Effects of media stories of hope and recovery on suicidal ideation and help-seeking attitudes and intentions: systematic review and meta-analysis

Summary: Background: There is strong evidence that suicides increase after media stories about suicides by celebrities, particularly those that highlight the suicide method (the Werther effect). Much less is known about the Papageno effect—the protective effects of media stories of hope and recover...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, PhD, Benedikt Till, DSc, Stefanie Kirchner, MPH, Mark Sinyor, MD, Marlies Braun, MPhil, Jane Pirkis, ProfPhD, Ulrich S Tran, DSc, Martin Voracek, ProfPhD, Florian Arendt, PhD, Maria Ftanou, PhD, Reka Kovacs, MSc, Kylie King, PhD, Marisa Schlichthorst, PhD, Steven Stack, ProfPhD, Matthew J Spittal, ProfPhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-02-01
Series:The Lancet Public Health
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468266721002747
_version_ 1819291664692281344
author Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, PhD
Benedikt Till, DSc
Stefanie Kirchner, MPH
Mark Sinyor, MD
Marlies Braun, MPhil
Jane Pirkis, ProfPhD
Ulrich S Tran, DSc
Martin Voracek, ProfPhD
Florian Arendt, PhD
Maria Ftanou, PhD
Reka Kovacs, MSc
Kylie King, PhD
Marisa Schlichthorst, PhD
Steven Stack, ProfPhD
Matthew J Spittal, ProfPhD
author_facet Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, PhD
Benedikt Till, DSc
Stefanie Kirchner, MPH
Mark Sinyor, MD
Marlies Braun, MPhil
Jane Pirkis, ProfPhD
Ulrich S Tran, DSc
Martin Voracek, ProfPhD
Florian Arendt, PhD
Maria Ftanou, PhD
Reka Kovacs, MSc
Kylie King, PhD
Marisa Schlichthorst, PhD
Steven Stack, ProfPhD
Matthew J Spittal, ProfPhD
author_sort Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, PhD
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Background: There is strong evidence that suicides increase after media stories about suicides by celebrities, particularly those that highlight the suicide method (the Werther effect). Much less is known about the Papageno effect—the protective effects of media stories of hope and recovery from suicidal crises. A synthesis of the retrievable evidence is lacking. We aim to summarise findings from randomised controlled trials about the effects of stories of hope and recovery on individuals with some degree of vulnerability to suicide. Methods: For this systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, we searched PubMed (including MEDLINE), Scopus, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar published from inception to Sept 6, 2021, without language restrictions. We included trials that reported suicidal ideation (the primary outcome) or help-seeking attitudes or intentions (the secondary outcome) and tested a media narrative of hope and recovery. Studies were excluded if they did not feature a clearly positive story of hope and recovery, or had a control group exposed to suicide-related stimulus material. We contacted the lead or senior authors of all original studies to obtain participant-level data for this study. The primary analysis was restricted to individuals with some vulnerability to suicide. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. The study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020221341. Findings: Our search yielded 7347 records. 3920 records were screened by title and abstract, and 25 full-text records assessed for eligibility. There were eight eligible studies with 2350 participants for which individual participant data were sought. For suicidal ideation, six studies met the inclusion criteria for the primary analysis. Follow-up responses were available for 569 (90%) of 633 participants who were randomised with high vulnerability (345 [55%] allocated to the intervention group and 288 [45%] to the control group). The pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) indicated a small reduction in suicidal ideation of –0·22 (95% CI –0·39 to –0·04, p=0·017; six studies) in the intervention group. For help-seeking attitudes and intentions, four studies met the inclusion criteria and follow-up data were available for 362 (86%) of 420 participants (247 [59%] allocated to the intervention group and 173 [41%] to the control group). The pooled SMD showed no evidence of a difference between the groups (SMD=0·14, 95% CI –0·15 to 0·43, p=0·35; four studies). Low levels of cross-study heterogeneity effects were observed for both analyses (I2=5% [suicidal ideation] and I2=36% [help-seeking attitudes and intentions]). We found no evidence of publication bias. Interpretation: Media narratives of hope and recovery from suicidal crises appear to have a beneficial effect on suicidal ideation in individuals with some vulnerability, but there is insufficient evidence regarding help-seeking attitudes and intentions. These findings provide new evidence about narratives for suicide prevention. Funding: None.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T03:42:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-94c51b288e354a328c6bc169db5b7d1b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2468-2667
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T03:42:14Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series The Lancet Public Health
spelling doaj.art-94c51b288e354a328c6bc169db5b7d1b2022-12-21T17:16:52ZengElsevierThe Lancet Public Health2468-26672022-02-0172e156e168Effects of media stories of hope and recovery on suicidal ideation and help-seeking attitudes and intentions: systematic review and meta-analysisThomas Niederkrotenthaler, PhD0Benedikt Till, DSc1Stefanie Kirchner, MPH2Mark Sinyor, MD3Marlies Braun, MPhil4Jane Pirkis, ProfPhD5Ulrich S Tran, DSc6Martin Voracek, ProfPhD7Florian Arendt, PhD8Maria Ftanou, PhD9Reka Kovacs, MSc10Kylie King, PhD11Marisa Schlichthorst, PhD12Steven Stack, ProfPhD13Matthew J Spittal, ProfPhD14Unit Suicide Research & Mental Health Promotion, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Wiener Werkstaette for Suicide Research, Vienna, Austria; Correspondence to: Dr Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna A-1090, AustriaUnit Suicide Research & Mental Health Promotion, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Wiener Werkstaette for Suicide Research, Vienna, AustriaUnit Suicide Research & Mental Health Promotion, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Wiener Werkstaette for Suicide Research, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaUnit Suicide Research & Mental Health Promotion, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Wiener Werkstaette for Suicide Research, Vienna, AustriaCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaWiener Werkstaette for Suicide Research, Vienna, Austria; School of Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaWiener Werkstaette for Suicide Research, Vienna, Austria; School of Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaWiener Werkstaette for Suicide Research, Vienna, Austria; Department of Communication, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaWiener Werkstaette for Suicide Research, Vienna, Austria; School of Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Criminology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USACentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaSummary: Background: There is strong evidence that suicides increase after media stories about suicides by celebrities, particularly those that highlight the suicide method (the Werther effect). Much less is known about the Papageno effect—the protective effects of media stories of hope and recovery from suicidal crises. A synthesis of the retrievable evidence is lacking. We aim to summarise findings from randomised controlled trials about the effects of stories of hope and recovery on individuals with some degree of vulnerability to suicide. Methods: For this systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, we searched PubMed (including MEDLINE), Scopus, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar published from inception to Sept 6, 2021, without language restrictions. We included trials that reported suicidal ideation (the primary outcome) or help-seeking attitudes or intentions (the secondary outcome) and tested a media narrative of hope and recovery. Studies were excluded if they did not feature a clearly positive story of hope and recovery, or had a control group exposed to suicide-related stimulus material. We contacted the lead or senior authors of all original studies to obtain participant-level data for this study. The primary analysis was restricted to individuals with some vulnerability to suicide. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. The study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020221341. Findings: Our search yielded 7347 records. 3920 records were screened by title and abstract, and 25 full-text records assessed for eligibility. There were eight eligible studies with 2350 participants for which individual participant data were sought. For suicidal ideation, six studies met the inclusion criteria for the primary analysis. Follow-up responses were available for 569 (90%) of 633 participants who were randomised with high vulnerability (345 [55%] allocated to the intervention group and 288 [45%] to the control group). The pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) indicated a small reduction in suicidal ideation of –0·22 (95% CI –0·39 to –0·04, p=0·017; six studies) in the intervention group. For help-seeking attitudes and intentions, four studies met the inclusion criteria and follow-up data were available for 362 (86%) of 420 participants (247 [59%] allocated to the intervention group and 173 [41%] to the control group). The pooled SMD showed no evidence of a difference between the groups (SMD=0·14, 95% CI –0·15 to 0·43, p=0·35; four studies). Low levels of cross-study heterogeneity effects were observed for both analyses (I2=5% [suicidal ideation] and I2=36% [help-seeking attitudes and intentions]). We found no evidence of publication bias. Interpretation: Media narratives of hope and recovery from suicidal crises appear to have a beneficial effect on suicidal ideation in individuals with some vulnerability, but there is insufficient evidence regarding help-seeking attitudes and intentions. These findings provide new evidence about narratives for suicide prevention. Funding: None.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468266721002747
spellingShingle Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, PhD
Benedikt Till, DSc
Stefanie Kirchner, MPH
Mark Sinyor, MD
Marlies Braun, MPhil
Jane Pirkis, ProfPhD
Ulrich S Tran, DSc
Martin Voracek, ProfPhD
Florian Arendt, PhD
Maria Ftanou, PhD
Reka Kovacs, MSc
Kylie King, PhD
Marisa Schlichthorst, PhD
Steven Stack, ProfPhD
Matthew J Spittal, ProfPhD
Effects of media stories of hope and recovery on suicidal ideation and help-seeking attitudes and intentions: systematic review and meta-analysis
The Lancet Public Health
title Effects of media stories of hope and recovery on suicidal ideation and help-seeking attitudes and intentions: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effects of media stories of hope and recovery on suicidal ideation and help-seeking attitudes and intentions: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effects of media stories of hope and recovery on suicidal ideation and help-seeking attitudes and intentions: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of media stories of hope and recovery on suicidal ideation and help-seeking attitudes and intentions: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effects of media stories of hope and recovery on suicidal ideation and help-seeking attitudes and intentions: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effects of media stories of hope and recovery on suicidal ideation and help seeking attitudes and intentions systematic review and meta analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468266721002747
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasniederkrotenthalerphd effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT benedikttilldsc effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stefaniekirchnermph effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marksinyormd effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marliesbraunmphil effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT janepirkisprofphd effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ulrichstrandsc effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT martinvoracekprofphd effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT florianarendtphd effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mariaftanouphd effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rekakovacsmsc effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kyliekingphd effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marisaschlichthorstphd effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stevenstackprofphd effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT matthewjspittalprofphd effectsofmediastoriesofhopeandrecoveryonsuicidalideationandhelpseekingattitudesandintentionssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis