Quantifying the Surface Strain Field Induced by Active Sources with Distributed Acoustic Sensing: Theory and Practice

Quantitative dynamic strain measurements of the ground would be useful for engineering scale problems such as monitoring for natural hazards, soil-structure interaction studies, and non-invasive site investigation using full waveform inversion (FWI). Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), a promising t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter G. Hubbard, Joseph P. Vantassel, Brady R. Cox, James W. Rector, Michael B. S. Yust, Kenichi Soga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/12/4589
_version_ 1797482352526491648
author Peter G. Hubbard
Joseph P. Vantassel
Brady R. Cox
James W. Rector
Michael B. S. Yust
Kenichi Soga
author_facet Peter G. Hubbard
Joseph P. Vantassel
Brady R. Cox
James W. Rector
Michael B. S. Yust
Kenichi Soga
author_sort Peter G. Hubbard
collection DOAJ
description Quantitative dynamic strain measurements of the ground would be useful for engineering scale problems such as monitoring for natural hazards, soil-structure interaction studies, and non-invasive site investigation using full waveform inversion (FWI). Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), a promising technology for these purposes, needs to be better understood in terms of its directional sensitivity, spatial position, and amplitude for application to engineering-scale problems. This study investigates whether the physical measurements made using DAS are consistent with the theoretical transfer function, reception patterns, and experimental measurements of ground strain made by geophones. Results show that DAS and geophone measurements are consistent in both phase and amplitude for broadband (10 s of Hz), high amplitude (10 s of microstrain), and complex wavefields originating from different positions around the array when: (1) the DAS channels and geophone locations are properly aligned, (2) the DAS cable provides good deformation coupling to the internal optical fiber, (3) the cable is coupled to the ground through direct burial and compaction, and (4) laser frequency drift is mitigated in the DAS measurements. The transfer function of DAS arrays is presented considering the gauge length, pulse shape, and cable design. The theoretical relationship between DAS-measured and pointwise strain for vertical and horizontal active sources is introduced using 3D elastic finite-difference simulations. The implications of using DAS strain measurements are discussed including directionality and magnitude differences between the actual and DAS-measured strain fields. Estimating measurement quality based on the wavelength-to-gauge length ratio for field data is demonstrated. A method for spatially aligning the DAS channels with the geophone locations at tolerances less than the spatial resolution of a DAS system is proposed.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:32:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-94a7924954f64b3084b1aade92b251dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:32:04Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-94a7924954f64b3084b1aade92b251dd2023-11-23T18:55:45ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-06-012212458910.3390/s22124589Quantifying the Surface Strain Field Induced by Active Sources with Distributed Acoustic Sensing: Theory and PracticePeter G. Hubbard0Joseph P. Vantassel1Brady R. Cox2James W. Rector3Michael B. S. Yust4Kenichi Soga5Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USADepartment of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USADepartment of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USAQuantitative dynamic strain measurements of the ground would be useful for engineering scale problems such as monitoring for natural hazards, soil-structure interaction studies, and non-invasive site investigation using full waveform inversion (FWI). Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), a promising technology for these purposes, needs to be better understood in terms of its directional sensitivity, spatial position, and amplitude for application to engineering-scale problems. This study investigates whether the physical measurements made using DAS are consistent with the theoretical transfer function, reception patterns, and experimental measurements of ground strain made by geophones. Results show that DAS and geophone measurements are consistent in both phase and amplitude for broadband (10 s of Hz), high amplitude (10 s of microstrain), and complex wavefields originating from different positions around the array when: (1) the DAS channels and geophone locations are properly aligned, (2) the DAS cable provides good deformation coupling to the internal optical fiber, (3) the cable is coupled to the ground through direct burial and compaction, and (4) laser frequency drift is mitigated in the DAS measurements. The transfer function of DAS arrays is presented considering the gauge length, pulse shape, and cable design. The theoretical relationship between DAS-measured and pointwise strain for vertical and horizontal active sources is introduced using 3D elastic finite-difference simulations. The implications of using DAS strain measurements are discussed including directionality and magnitude differences between the actual and DAS-measured strain fields. Estimating measurement quality based on the wavelength-to-gauge length ratio for field data is demonstrated. A method for spatially aligning the DAS channels with the geophone locations at tolerances less than the spatial resolution of a DAS system is proposed.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/12/4589DASgeophonestransfer functionwave propagationstrain measurementDFOS
spellingShingle Peter G. Hubbard
Joseph P. Vantassel
Brady R. Cox
James W. Rector
Michael B. S. Yust
Kenichi Soga
Quantifying the Surface Strain Field Induced by Active Sources with Distributed Acoustic Sensing: Theory and Practice
Sensors
DAS
geophones
transfer function
wave propagation
strain measurement
DFOS
title Quantifying the Surface Strain Field Induced by Active Sources with Distributed Acoustic Sensing: Theory and Practice
title_full Quantifying the Surface Strain Field Induced by Active Sources with Distributed Acoustic Sensing: Theory and Practice
title_fullStr Quantifying the Surface Strain Field Induced by Active Sources with Distributed Acoustic Sensing: Theory and Practice
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the Surface Strain Field Induced by Active Sources with Distributed Acoustic Sensing: Theory and Practice
title_short Quantifying the Surface Strain Field Induced by Active Sources with Distributed Acoustic Sensing: Theory and Practice
title_sort quantifying the surface strain field induced by active sources with distributed acoustic sensing theory and practice
topic DAS
geophones
transfer function
wave propagation
strain measurement
DFOS
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/12/4589
work_keys_str_mv AT peterghubbard quantifyingthesurfacestrainfieldinducedbyactivesourceswithdistributedacousticsensingtheoryandpractice
AT josephpvantassel quantifyingthesurfacestrainfieldinducedbyactivesourceswithdistributedacousticsensingtheoryandpractice
AT bradyrcox quantifyingthesurfacestrainfieldinducedbyactivesourceswithdistributedacousticsensingtheoryandpractice
AT jameswrector quantifyingthesurfacestrainfieldinducedbyactivesourceswithdistributedacousticsensingtheoryandpractice
AT michaelbsyust quantifyingthesurfacestrainfieldinducedbyactivesourceswithdistributedacousticsensingtheoryandpractice
AT kenichisoga quantifyingthesurfacestrainfieldinducedbyactivesourceswithdistributedacousticsensingtheoryandpractice