Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in New Therapeutic Lung Cancer Trials
Background: Double reads in blinded independent central reviews (BICRs) are recommended to control the quality of trials but they are prone to discordances. We analyzed inter-reader discordances in a pool of lung cancer trials using RECIST 1.1. Methods: We analyzed six lung cancer BICR trials that i...
Main Authors: | Hubert Beaumont, Antoine Iannessi, Yi Wang, Charles M. Voyton, Jennifer Cillario, Yan Liu |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Cancers |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/18/4533 |
Similar Items
-
Breaking down the RECIST 1.1 double read variability in lung trials: What do baseline assessments tell us?
by: Antoine Iannessi, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Can we predict discordant RECIST 1.1 evaluations in double read clinical trials?
by: Hubert Beaumont, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
RECIST 1.1 and lesion selection: How to deal with ambiguity at baseline?
by: Antoine Iannessi, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging diagnostic merits in the post-therapeutic assessment of musculoskeletal soft tissue sarcoma
by: Amr Farouk Ibrahim Moustafa, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Immunotherapy Assessment: A New Paradigm for Radiologists
by: Vincenza Granata, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)