An analysis of TIMSS 2015 science reading demands

This study investigated the reading demands of restricted-use items administered to South African grade 9 learners as part of the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2015. The method proposed by Mullis, Martin and Foy (2013) was used to categorise items into low, medium an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Surette van Staden, Marien Graham, Jaqueline Harvey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2020-12-01
Series:Perspectives in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://196.255.246.28/index.php/pie/article/view/4338
Description
Summary:This study investigated the reading demands of restricted-use items administered to South African grade 9 learners as part of the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2015. The method proposed by Mullis, Martin and Foy (2013) was used to categorise items into low, medium and high readability groups. The ‘knowing’ domain contained mostly low readability items; the ‘applying’ domain was almost equally medium and high readability items; with the ‘reasoning’ domain containing mostly high readability items. Results show significant differences between the percentage of correct answers between the low and high categories and between the medium and high categories. However, the impact of reading demand on performance cannot be fully analysed without cross-reference to English proficiency. Nevertheless, the higher the readability, the greater the chance is for learners to answer incorrectly. A continued expected low performance for most South African learners is implied.
ISSN:0258-2236
2519-593X