Minimally invasive valve surgery including patients of combined simultaneous surgery: a retrospective study

Abstract Objective This study investigated the perioperative safety and advantages of performing a minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) and conducting a preliminary examination of the combined simultaneous surgery (CSS). Methods A total of 29 patients (16 men and 13 women; mean age, 58.41 ± 13.08...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yun Ling, Huaxin Chen, Pengxiong Zhu, Tian Li, Bangde Xue, Jun Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-09-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02361-8
_version_ 1797451554652946432
author Yun Ling
Huaxin Chen
Pengxiong Zhu
Tian Li
Bangde Xue
Jun Liu
author_facet Yun Ling
Huaxin Chen
Pengxiong Zhu
Tian Li
Bangde Xue
Jun Liu
author_sort Yun Ling
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective This study investigated the perioperative safety and advantages of performing a minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) and conducting a preliminary examination of the combined simultaneous surgery (CSS). Methods A total of 29 patients (16 men and 13 women; mean age, 58.41 ± 13.08 years) who underwent MIVS at our center from July 2021 to March 2022 were selected. Among them, 16 patients underwent aortic valve surgery (AVS), 13 patients underwent mitral valve surgery (MVS), and four patients additionally underwent CSS. Results The MIVS time ranged from 165 to 420 min, with a mean of 230.54 ± 54.61 min; the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time ranged from 54 to 164 min, with a mean of 120.24 ± 25.98 min; the aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time ranged from 36 to 118 min, with a mean of 78.66 ± 21.01 min and an automatic heart resuscitating rate was 89.66%; the mean tracheal intubation time was 6.30 ± 3.87 h, and the median total postoperative drainage was 317.5 (35, 1470) ml. No difference was observed between preoperative and postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (61.90% ± 6.28% vs. 60.21% ± 5.52%, P = 0.281). The difference in postoperative drainage (419.20 ml ± 377.20 ml vs. 588.75 ml ± 673.63 ml, P = .461), tracheal intubation time (6.66 h ± 4.27 h vs. 4.63 h ± 1.11 h, P = .359), intensive care unit (ICU) stay (3.96 ± 8.62 days vs. 2.00 ± 0.816 days, P = .658), and postoperative hospital stay (9.96 ± 8.45 days vs. 8.25 ± 1.26 days, P = .694) between MIVS and CSS was not significant. Conclusion MIVS in our center may be safe and effective. Additionally, CSS may be a feasible option that could be performed after a thorough preoperative evaluation and multidisciplinary discussion.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:55:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-94eb47600b1643a689d8459e66bd014e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-8090
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:55:25Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-94eb47600b1643a689d8459e66bd014e2023-11-26T14:12:19ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902023-09-011811710.1186/s13019-023-02361-8Minimally invasive valve surgery including patients of combined simultaneous surgery: a retrospective studyYun Ling0Huaxin Chen1Pengxiong Zhu2Tian Li3Bangde Xue4Jun Liu5Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital affiliated to Tongji University School of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General HospitalDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital affiliated to Tongji University School of MedicineSchool of Basic Medicine, Fourth Military Medical UniversityDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital affiliated to Tongji University School of MedicineDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital affiliated to Tongji University School of MedicineAbstract Objective This study investigated the perioperative safety and advantages of performing a minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) and conducting a preliminary examination of the combined simultaneous surgery (CSS). Methods A total of 29 patients (16 men and 13 women; mean age, 58.41 ± 13.08 years) who underwent MIVS at our center from July 2021 to March 2022 were selected. Among them, 16 patients underwent aortic valve surgery (AVS), 13 patients underwent mitral valve surgery (MVS), and four patients additionally underwent CSS. Results The MIVS time ranged from 165 to 420 min, with a mean of 230.54 ± 54.61 min; the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time ranged from 54 to 164 min, with a mean of 120.24 ± 25.98 min; the aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time ranged from 36 to 118 min, with a mean of 78.66 ± 21.01 min and an automatic heart resuscitating rate was 89.66%; the mean tracheal intubation time was 6.30 ± 3.87 h, and the median total postoperative drainage was 317.5 (35, 1470) ml. No difference was observed between preoperative and postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (61.90% ± 6.28% vs. 60.21% ± 5.52%, P = 0.281). The difference in postoperative drainage (419.20 ml ± 377.20 ml vs. 588.75 ml ± 673.63 ml, P = .461), tracheal intubation time (6.66 h ± 4.27 h vs. 4.63 h ± 1.11 h, P = .359), intensive care unit (ICU) stay (3.96 ± 8.62 days vs. 2.00 ± 0.816 days, P = .658), and postoperative hospital stay (9.96 ± 8.45 days vs. 8.25 ± 1.26 days, P = .694) between MIVS and CSS was not significant. Conclusion MIVS in our center may be safe and effective. Additionally, CSS may be a feasible option that could be performed after a thorough preoperative evaluation and multidisciplinary discussion.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02361-8Heart valve diseasesMinimally invasive surgical proceduresCardiac surgical procedures
spellingShingle Yun Ling
Huaxin Chen
Pengxiong Zhu
Tian Li
Bangde Xue
Jun Liu
Minimally invasive valve surgery including patients of combined simultaneous surgery: a retrospective study
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Heart valve diseases
Minimally invasive surgical procedures
Cardiac surgical procedures
title Minimally invasive valve surgery including patients of combined simultaneous surgery: a retrospective study
title_full Minimally invasive valve surgery including patients of combined simultaneous surgery: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Minimally invasive valve surgery including patients of combined simultaneous surgery: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive valve surgery including patients of combined simultaneous surgery: a retrospective study
title_short Minimally invasive valve surgery including patients of combined simultaneous surgery: a retrospective study
title_sort minimally invasive valve surgery including patients of combined simultaneous surgery a retrospective study
topic Heart valve diseases
Minimally invasive surgical procedures
Cardiac surgical procedures
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02361-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yunling minimallyinvasivevalvesurgeryincludingpatientsofcombinedsimultaneoussurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT huaxinchen minimallyinvasivevalvesurgeryincludingpatientsofcombinedsimultaneoussurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT pengxiongzhu minimallyinvasivevalvesurgeryincludingpatientsofcombinedsimultaneoussurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT tianli minimallyinvasivevalvesurgeryincludingpatientsofcombinedsimultaneoussurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT bangdexue minimallyinvasivevalvesurgeryincludingpatientsofcombinedsimultaneoussurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT junliu minimallyinvasivevalvesurgeryincludingpatientsofcombinedsimultaneoussurgeryaretrospectivestudy