Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia

Objective We hypothesized that ultrasound (US)-guided technique of the supra- and infraclavicular and axillary approaches of brachial plexus block (BPB) will produce a high quality of surgical anesthesia for operations below the shoulder independently of the approach and body mass index (BMI). Inte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anatoli Stav, Leonid Reytman, Michael-Yohay Stav, Isaak Portnoy, Alexander Kantarovsky, Offer Galili, Shmuel Luboshitz, Roger Sevi, Ahud Sternberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rambam Health Care Campus 2016-04-01
Series:Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rmmj.org.il/Pages/ArticleHTM.aspx?manuId=537
_version_ 1798044997141921792
author Anatoli Stav
Leonid Reytman
Michael-Yohay Stav
Isaak Portnoy
Alexander Kantarovsky
Offer Galili
Shmuel Luboshitz
Roger Sevi
Ahud Sternberg
author_facet Anatoli Stav
Leonid Reytman
Michael-Yohay Stav
Isaak Portnoy
Alexander Kantarovsky
Offer Galili
Shmuel Luboshitz
Roger Sevi
Ahud Sternberg
author_sort Anatoli Stav
collection DOAJ
description Objective We hypothesized that ultrasound (US)-guided technique of the supra- and infraclavicular and axillary approaches of brachial plexus block (BPB) will produce a high quality of surgical anesthesia for operations below the shoulder independently of the approach and body mass index (BMI). Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves will be blocked separately because they are not a part of the brachial plexus. Methods This is a prospective randomized observer-blinded study. The three approaches of the US-guided BPB without neurostimulation were compared for quality, performance time, and correlation between performance time and BMI. Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerve blocks were used in all patients. Results A total of 101 patients were randomized into three groups: SCL (supraclavicular), ICL (infraclavicular), and AX (axillary). Seven patients were excluded due to various factors. All three groups were similar in demographic data, M:F proportion, preoperative diagnosis and type of surgery, anesthesiologists who performed the block, and surgical staff that performed the surgical intervention. The time between the end of the block performance and the start of the operation was also similar. The quality of the surgical anesthesia and discomfort during the operation were identical following comparison between groups. No direct positive correlation was observed between BMI and the block performance time. The time for the axillary block was slightly longer than the time for the supra- and infraclavicular approaches, but it had no practical clinical significance. Transient Horner syndrome was observed in three patients in the SCL group. No other adverse effects or complications were observed. Conclusions All three approaches can be used for US-guided BPB with similar quality of surgical anesthesia for operations of below the shoulder. A block of the intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves is recommended. Obesity is not a significant factor in relation to the time of US-guided BPB performance, or the quality of surgical anesthesia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01442558.)
first_indexed 2024-04-11T23:13:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-946c976ea5d04e7e942d6dcd0afbb5f0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-9172
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T23:13:25Z
publishDate 2016-04-01
publisher Rambam Health Care Campus
record_format Article
series Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-946c976ea5d04e7e942d6dcd0afbb5f02022-12-22T03:57:44ZengRambam Health Care CampusRambam Maimonides Medical Journal2076-91722016-04-0172e001310.5041/RMMJ.10240Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical AnesthesiaAnatoli Stav0Leonid Reytman1Michael-Yohay Stav2Isaak Portnoy3Alexander Kantarovsky4Offer Galili5Shmuel Luboshitz6Roger Sevi7Ahud Sternberg81Postanesthesia Care Unit, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, and The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, IsraelThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, and Department of Anesthesiology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, IsraelThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, IsraelThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, and Vascular Surgery Unit, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, IsraelThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, and Vascular Surgery Unit, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, IsraelThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, and Vascular Surgery Unit, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, IsraelThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, and Orthopedic Hand Surgery Unit, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, IsraelThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, and Department of Orthopedics A, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, IsraelThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, and Department of Surgery A, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, IsraelObjective We hypothesized that ultrasound (US)-guided technique of the supra- and infraclavicular and axillary approaches of brachial plexus block (BPB) will produce a high quality of surgical anesthesia for operations below the shoulder independently of the approach and body mass index (BMI). Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves will be blocked separately because they are not a part of the brachial plexus. Methods This is a prospective randomized observer-blinded study. The three approaches of the US-guided BPB without neurostimulation were compared for quality, performance time, and correlation between performance time and BMI. Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerve blocks were used in all patients. Results A total of 101 patients were randomized into three groups: SCL (supraclavicular), ICL (infraclavicular), and AX (axillary). Seven patients were excluded due to various factors. All three groups were similar in demographic data, M:F proportion, preoperative diagnosis and type of surgery, anesthesiologists who performed the block, and surgical staff that performed the surgical intervention. The time between the end of the block performance and the start of the operation was also similar. The quality of the surgical anesthesia and discomfort during the operation were identical following comparison between groups. No direct positive correlation was observed between BMI and the block performance time. The time for the axillary block was slightly longer than the time for the supra- and infraclavicular approaches, but it had no practical clinical significance. Transient Horner syndrome was observed in three patients in the SCL group. No other adverse effects or complications were observed. Conclusions All three approaches can be used for US-guided BPB with similar quality of surgical anesthesia for operations of below the shoulder. A block of the intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves is recommended. Obesity is not a significant factor in relation to the time of US-guided BPB performance, or the quality of surgical anesthesia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01442558.)http://rmmj.org.il/Pages/ArticleHTM.aspx?manuId=537Axillarybrachial plexus blockinfraclavicularregional anesthesiasupraclavicularsurgical anesthesiaultrasound-guided
spellingShingle Anatoli Stav
Leonid Reytman
Michael-Yohay Stav
Isaak Portnoy
Alexander Kantarovsky
Offer Galili
Shmuel Luboshitz
Roger Sevi
Ahud Sternberg
Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal
Axillary
brachial plexus block
infraclavicular
regional anesthesia
supraclavicular
surgical anesthesia
ultrasound-guided
title Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
title_full Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
title_fullStr Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
title_short Comparison of the Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular and Axillary Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
title_sort comparison of the supraclavicular infraclavicular and axillary approaches for ultrasound guided brachial plexus block for surgical anesthesia
topic Axillary
brachial plexus block
infraclavicular
regional anesthesia
supraclavicular
surgical anesthesia
ultrasound-guided
url http://rmmj.org.il/Pages/ArticleHTM.aspx?manuId=537
work_keys_str_mv AT anatolistav comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT leonidreytman comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT michaelyohaystav comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT isaakportnoy comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT alexanderkantarovsky comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT offergalili comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT shmuelluboshitz comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT rogersevi comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia
AT ahudsternberg comparisonofthesupraclavicularinfraclavicularandaxillaryapproachesforultrasoundguidedbrachialplexusblockforsurgicalanesthesia