Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks

The European Noise Directive fixed a well-defined schedule on a five-year basis for the noise exposure evaluation of citizens. Noise monitoring is needed to validate noise maps of the main transportation infrastructures and it can also represent an improvement. By comparing with average noise maps,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matteo Bolognese, Stefano Carpita, Luca Fredianelli, Gaetano Licitra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Environments
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/10/4/61
_version_ 1797605520626941952
author Matteo Bolognese
Stefano Carpita
Luca Fredianelli
Gaetano Licitra
author_facet Matteo Bolognese
Stefano Carpita
Luca Fredianelli
Gaetano Licitra
author_sort Matteo Bolognese
collection DOAJ
description The European Noise Directive fixed a well-defined schedule on a five-year basis for the noise exposure evaluation of citizens. Noise monitoring is needed to validate noise maps of the main transportation infrastructures and it can also represent an improvement. By comparing with average noise maps, a properly set sensor network can report noise information in a more case-specific way, including time variations. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, key performance indicators (KPIs) evaluating the technical performance and financial sustainability of acoustic networks have never been presented in the scientific literature. Therefore, in the present work, a set of KPIs are proposed on the basis of KPIs defined for monitoring networks of other pollutants. It is then tuned according to noise monitoring, in line with the current legislations. As a case study, the performance of three monitoring networks installed in ports are evaluated and discussed. The resulting investment and maintenance costs can be helpful for decision makers to calculate the cost–benefits in the installation of new monitoring stations and also to evaluate the performance of the already-existing ones.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T05:02:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9457e0a3ded14c6b8d43fabcad25960d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3298
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T05:02:16Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Environments
spelling doaj.art-9457e0a3ded14c6b8d43fabcad25960d2023-11-17T19:09:59ZengMDPI AGEnvironments2076-32982023-04-011046110.3390/environments10040061Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring NetworksMatteo Bolognese0Stefano Carpita1Luca Fredianelli2Gaetano Licitra3Environmental Protection Agency of Tuscany Region (ARPAT), Pisa Department, Via Vittorio Veneto 27, 56127 Pisa, ItalyiPOOL S.r.l., Via Cocchi 7, 56121 Pisa, ItalyInstitute of Chemical and Physical Processes of National Research Council, Via G. Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, ItalyEnvironmental Protection Agency of Tuscany Region (ARPAT), Pisa Department, Via Vittorio Veneto 27, 56127 Pisa, ItalyThe European Noise Directive fixed a well-defined schedule on a five-year basis for the noise exposure evaluation of citizens. Noise monitoring is needed to validate noise maps of the main transportation infrastructures and it can also represent an improvement. By comparing with average noise maps, a properly set sensor network can report noise information in a more case-specific way, including time variations. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, key performance indicators (KPIs) evaluating the technical performance and financial sustainability of acoustic networks have never been presented in the scientific literature. Therefore, in the present work, a set of KPIs are proposed on the basis of KPIs defined for monitoring networks of other pollutants. It is then tuned according to noise monitoring, in line with the current legislations. As a case study, the performance of three monitoring networks installed in ports are evaluated and discussed. The resulting investment and maintenance costs can be helpful for decision makers to calculate the cost–benefits in the installation of new monitoring stations and also to evaluate the performance of the already-existing ones.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/10/4/61KPI (key performance indicator)port noiseenvironmental noisenoise monitoring airport noiseautonomous noise measurementsfinancial sustainability
spellingShingle Matteo Bolognese
Stefano Carpita
Luca Fredianelli
Gaetano Licitra
Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks
Environments
KPI (key performance indicator)
port noise
environmental noise
noise monitoring airport noise
autonomous noise measurements
financial sustainability
title Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks
title_full Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks
title_fullStr Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks
title_full_unstemmed Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks
title_short Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks
title_sort definition of key performance indicators for noise monitoring networks
topic KPI (key performance indicator)
port noise
environmental noise
noise monitoring airport noise
autonomous noise measurements
financial sustainability
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/10/4/61
work_keys_str_mv AT matteobolognese definitionofkeyperformanceindicatorsfornoisemonitoringnetworks
AT stefanocarpita definitionofkeyperformanceindicatorsfornoisemonitoringnetworks
AT lucafredianelli definitionofkeyperformanceindicatorsfornoisemonitoringnetworks
AT gaetanolicitra definitionofkeyperformanceindicatorsfornoisemonitoringnetworks