THE SAFETY MEASURE OF PROHIBITING TO EXERCISE A PROFESSION, IMPOSED BY THE COURT IN CASE OF MAL PRAXIS, MAY ENVISAGE THE PROFESSION OF DOCTOR IN THE WIDER SENSE (AS A WHOLE) OR ONLY THE SPECIALTY THAT OCCASIONED THE COMMITTING OF THE OFFENCE PROVIDED IN THE CRIMINAL LAW

The present paper examines the possibility for the courts of law to order, in case of medical malpractice, the safety measure of prohibiting to exercise the profession of doctor in the wider sense, or only the specialty that occasioned the committing of the offence provided in the criminal law, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Traian DIMA, Adrian HĂRĂTĂU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House 2018-05-01
Series:Challenges of the Knowledge Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2018_articles/index.php?dir=1_criminal_law%2F&download=CKS_2018_criminal_law_016.pdf
_version_ 1818143041727234048
author Traian DIMA
Adrian HĂRĂTĂU
author_facet Traian DIMA
Adrian HĂRĂTĂU
author_sort Traian DIMA
collection DOAJ
description The present paper examines the possibility for the courts of law to order, in case of medical malpractice, the safety measure of prohibiting to exercise the profession of doctor in the wider sense, or only the specialty that occasioned the committing of the offence provided in the criminal law, analyzing the judicial practice regarding this issue. In accordance with Article 450 paragraph (2) of Law no. 95/2006, “disciplinary liability of doctors does not exclude criminal, tort or civil liability”. Between the regulation contained in Article 450 paragraph (2) of Law no. 95/2006 and the safety measure of prohibiting to exercise the profession of doctor, as criminal penalty, there is a close connection, within the meaning that the special law, in particular Law no. 95/2006 derogates from the general criminal law, in particular Article 111 of the Criminal Code in connection with the prohibition of exercising the medical profession. The disciplinary penalties that may be imposed against doctors for mal praxis are listed in Article 455 of Law no. 95/2006. Article 455 letter (e) sets out, as disciplinary penalty which may be imposed against doctors “the prohibition to exercise the profession or certain medical activities” for a period ranging between one month and one year. Comparing the provisions of Article 455 letter (e) of Law no. 95/2006 with the provisions of Article 111 of the Criminal Code, it may be noticed that the scope of disciplinary accountability of the doctor having committed the civil mal praxis is more comprehensive than the scope of the safety measure imposed by the criminal court.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T11:25:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-942b0d5ddf1545cf83eb5a1f4047054d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2068-7796
2068-7796
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T11:25:22Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
record_format Article
series Challenges of the Knowledge Society
spelling doaj.art-942b0d5ddf1545cf83eb5a1f4047054d2022-12-22T01:09:02ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962068-77962018-05-0112-114118THE SAFETY MEASURE OF PROHIBITING TO EXERCISE A PROFESSION, IMPOSED BY THE COURT IN CASE OF MAL PRAXIS, MAY ENVISAGE THE PROFESSION OF DOCTOR IN THE WIDER SENSE (AS A WHOLE) OR ONLY THE SPECIALTY THAT OCCASIONED THE COMMITTING OF THE OFFENCE PROVIDED IN THE CRIMINAL LAWTraian DIMA0Adrian HĂRĂTĂU1Professor, PhD, Faculty of Law, “Nicolae Titulescu” University, Bucharest (e-mail: traian.dima@univnt.ro) PhD Candidate, Attorney at Law (e-mail: adrian@haratau.ro)The present paper examines the possibility for the courts of law to order, in case of medical malpractice, the safety measure of prohibiting to exercise the profession of doctor in the wider sense, or only the specialty that occasioned the committing of the offence provided in the criminal law, analyzing the judicial practice regarding this issue. In accordance with Article 450 paragraph (2) of Law no. 95/2006, “disciplinary liability of doctors does not exclude criminal, tort or civil liability”. Between the regulation contained in Article 450 paragraph (2) of Law no. 95/2006 and the safety measure of prohibiting to exercise the profession of doctor, as criminal penalty, there is a close connection, within the meaning that the special law, in particular Law no. 95/2006 derogates from the general criminal law, in particular Article 111 of the Criminal Code in connection with the prohibition of exercising the medical profession. The disciplinary penalties that may be imposed against doctors for mal praxis are listed in Article 455 of Law no. 95/2006. Article 455 letter (e) sets out, as disciplinary penalty which may be imposed against doctors “the prohibition to exercise the profession or certain medical activities” for a period ranging between one month and one year. Comparing the provisions of Article 455 letter (e) of Law no. 95/2006 with the provisions of Article 111 of the Criminal Code, it may be noticed that the scope of disciplinary accountability of the doctor having committed the civil mal praxis is more comprehensive than the scope of the safety measure imposed by the criminal court.http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2018_articles/index.php?dir=1_criminal_law%2F&download=CKS_2018_criminal_law_016.pdfmedical malpracticesafety measurescriminal lawdoctor’s criminal liability
spellingShingle Traian DIMA
Adrian HĂRĂTĂU
THE SAFETY MEASURE OF PROHIBITING TO EXERCISE A PROFESSION, IMPOSED BY THE COURT IN CASE OF MAL PRAXIS, MAY ENVISAGE THE PROFESSION OF DOCTOR IN THE WIDER SENSE (AS A WHOLE) OR ONLY THE SPECIALTY THAT OCCASIONED THE COMMITTING OF THE OFFENCE PROVIDED IN THE CRIMINAL LAW
Challenges of the Knowledge Society
medical malpractice
safety measures
criminal law
doctor’s criminal liability
title THE SAFETY MEASURE OF PROHIBITING TO EXERCISE A PROFESSION, IMPOSED BY THE COURT IN CASE OF MAL PRAXIS, MAY ENVISAGE THE PROFESSION OF DOCTOR IN THE WIDER SENSE (AS A WHOLE) OR ONLY THE SPECIALTY THAT OCCASIONED THE COMMITTING OF THE OFFENCE PROVIDED IN THE CRIMINAL LAW
title_full THE SAFETY MEASURE OF PROHIBITING TO EXERCISE A PROFESSION, IMPOSED BY THE COURT IN CASE OF MAL PRAXIS, MAY ENVISAGE THE PROFESSION OF DOCTOR IN THE WIDER SENSE (AS A WHOLE) OR ONLY THE SPECIALTY THAT OCCASIONED THE COMMITTING OF THE OFFENCE PROVIDED IN THE CRIMINAL LAW
title_fullStr THE SAFETY MEASURE OF PROHIBITING TO EXERCISE A PROFESSION, IMPOSED BY THE COURT IN CASE OF MAL PRAXIS, MAY ENVISAGE THE PROFESSION OF DOCTOR IN THE WIDER SENSE (AS A WHOLE) OR ONLY THE SPECIALTY THAT OCCASIONED THE COMMITTING OF THE OFFENCE PROVIDED IN THE CRIMINAL LAW
title_full_unstemmed THE SAFETY MEASURE OF PROHIBITING TO EXERCISE A PROFESSION, IMPOSED BY THE COURT IN CASE OF MAL PRAXIS, MAY ENVISAGE THE PROFESSION OF DOCTOR IN THE WIDER SENSE (AS A WHOLE) OR ONLY THE SPECIALTY THAT OCCASIONED THE COMMITTING OF THE OFFENCE PROVIDED IN THE CRIMINAL LAW
title_short THE SAFETY MEASURE OF PROHIBITING TO EXERCISE A PROFESSION, IMPOSED BY THE COURT IN CASE OF MAL PRAXIS, MAY ENVISAGE THE PROFESSION OF DOCTOR IN THE WIDER SENSE (AS A WHOLE) OR ONLY THE SPECIALTY THAT OCCASIONED THE COMMITTING OF THE OFFENCE PROVIDED IN THE CRIMINAL LAW
title_sort safety measure of prohibiting to exercise a profession imposed by the court in case of mal praxis may envisage the profession of doctor in the wider sense as a whole or only the specialty that occasioned the committing of the offence provided in the criminal law
topic medical malpractice
safety measures
criminal law
doctor’s criminal liability
url http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2018_articles/index.php?dir=1_criminal_law%2F&download=CKS_2018_criminal_law_016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT traiandima thesafetymeasureofprohibitingtoexerciseaprofessionimposedbythecourtincaseofmalpraxismayenvisagetheprofessionofdoctorinthewidersenseasawholeoronlythespecialtythatoccasionedthecommittingoftheoffenceprovidedinthecriminallaw
AT adrianharatau thesafetymeasureofprohibitingtoexerciseaprofessionimposedbythecourtincaseofmalpraxismayenvisagetheprofessionofdoctorinthewidersenseasawholeoronlythespecialtythatoccasionedthecommittingoftheoffenceprovidedinthecriminallaw
AT traiandima safetymeasureofprohibitingtoexerciseaprofessionimposedbythecourtincaseofmalpraxismayenvisagetheprofessionofdoctorinthewidersenseasawholeoronlythespecialtythatoccasionedthecommittingoftheoffenceprovidedinthecriminallaw
AT adrianharatau safetymeasureofprohibitingtoexerciseaprofessionimposedbythecourtincaseofmalpraxismayenvisagetheprofessionofdoctorinthewidersenseasawholeoronlythespecialtythatoccasionedthecommittingoftheoffenceprovidedinthecriminallaw