Clinicopathological comparisons of open vein harvesting and endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Mashhad

Introduction: Harvesting of the greater saphenous vein is almost an inevitable part of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations, and it is done by two main techniques, i.e., conventional or open vein harvesting (OVH) and the minimally-invasive endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH). This study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad Amouzeshi, Mohamad Abbassi Teshnisi, Nahid Zirak, Alireza Sepehri Shamloo, Hamid Hoseinikhah, Behzad Alizadeh, Aliasghar Moeinipour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Electronic Physician 2016-01-01
Series:Electronic Physician
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768916/
_version_ 1819136575701778432
author Ahmad Amouzeshi
Mohamad Abbassi Teshnisi
Nahid Zirak
Alireza Sepehri Shamloo
Hamid Hoseinikhah
Behzad Alizadeh
Aliasghar Moeinipour
author_facet Ahmad Amouzeshi
Mohamad Abbassi Teshnisi
Nahid Zirak
Alireza Sepehri Shamloo
Hamid Hoseinikhah
Behzad Alizadeh
Aliasghar Moeinipour
author_sort Ahmad Amouzeshi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Harvesting of the greater saphenous vein is almost an inevitable part of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations, and it is done by two main techniques, i.e., conventional or open vein harvesting (OVH) and the minimally-invasive endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH). This study aimed to compare these two techniques in off-pump CABG procedures with respect to clinical and pathological outcomes. Methods: This cohort study was conducted on CABG candidates during a one-year period from October 2013 through September 2014 in the Department of Cardiac Surgery at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Eighty-seven patients voluntarily underwent EVH, and another 86 patients matched for age, gender, and other cardiovascular risk factors were selected for OVH. They were followed up for six weeks, and the main outcome measures were infections of the wound, pain, duration of hospital stay, and the costs of hospitalization. Paired sample t-test, independent t-test, or their non-parametric equivalents and the chi-squared test were used by SPSS version 17.0 for data analysis. Results: The mean duration of time for vein harvesting was shorter in the EVH group (p < 0.001), and the pain score was lower (p = 0.04). No infections occurred at the site of the wound. The length of hospital stay was not significantly different for the two groups (OVH versus EVH: 8.5 ± 3.3 versus 8.4 ± 3.2 days; p-value: 0.08). Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the EVH group (OVH versus EVH: 5.8 ± 4.7 versus 7.3 ± 2.0 million Tomman; p-value: 0.008), yet no difference was diagnosed with respect to endothelial damage in the vein grafts harvested by the EVH and OVH techniques. Conclusion: EVH is considered as a minimally invasive and safe vein harvesting technique in our Center, and it can reduce the harvesting time and post-operative pain. In addition, its efficiency was similar to that of OVH.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T10:37:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-94cf04507c5f44e69af2899b8cb9c1c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-5842
2008-5842
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T10:37:10Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Electronic Physician
record_format Article
series Electronic Physician
spelling doaj.art-94cf04507c5f44e69af2899b8cb9c1c72022-12-21T18:29:08ZengElectronic PhysicianElectronic Physician2008-58422008-58422016-01-01811693170010.19082/1693Clinicopathological comparisons of open vein harvesting and endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients in MashhadAhmad AmouzeshiMohamad Abbassi TeshnisiNahid ZirakAlireza Sepehri ShamlooHamid HoseinikhahBehzad AlizadehAliasghar MoeinipourIntroduction: Harvesting of the greater saphenous vein is almost an inevitable part of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations, and it is done by two main techniques, i.e., conventional or open vein harvesting (OVH) and the minimally-invasive endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH). This study aimed to compare these two techniques in off-pump CABG procedures with respect to clinical and pathological outcomes. Methods: This cohort study was conducted on CABG candidates during a one-year period from October 2013 through September 2014 in the Department of Cardiac Surgery at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Eighty-seven patients voluntarily underwent EVH, and another 86 patients matched for age, gender, and other cardiovascular risk factors were selected for OVH. They were followed up for six weeks, and the main outcome measures were infections of the wound, pain, duration of hospital stay, and the costs of hospitalization. Paired sample t-test, independent t-test, or their non-parametric equivalents and the chi-squared test were used by SPSS version 17.0 for data analysis. Results: The mean duration of time for vein harvesting was shorter in the EVH group (p < 0.001), and the pain score was lower (p = 0.04). No infections occurred at the site of the wound. The length of hospital stay was not significantly different for the two groups (OVH versus EVH: 8.5 ± 3.3 versus 8.4 ± 3.2 days; p-value: 0.08). Hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the EVH group (OVH versus EVH: 5.8 ± 4.7 versus 7.3 ± 2.0 million Tomman; p-value: 0.008), yet no difference was diagnosed with respect to endothelial damage in the vein grafts harvested by the EVH and OVH techniques. Conclusion: EVH is considered as a minimally invasive and safe vein harvesting technique in our Center, and it can reduce the harvesting time and post-operative pain. In addition, its efficiency was similar to that of OVH.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768916/endoscopic vein harvestingopen vein harvestingcoronary artery bypass graftinggraft patencyclinical outcome
spellingShingle Ahmad Amouzeshi
Mohamad Abbassi Teshnisi
Nahid Zirak
Alireza Sepehri Shamloo
Hamid Hoseinikhah
Behzad Alizadeh
Aliasghar Moeinipour
Clinicopathological comparisons of open vein harvesting and endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Mashhad
Electronic Physician
endoscopic vein harvesting
open vein harvesting
coronary artery bypass grafting
graft patency
clinical outcome
title Clinicopathological comparisons of open vein harvesting and endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Mashhad
title_full Clinicopathological comparisons of open vein harvesting and endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Mashhad
title_fullStr Clinicopathological comparisons of open vein harvesting and endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Mashhad
title_full_unstemmed Clinicopathological comparisons of open vein harvesting and endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Mashhad
title_short Clinicopathological comparisons of open vein harvesting and endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Mashhad
title_sort clinicopathological comparisons of open vein harvesting and endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients in mashhad
topic endoscopic vein harvesting
open vein harvesting
coronary artery bypass grafting
graft patency
clinical outcome
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4768916/
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadamouzeshi clinicopathologicalcomparisonsofopenveinharvestingandendoscopicveinharvestingincoronaryarterybypassgraftingpatientsinmashhad
AT mohamadabbassiteshnisi clinicopathologicalcomparisonsofopenveinharvestingandendoscopicveinharvestingincoronaryarterybypassgraftingpatientsinmashhad
AT nahidzirak clinicopathologicalcomparisonsofopenveinharvestingandendoscopicveinharvestingincoronaryarterybypassgraftingpatientsinmashhad
AT alirezasepehrishamloo clinicopathologicalcomparisonsofopenveinharvestingandendoscopicveinharvestingincoronaryarterybypassgraftingpatientsinmashhad
AT hamidhoseinikhah clinicopathologicalcomparisonsofopenveinharvestingandendoscopicveinharvestingincoronaryarterybypassgraftingpatientsinmashhad
AT behzadalizadeh clinicopathologicalcomparisonsofopenveinharvestingandendoscopicveinharvestingincoronaryarterybypassgraftingpatientsinmashhad
AT aliasgharmoeinipour clinicopathologicalcomparisonsofopenveinharvestingandendoscopicveinharvestingincoronaryarterybypassgraftingpatientsinmashhad