Equivalent legibility font size for traditional Chinese character compared to early treatment diabetic retinopathy study near visual acuity

PURPOSES: To investigate the legibility of a standardized logarithmic print size of traditional Chinese (TC) characters and compare it with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) near chart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1243 commonly used TC characters were chosen and divided into t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chia-Yu Wang, Elizabeth P Shen, Shu-Ya Wu, Wei-Cherng Hsu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-tjo.org/article.asp?issn=2211-5056;year=2022;volume=12;issue=1;spage=68;epage=73;aulast=Wang
_version_ 1811339446938763264
author Chia-Yu Wang
Elizabeth P Shen
Shu-Ya Wu
Wei-Cherng Hsu
author_facet Chia-Yu Wang
Elizabeth P Shen
Shu-Ya Wu
Wei-Cherng Hsu
author_sort Chia-Yu Wang
collection DOAJ
description PURPOSES: To investigate the legibility of a standardized logarithmic print size of traditional Chinese (TC) characters and compare it with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) near chart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1243 commonly used TC characters were chosen and divided into three groups according to its stroke complexity: Group A with 2–9 strokes, Group B with 10–17 strokes, and Group C with 18–25 strokes. For each group of characters, near charts were created using randomly chosen characters arranged in decreasing logarithmic size. In a well-illuminated room, healthy controls were fully corrected to test both ETDRS near chart and our set of TC near charts. The smallest legible font sizes (SLFS) in TC near charts were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two healthy eyes (21 participants) (age 29 ± 8.9 years old) were included. The mean near best-corrected visual acuity (nBCVA) in ETDRS chart was 0.06 ± 0.05 logMAR. We found that the mean SLFS in TC charts (0.33 ± 0.09 logMAR) was significantly larger than the nBCVA in ETDRS chart (P < 0.001). The SLFS of Group B and the SLFS of Group C was significantly larger than that of Group A (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: According to our results, to recognize TC characters, normal-sight readers need a 0.22–0.30 logMAR (1.7–2.0 fold) enlargement of the acuity size measured by ETDRS near chart. The low-stroke TC charts may provide a new method to assess the postsurgical outcomes for comparable functional visual acuity in reading TC characters.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T18:26:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9450a2a6345e480c86798c179c83d746
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2211-5056
2211-5072
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T18:26:45Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-9450a2a6345e480c86798c179c83d7462022-12-22T02:35:13ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsTaiwan Journal of Ophthalmology2211-50562211-50722022-01-01121687310.4103/tjo.tjo_8_21Equivalent legibility font size for traditional Chinese character compared to early treatment diabetic retinopathy study near visual acuityChia-Yu WangElizabeth P ShenShu-Ya WuWei-Cherng HsuPURPOSES: To investigate the legibility of a standardized logarithmic print size of traditional Chinese (TC) characters and compare it with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) near chart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1243 commonly used TC characters were chosen and divided into three groups according to its stroke complexity: Group A with 2–9 strokes, Group B with 10–17 strokes, and Group C with 18–25 strokes. For each group of characters, near charts were created using randomly chosen characters arranged in decreasing logarithmic size. In a well-illuminated room, healthy controls were fully corrected to test both ETDRS near chart and our set of TC near charts. The smallest legible font sizes (SLFS) in TC near charts were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two healthy eyes (21 participants) (age 29 ± 8.9 years old) were included. The mean near best-corrected visual acuity (nBCVA) in ETDRS chart was 0.06 ± 0.05 logMAR. We found that the mean SLFS in TC charts (0.33 ± 0.09 logMAR) was significantly larger than the nBCVA in ETDRS chart (P < 0.001). The SLFS of Group B and the SLFS of Group C was significantly larger than that of Group A (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: According to our results, to recognize TC characters, normal-sight readers need a 0.22–0.30 logMAR (1.7–2.0 fold) enlargement of the acuity size measured by ETDRS near chart. The low-stroke TC charts may provide a new method to assess the postsurgical outcomes for comparable functional visual acuity in reading TC characters.http://www.e-tjo.org/article.asp?issn=2211-5056;year=2022;volume=12;issue=1;spage=68;epage=73;aulast=Wangcharacterearly treatment diabetic retinopathy study visual acuitylegibilitynear charttraditional chinese
spellingShingle Chia-Yu Wang
Elizabeth P Shen
Shu-Ya Wu
Wei-Cherng Hsu
Equivalent legibility font size for traditional Chinese character compared to early treatment diabetic retinopathy study near visual acuity
Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology
character
early treatment diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity
legibility
near chart
traditional chinese
title Equivalent legibility font size for traditional Chinese character compared to early treatment diabetic retinopathy study near visual acuity
title_full Equivalent legibility font size for traditional Chinese character compared to early treatment diabetic retinopathy study near visual acuity
title_fullStr Equivalent legibility font size for traditional Chinese character compared to early treatment diabetic retinopathy study near visual acuity
title_full_unstemmed Equivalent legibility font size for traditional Chinese character compared to early treatment diabetic retinopathy study near visual acuity
title_short Equivalent legibility font size for traditional Chinese character compared to early treatment diabetic retinopathy study near visual acuity
title_sort equivalent legibility font size for traditional chinese character compared to early treatment diabetic retinopathy study near visual acuity
topic character
early treatment diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity
legibility
near chart
traditional chinese
url http://www.e-tjo.org/article.asp?issn=2211-5056;year=2022;volume=12;issue=1;spage=68;epage=73;aulast=Wang
work_keys_str_mv AT chiayuwang equivalentlegibilityfontsizefortraditionalchinesecharactercomparedtoearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathystudynearvisualacuity
AT elizabethpshen equivalentlegibilityfontsizefortraditionalchinesecharactercomparedtoearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathystudynearvisualacuity
AT shuyawu equivalentlegibilityfontsizefortraditionalchinesecharactercomparedtoearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathystudynearvisualacuity
AT weichernghsu equivalentlegibilityfontsizefortraditionalchinesecharactercomparedtoearlytreatmentdiabeticretinopathystudynearvisualacuity