (2018-12-01) -
A Look at "From a Hypothesis" Syllogism from Aristotle to Farabi
by: Amin Shahverdi
Published: (2018-05-01) -
The Analytical Perspective of Aristotle’s Categorical and Modal Syllogisms
by: Marian Andrzej Wesoły
Published: (2018-12-01)