Ureteral stricture formation after removal of proximal ureteral stone: retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy

Objective To compare the risk of postoperative ureteral stricture formation following retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPLU) and ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy (URSL) in patients with proximal ureteral stones. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henglong Hu, Lu Xu, Shaogang Wang, Xiao Yu, Huan Yang, Ejun Peng, Lei Cui, Cong Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2017-06-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/3483.pdf
_version_ 1827606303331057664
author Henglong Hu
Lu Xu
Shaogang Wang
Xiao Yu
Huan Yang
Ejun Peng
Lei Cui
Cong Li
author_facet Henglong Hu
Lu Xu
Shaogang Wang
Xiao Yu
Huan Yang
Ejun Peng
Lei Cui
Cong Li
author_sort Henglong Hu
collection DOAJ
description Objective To compare the risk of postoperative ureteral stricture formation following retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPLU) and ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy (URSL) in patients with proximal ureteral stones. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent RPLU or URSL for proximal ureteral stones between April 2011 and May 2015. Patients were allocated into URSL group or RPLU group and the outcomes were compared. Results A total of 201 patients who underwent 209 procedures including 159 URSL and 50 RPLU with a median follow-up of 30 months were included. No significant difference was observed among the two groups in most baseline parameters, while the stone size was significantly larger in the RPLU group (11.37 ± 2.97 vs 14.04 ± 4.38 mm, p = 0.000). Patients in RPLU group had markedly longer operative time (p = 0.000) and longer postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.000). The initial and one-month stone-free rates were significantly higher in the RPLU group (78.6% vs 100%, p = 0.000 and 82.4% vs 100%, p = 0.001, respectively). Patients in the RPLU had a higher complication rate (18.0% vs 9.4%, p = 0.098) and lower ureteral stricture rate (2.5% vs 2.0%, p = 1.000), while the difference was not significant. Further logistic regression model identified RPLU and female sex as independent risk factors for postoperative complication (Odds Ratio[OR] = 3.57, p = 0.035 and OR = 3.57, p = 0.025, respectively); however, URSL was not an independent risk factor for the formation of postoperative ureteral stricture after adjusting confounding variables (OR = 0.90, p = 0.935). Conclusion RPLU and URSL have similar postoperative ureteral stricture formation risks. RPLU can provide significantly higher stone clearance rate, but relates with more postoperative complications.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:35:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-948caf2aa9844dd9a7a146699b25439c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:35:19Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-948caf2aa9844dd9a7a146699b25439c2023-12-03T10:59:30ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592017-06-015e348310.7717/peerj.3483Ureteral stricture formation after removal of proximal ureteral stone: retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsyHenglong Hu0Lu Xu1Shaogang Wang2Xiao Yu3Huan Yang4Ejun Peng5Lei Cui6Cong Li7Department and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment and Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of ChinaObjective To compare the risk of postoperative ureteral stricture formation following retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPLU) and ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy (URSL) in patients with proximal ureteral stones. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent RPLU or URSL for proximal ureteral stones between April 2011 and May 2015. Patients were allocated into URSL group or RPLU group and the outcomes were compared. Results A total of 201 patients who underwent 209 procedures including 159 URSL and 50 RPLU with a median follow-up of 30 months were included. No significant difference was observed among the two groups in most baseline parameters, while the stone size was significantly larger in the RPLU group (11.37 ± 2.97 vs 14.04 ± 4.38 mm, p = 0.000). Patients in RPLU group had markedly longer operative time (p = 0.000) and longer postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.000). The initial and one-month stone-free rates were significantly higher in the RPLU group (78.6% vs 100%, p = 0.000 and 82.4% vs 100%, p = 0.001, respectively). Patients in the RPLU had a higher complication rate (18.0% vs 9.4%, p = 0.098) and lower ureteral stricture rate (2.5% vs 2.0%, p = 1.000), while the difference was not significant. Further logistic regression model identified RPLU and female sex as independent risk factors for postoperative complication (Odds Ratio[OR] = 3.57, p = 0.035 and OR = 3.57, p = 0.025, respectively); however, URSL was not an independent risk factor for the formation of postoperative ureteral stricture after adjusting confounding variables (OR = 0.90, p = 0.935). Conclusion RPLU and URSL have similar postoperative ureteral stricture formation risks. RPLU can provide significantly higher stone clearance rate, but relates with more postoperative complications.https://peerj.com/articles/3483.pdfUreteral strictureUreteral stoneUreteroscopyLaparoscopic ureterolithotomyLaserUrolithiasis
spellingShingle Henglong Hu
Lu Xu
Shaogang Wang
Xiao Yu
Huan Yang
Ejun Peng
Lei Cui
Cong Li
Ureteral stricture formation after removal of proximal ureteral stone: retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy
PeerJ
Ureteral stricture
Ureteral stone
Ureteroscopy
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy
Laser
Urolithiasis
title Ureteral stricture formation after removal of proximal ureteral stone: retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy
title_full Ureteral stricture formation after removal of proximal ureteral stone: retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy
title_fullStr Ureteral stricture formation after removal of proximal ureteral stone: retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy
title_full_unstemmed Ureteral stricture formation after removal of proximal ureteral stone: retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy
title_short Ureteral stricture formation after removal of proximal ureteral stone: retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy
title_sort ureteral stricture formation after removal of proximal ureteral stone retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopy with holmium yag laser lithotripsy
topic Ureteral stricture
Ureteral stone
Ureteroscopy
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy
Laser
Urolithiasis
url https://peerj.com/articles/3483.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT henglonghu ureteralstrictureformationafterremovalofproximalureteralstoneretroperitoneallaparoscopicureterolithotomyversusureteroscopywithholmiumyaglaserlithotripsy
AT luxu ureteralstrictureformationafterremovalofproximalureteralstoneretroperitoneallaparoscopicureterolithotomyversusureteroscopywithholmiumyaglaserlithotripsy
AT shaogangwang ureteralstrictureformationafterremovalofproximalureteralstoneretroperitoneallaparoscopicureterolithotomyversusureteroscopywithholmiumyaglaserlithotripsy
AT xiaoyu ureteralstrictureformationafterremovalofproximalureteralstoneretroperitoneallaparoscopicureterolithotomyversusureteroscopywithholmiumyaglaserlithotripsy
AT huanyang ureteralstrictureformationafterremovalofproximalureteralstoneretroperitoneallaparoscopicureterolithotomyversusureteroscopywithholmiumyaglaserlithotripsy
AT ejunpeng ureteralstrictureformationafterremovalofproximalureteralstoneretroperitoneallaparoscopicureterolithotomyversusureteroscopywithholmiumyaglaserlithotripsy
AT leicui ureteralstrictureformationafterremovalofproximalureteralstoneretroperitoneallaparoscopicureterolithotomyversusureteroscopywithholmiumyaglaserlithotripsy
AT congli ureteralstrictureformationafterremovalofproximalureteralstoneretroperitoneallaparoscopicureterolithotomyversusureteroscopywithholmiumyaglaserlithotripsy