Perceived risk for falls and decision-making in riding raised ramps in mountain biking: a pilot study

Mountain biking (MTB) is a challenging activity where riders face constant decisions on whether to attempt technical paths or features (e.g., wooden ramps and jumps) that pose risk for falls and injuries. Risk homeostasis theory posits that riders pursue an optimal non-zero level of risk that balanc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily P. Chilton, Stephen N. Robinovitch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1243536/full
_version_ 1797394556393619456
author Emily P. Chilton
Stephen N. Robinovitch
author_facet Emily P. Chilton
Stephen N. Robinovitch
author_sort Emily P. Chilton
collection DOAJ
description Mountain biking (MTB) is a challenging activity where riders face constant decisions on whether to attempt technical paths or features (e.g., wooden ramps and jumps) that pose risk for falls and injuries. Risk homeostasis theory posits that riders pursue an optimal non-zero level of risk that balances the rewards of attempting challenging features with the need to avoid unreasonable risk for injury. Little is known on how riders judge risk, and the level of risk that riders deem unacceptable. We conducted experiments with experienced MTB riders (n = 17) to examine how their willingness to ride raised wooden ramps depended on their perceived probability for falling (Pf) and their perceived probability for injury in the event of a fall (Pi) while riding the ramp. In one experiment, participants viewed ramps of varying widths and heights and described their willingness to ride each ramp, along with Pf and Pi. We found that Pf and Pi were independent predictors of willingness to attempt ramps. Moreover, the product Pf*Pi (the perceived risk for injury in attempting the ramp) was a stronger predictor than Pf or Pi alone. In a second experiment, participants viewed ramps of different widths, and reported the maximum (threshold) height where they would ride each ramp, along with Pf and Pi. We found that Pf*Pi at the threshold height, averaging 13%, did not vary with ramp width. We conclude that decisions on riding ramps are based on the product Pf*Pi. On average, riders refused to ride ramps when Pf*Pi exceeded 13%.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T00:21:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-944e9aae38e346ddb81d60d9faa998ae
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T00:21:29Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-944e9aae38e346ddb81d60d9faa998ae2023-12-12T05:34:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-12-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.12435361243536Perceived risk for falls and decision-making in riding raised ramps in mountain biking: a pilot studyEmily P. ChiltonStephen N. RobinovitchMountain biking (MTB) is a challenging activity where riders face constant decisions on whether to attempt technical paths or features (e.g., wooden ramps and jumps) that pose risk for falls and injuries. Risk homeostasis theory posits that riders pursue an optimal non-zero level of risk that balances the rewards of attempting challenging features with the need to avoid unreasonable risk for injury. Little is known on how riders judge risk, and the level of risk that riders deem unacceptable. We conducted experiments with experienced MTB riders (n = 17) to examine how their willingness to ride raised wooden ramps depended on their perceived probability for falling (Pf) and their perceived probability for injury in the event of a fall (Pi) while riding the ramp. In one experiment, participants viewed ramps of varying widths and heights and described their willingness to ride each ramp, along with Pf and Pi. We found that Pf and Pi were independent predictors of willingness to attempt ramps. Moreover, the product Pf*Pi (the perceived risk for injury in attempting the ramp) was a stronger predictor than Pf or Pi alone. In a second experiment, participants viewed ramps of different widths, and reported the maximum (threshold) height where they would ride each ramp, along with Pf and Pi. We found that Pf*Pi at the threshold height, averaging 13%, did not vary with ramp width. We conclude that decisions on riding ramps are based on the product Pf*Pi. On average, riders refused to ride ramps when Pf*Pi exceeded 13%.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1243536/fullbicyclingrisk-takingrisk perceptionfallsinjuryfear of falling
spellingShingle Emily P. Chilton
Stephen N. Robinovitch
Perceived risk for falls and decision-making in riding raised ramps in mountain biking: a pilot study
Frontiers in Psychology
bicycling
risk-taking
risk perception
falls
injury
fear of falling
title Perceived risk for falls and decision-making in riding raised ramps in mountain biking: a pilot study
title_full Perceived risk for falls and decision-making in riding raised ramps in mountain biking: a pilot study
title_fullStr Perceived risk for falls and decision-making in riding raised ramps in mountain biking: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Perceived risk for falls and decision-making in riding raised ramps in mountain biking: a pilot study
title_short Perceived risk for falls and decision-making in riding raised ramps in mountain biking: a pilot study
title_sort perceived risk for falls and decision making in riding raised ramps in mountain biking a pilot study
topic bicycling
risk-taking
risk perception
falls
injury
fear of falling
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1243536/full
work_keys_str_mv AT emilypchilton perceivedriskforfallsanddecisionmakinginridingraisedrampsinmountainbikingapilotstudy
AT stephennrobinovitch perceivedriskforfallsanddecisionmakinginridingraisedrampsinmountainbikingapilotstudy