Direct comparison of diagnostic and clinical values between Tc-99 m DPD and Tc-99 m PYP scintigraphy in patients with cardiac amyloidosis

Abstract Background Technetium-99 m 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (DPD) and technetium-99 m sodium pyrophosphate (PYP) are the two most commonly used radiotracers for cardiac amyloidosis (CA), but no studies have directly compared them. Therefore, in this study, we directly compared t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yong-Jin Park, Joohee Lee, Darae Kim, Jin-Oh Choi, Seok Jin Kim, Kihyun Kim, Joon Young Choi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-07-01
Series:BMC Medical Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01054-x
_version_ 1797773897535324160
author Yong-Jin Park
Joohee Lee
Darae Kim
Jin-Oh Choi
Seok Jin Kim
Kihyun Kim
Joon Young Choi
author_facet Yong-Jin Park
Joohee Lee
Darae Kim
Jin-Oh Choi
Seok Jin Kim
Kihyun Kim
Joon Young Choi
author_sort Yong-Jin Park
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Technetium-99 m 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (DPD) and technetium-99 m sodium pyrophosphate (PYP) are the two most commonly used radiotracers for cardiac amyloidosis (CA), but no studies have directly compared them. Therefore, in this study, we directly compared the diagnostic and clinical utility of DPD and PYP scintigraphy in patients with CA. Methods Ten patients with CA were enrolled. Eight clinical variables and 12 scintigraphic parameters were used. Clinical variables were age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and the results of electromyography (EMG), a sensory test, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography (EchoCG). Four heart retention ratios (heart/whole-body profile, heart/pelvis, heart/skull, and heart/contralateral lung) were calculated from the DPD and PYP scans and two visual scoring systems (Perugini and Dorbala systems) were used. Comparative analyses were performed between radiotracers and between visual scoring systems using clinical variables and scintigraphic parameters. Results Twenty DPD parameters and nine PYP parameters had significant associations with age, eGFR, NT-proBNP, EchoCG, and EMG. DPD parameters had more frequent significant associations with clinical variables than PYP parameters. Compared to visual scores in the DPD scan, the proportion of patients with higher visual scores in the PYP scan was relatively greater than those with lower visual scores, and there were more patients with a visual score of 2 or higher in PYP scans than DPD scans. Conclusions DPD scintigraphy may reflect the disease severity of CA better than PYP scintigraphy, whereas PYP scintigraphy may be a more sensitive imaging modality for identifying CA involvement.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T22:12:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-94d998c6981a4204824e3cfa70589f22
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2342
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T22:12:22Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Imaging
spelling doaj.art-94d998c6981a4204824e3cfa70589f222023-07-23T11:29:56ZengBMCBMC Medical Imaging1471-23422023-07-0123111010.1186/s12880-023-01054-xDirect comparison of diagnostic and clinical values between Tc-99 m DPD and Tc-99 m PYP scintigraphy in patients with cardiac amyloidosisYong-Jin Park0Joohee Lee1Darae Kim2Jin-Oh Choi3Seok Jin Kim4Kihyun Kim5Joon Young Choi6Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA UniversityDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineAbstract Background Technetium-99 m 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (DPD) and technetium-99 m sodium pyrophosphate (PYP) are the two most commonly used radiotracers for cardiac amyloidosis (CA), but no studies have directly compared them. Therefore, in this study, we directly compared the diagnostic and clinical utility of DPD and PYP scintigraphy in patients with CA. Methods Ten patients with CA were enrolled. Eight clinical variables and 12 scintigraphic parameters were used. Clinical variables were age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and the results of electromyography (EMG), a sensory test, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography (EchoCG). Four heart retention ratios (heart/whole-body profile, heart/pelvis, heart/skull, and heart/contralateral lung) were calculated from the DPD and PYP scans and two visual scoring systems (Perugini and Dorbala systems) were used. Comparative analyses were performed between radiotracers and between visual scoring systems using clinical variables and scintigraphic parameters. Results Twenty DPD parameters and nine PYP parameters had significant associations with age, eGFR, NT-proBNP, EchoCG, and EMG. DPD parameters had more frequent significant associations with clinical variables than PYP parameters. Compared to visual scores in the DPD scan, the proportion of patients with higher visual scores in the PYP scan was relatively greater than those with lower visual scores, and there were more patients with a visual score of 2 or higher in PYP scans than DPD scans. Conclusions DPD scintigraphy may reflect the disease severity of CA better than PYP scintigraphy, whereas PYP scintigraphy may be a more sensitive imaging modality for identifying CA involvement.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01054-xCardiac amyloidosisTc-99m DPDTc-99m PYPPerugini systemDorbala system
spellingShingle Yong-Jin Park
Joohee Lee
Darae Kim
Jin-Oh Choi
Seok Jin Kim
Kihyun Kim
Joon Young Choi
Direct comparison of diagnostic and clinical values between Tc-99 m DPD and Tc-99 m PYP scintigraphy in patients with cardiac amyloidosis
BMC Medical Imaging
Cardiac amyloidosis
Tc-99m DPD
Tc-99m PYP
Perugini system
Dorbala system
title Direct comparison of diagnostic and clinical values between Tc-99 m DPD and Tc-99 m PYP scintigraphy in patients with cardiac amyloidosis
title_full Direct comparison of diagnostic and clinical values between Tc-99 m DPD and Tc-99 m PYP scintigraphy in patients with cardiac amyloidosis
title_fullStr Direct comparison of diagnostic and clinical values between Tc-99 m DPD and Tc-99 m PYP scintigraphy in patients with cardiac amyloidosis
title_full_unstemmed Direct comparison of diagnostic and clinical values between Tc-99 m DPD and Tc-99 m PYP scintigraphy in patients with cardiac amyloidosis
title_short Direct comparison of diagnostic and clinical values between Tc-99 m DPD and Tc-99 m PYP scintigraphy in patients with cardiac amyloidosis
title_sort direct comparison of diagnostic and clinical values between tc 99 m dpd and tc 99 m pyp scintigraphy in patients with cardiac amyloidosis
topic Cardiac amyloidosis
Tc-99m DPD
Tc-99m PYP
Perugini system
Dorbala system
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01054-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yongjinpark directcomparisonofdiagnosticandclinicalvaluesbetweentc99mdpdandtc99mpypscintigraphyinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosis
AT jooheelee directcomparisonofdiagnosticandclinicalvaluesbetweentc99mdpdandtc99mpypscintigraphyinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosis
AT daraekim directcomparisonofdiagnosticandclinicalvaluesbetweentc99mdpdandtc99mpypscintigraphyinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosis
AT jinohchoi directcomparisonofdiagnosticandclinicalvaluesbetweentc99mdpdandtc99mpypscintigraphyinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosis
AT seokjinkim directcomparisonofdiagnosticandclinicalvaluesbetweentc99mdpdandtc99mpypscintigraphyinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosis
AT kihyunkim directcomparisonofdiagnosticandclinicalvaluesbetweentc99mdpdandtc99mpypscintigraphyinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosis
AT joonyoungchoi directcomparisonofdiagnosticandclinicalvaluesbetweentc99mdpdandtc99mpypscintigraphyinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosis