Leibniz on the existence of atoms

ABSTRACT In this paper I present and evaluate Leibniz’s two main arguments against the existence of atoms. In this context atoms are extended particles that are absolutely hard, homogeneous, indivisible, and indestructible by natural means. As we shall see, Leibniz’s arguments are flawed in a very i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ricardo Mena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Series:Manuscrito
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452017000200019&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1819102915517743104
author Ricardo Mena
author_facet Ricardo Mena
author_sort Ricardo Mena
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT In this paper I present and evaluate Leibniz’s two main arguments against the existence of atoms. In this context atoms are extended particles that are absolutely hard, homogeneous, indivisible, and indestructible by natural means. As we shall see, Leibniz’s arguments are flawed in a very instructive way. The first argument is in tension with the claim that God created the best possible world. The second argument overgeneralizes in an undesirable way. However, as I shall discuss in the last section of the paper, even if the arguments are somehow defective, at least the first one contributes valuable insights to contemporary metaphysics.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T01:42:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9460def8a1f64570b68aa9d5ba9d9bfc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2317-630X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T01:42:09Z
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
record_format Article
series Manuscrito
spelling doaj.art-9460def8a1f64570b68aa9d5ba9d9bfc2022-12-21T18:43:11ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasManuscrito2317-630X402193810.1590/0100-6045.2017.v40n2.rmS0100-60452017000200019Leibniz on the existence of atomsRicardo MenaABSTRACT In this paper I present and evaluate Leibniz’s two main arguments against the existence of atoms. In this context atoms are extended particles that are absolutely hard, homogeneous, indivisible, and indestructible by natural means. As we shall see, Leibniz’s arguments are flawed in a very instructive way. The first argument is in tension with the claim that God created the best possible world. The second argument overgeneralizes in an undesirable way. However, as I shall discuss in the last section of the paper, even if the arguments are somehow defective, at least the first one contributes valuable insights to contemporary metaphysics.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452017000200019&lng=en&tlng=enLeibnizHistory of PhilosophyMetaphysics
spellingShingle Ricardo Mena
Leibniz on the existence of atoms
Manuscrito
Leibniz
History of Philosophy
Metaphysics
title Leibniz on the existence of atoms
title_full Leibniz on the existence of atoms
title_fullStr Leibniz on the existence of atoms
title_full_unstemmed Leibniz on the existence of atoms
title_short Leibniz on the existence of atoms
title_sort leibniz on the existence of atoms
topic Leibniz
History of Philosophy
Metaphysics
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452017000200019&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT ricardomena leibnizontheexistenceofatoms