Comparison between manual aiming control and sex in different task constraints

Abstract AIMS This study aimed to investigate the comparison between sex and manual aiming control in different cognitive and motor constraints of the task. METHODS Eighty-four right-handed participants (42 women) performed 110 trials of a manual aiming task with a non-inking pen on a digitizing t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lidiane Aparecida Fernandes, Herbert Ugrinowisch, João Roberto Ventura de Oliveira, Mayndra Giusti Salvador, Lucas Eduardo Antunes Bicalho, Guilherme Menezes Lage
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) 2018-02-01
Series:Motriz: Revista de Educacao Fisica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742017000300328&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811292005453529088
author Lidiane Aparecida Fernandes
Herbert Ugrinowisch
João Roberto Ventura de Oliveira
Mayndra Giusti Salvador
Lucas Eduardo Antunes Bicalho
Guilherme Menezes Lage
author_facet Lidiane Aparecida Fernandes
Herbert Ugrinowisch
João Roberto Ventura de Oliveira
Mayndra Giusti Salvador
Lucas Eduardo Antunes Bicalho
Guilherme Menezes Lage
author_sort Lidiane Aparecida Fernandes
collection DOAJ
description Abstract AIMS This study aimed to investigate the comparison between sex and manual aiming control in different cognitive and motor constraints of the task. METHODS Eighty-four right-handed participants (42 women) performed 110 trials of a manual aiming task with a non-inking pen on a digitizing tablet. The aiming task required four different conditions of execution. The control condition appeared on the computer screen in 70% of the trials, and the other three conditions, (a) distractor, (b) inhibition of response and (c) higher index of difficulty, each appeared in 10% of the trials. RESULTS Compared with women, men produced shorter movement and response times, as well as higher peak velocity in the control and distractor conditions. When the index of difficulty of the task increased, men produced only higher peak velocity. Women produced more corrective movements to achieve the target only in the control condition. CONCLUSION Our results corroborate those of previous studies that indicate sex-specific response strategies when the sensory motor system is challenged by different task constraints.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T04:38:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-94a94f1de151413987409175894162e7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1980-6574
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T04:38:01Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
record_format Article
series Motriz: Revista de Educacao Fisica
spelling doaj.art-94a94f1de151413987409175894162e72022-12-22T03:02:06ZengUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Motriz: Revista de Educacao Fisica1980-65742018-02-0123310.1590/s1980-6574201700030029S1980-65742017000300328Comparison between manual aiming control and sex in different task constraintsLidiane Aparecida FernandesHerbert UgrinowischJoão Roberto Ventura de OliveiraMayndra Giusti SalvadorLucas Eduardo Antunes BicalhoGuilherme Menezes LageAbstract AIMS This study aimed to investigate the comparison between sex and manual aiming control in different cognitive and motor constraints of the task. METHODS Eighty-four right-handed participants (42 women) performed 110 trials of a manual aiming task with a non-inking pen on a digitizing tablet. The aiming task required four different conditions of execution. The control condition appeared on the computer screen in 70% of the trials, and the other three conditions, (a) distractor, (b) inhibition of response and (c) higher index of difficulty, each appeared in 10% of the trials. RESULTS Compared with women, men produced shorter movement and response times, as well as higher peak velocity in the control and distractor conditions. When the index of difficulty of the task increased, men produced only higher peak velocity. Women produced more corrective movements to achieve the target only in the control condition. CONCLUSION Our results corroborate those of previous studies that indicate sex-specific response strategies when the sensory motor system is challenged by different task constraints.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742017000300328&lng=en&tlng=enmotor skillsmenwomentask performancegoal-directed movement
spellingShingle Lidiane Aparecida Fernandes
Herbert Ugrinowisch
João Roberto Ventura de Oliveira
Mayndra Giusti Salvador
Lucas Eduardo Antunes Bicalho
Guilherme Menezes Lage
Comparison between manual aiming control and sex in different task constraints
Motriz: Revista de Educacao Fisica
motor skills
men
women
task performance
goal-directed movement
title Comparison between manual aiming control and sex in different task constraints
title_full Comparison between manual aiming control and sex in different task constraints
title_fullStr Comparison between manual aiming control and sex in different task constraints
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between manual aiming control and sex in different task constraints
title_short Comparison between manual aiming control and sex in different task constraints
title_sort comparison between manual aiming control and sex in different task constraints
topic motor skills
men
women
task performance
goal-directed movement
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742017000300328&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT lidianeaparecidafernandes comparisonbetweenmanualaimingcontrolandsexindifferenttaskconstraints
AT herbertugrinowisch comparisonbetweenmanualaimingcontrolandsexindifferenttaskconstraints
AT joaorobertoventuradeoliveira comparisonbetweenmanualaimingcontrolandsexindifferenttaskconstraints
AT mayndragiustisalvador comparisonbetweenmanualaimingcontrolandsexindifferenttaskconstraints
AT lucaseduardoantunesbicalho comparisonbetweenmanualaimingcontrolandsexindifferenttaskconstraints
AT guilhermemenezeslage comparisonbetweenmanualaimingcontrolandsexindifferenttaskconstraints