Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care: a qualitative assessment
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The United States (US) Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 has spurred adoption of electronic health records. The corresponding meaningful use criteria proposed by the Centers for Medicare and M...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2010-11-01
|
| Series: | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making |
| Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/10/72 |
| _version_ | 1828746772442251264 |
|---|---|
| author | Sittig Dean F Martin Diane P Williams Emily C Devine Emily Tarczy-Hornoch Peter Payne Thomas H Sullivan Sean D |
| author_facet | Sittig Dean F Martin Diane P Williams Emily C Devine Emily Tarczy-Hornoch Peter Payne Thomas H Sullivan Sean D |
| author_sort | Sittig Dean F |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The United States (US) Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 has spurred adoption of electronic health records. The corresponding meaningful use criteria proposed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services mandates use of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems. Yet, adoption in the US and other Western countries is low and descriptions of successful implementations are primarily from the inpatient setting; less frequently the ambulatory setting. We describe prescriber and staff perceptions of implementation of a CPOE system for medications (electronic- or e-prescribing system) in the ambulatory setting.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using a cross-sectional study design, we conducted eight focus groups at three primary care sites in an independent medical group. Each site represented a unique stage of e-prescribing implementation - pre/transition/post. We used a theoretically based, semi-structured questionnaire to elicit physician (n = 17) and staff (n = 53) perceptions of implementation of the e-prescribing system. We conducted a thematic analysis of focus group discussions using formal qualitative analytic techniques (i.e. deductive framework and grounded theory). Two coders independently coded to theoretical saturation and resolved discrepancies through discussions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Ten themes emerged that describe perceptions of e-prescribing implementation: 1) improved availability of clinical information resulted in prescribing efficiencies and more coordinated care; 2) improved documentation resulted in safer care; 3) efficiencies were gained by using fewer paper charts; 4) organizational support facilitated adoption; 5) transition required time; resulted in workload shift to staff; 6) hardware configurations and network stability were important in facilitating workflow; 7) e-prescribing was time-neutral or time-saving; 8) changes in patient interactions enhanced patient care but required education; 9) pharmacy communications were enhanced but required education; 10) positive attitudes facilitated adoption.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Prescribers and staff worked through the transition to successfully adopt e-prescribing, and noted the benefits. Overall impressions were favorable. No one wished to return to paper-based prescribing.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-14T04:30:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-94367913148d4118b138a578c9dddc23 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6947 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-14T04:30:46Z |
| publishDate | 2010-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making |
| spelling | doaj.art-94367913148d4118b138a578c9dddc232022-12-22T02:12:03ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472010-11-011017210.1186/1472-6947-10-72Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care: a qualitative assessmentSittig Dean FMartin Diane PWilliams Emily CDevine EmilyTarczy-Hornoch PeterPayne Thomas HSullivan Sean D<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The United States (US) Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 has spurred adoption of electronic health records. The corresponding meaningful use criteria proposed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services mandates use of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems. Yet, adoption in the US and other Western countries is low and descriptions of successful implementations are primarily from the inpatient setting; less frequently the ambulatory setting. We describe prescriber and staff perceptions of implementation of a CPOE system for medications (electronic- or e-prescribing system) in the ambulatory setting.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using a cross-sectional study design, we conducted eight focus groups at three primary care sites in an independent medical group. Each site represented a unique stage of e-prescribing implementation - pre/transition/post. We used a theoretically based, semi-structured questionnaire to elicit physician (n = 17) and staff (n = 53) perceptions of implementation of the e-prescribing system. We conducted a thematic analysis of focus group discussions using formal qualitative analytic techniques (i.e. deductive framework and grounded theory). Two coders independently coded to theoretical saturation and resolved discrepancies through discussions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Ten themes emerged that describe perceptions of e-prescribing implementation: 1) improved availability of clinical information resulted in prescribing efficiencies and more coordinated care; 2) improved documentation resulted in safer care; 3) efficiencies were gained by using fewer paper charts; 4) organizational support facilitated adoption; 5) transition required time; resulted in workload shift to staff; 6) hardware configurations and network stability were important in facilitating workflow; 7) e-prescribing was time-neutral or time-saving; 8) changes in patient interactions enhanced patient care but required education; 9) pharmacy communications were enhanced but required education; 10) positive attitudes facilitated adoption.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Prescribers and staff worked through the transition to successfully adopt e-prescribing, and noted the benefits. Overall impressions were favorable. No one wished to return to paper-based prescribing.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/10/72 |
| spellingShingle | Sittig Dean F Martin Diane P Williams Emily C Devine Emily Tarczy-Hornoch Peter Payne Thomas H Sullivan Sean D Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care: a qualitative assessment BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making |
| title | Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care: a qualitative assessment |
| title_full | Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care: a qualitative assessment |
| title_fullStr | Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care: a qualitative assessment |
| title_full_unstemmed | Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care: a qualitative assessment |
| title_short | Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care: a qualitative assessment |
| title_sort | prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care a qualitative assessment |
| url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/10/72 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sittigdeanf prescriberandstaffperceptionsofanelectronicprescribingsysteminprimarycareaqualitativeassessment AT martindianep prescriberandstaffperceptionsofanelectronicprescribingsysteminprimarycareaqualitativeassessment AT williamsemilyc prescriberandstaffperceptionsofanelectronicprescribingsysteminprimarycareaqualitativeassessment AT devineemily prescriberandstaffperceptionsofanelectronicprescribingsysteminprimarycareaqualitativeassessment AT tarczyhornochpeter prescriberandstaffperceptionsofanelectronicprescribingsysteminprimarycareaqualitativeassessment AT paynethomash prescriberandstaffperceptionsofanelectronicprescribingsysteminprimarycareaqualitativeassessment AT sullivanseand prescriberandstaffperceptionsofanelectronicprescribingsysteminprimarycareaqualitativeassessment |