Save the meniscus – Clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus meniscal repair

Purpose: This study was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus repair and to study the effects of (1) duration of follow-up and (2) concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, involving 112...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen Qiang Lee, Jonathan Zhi-Wei Gan, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-05-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019849813
_version_ 1811333896041660416
author Wen Qiang Lee
Jonathan Zhi-Wei Gan
Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie
author_facet Wen Qiang Lee
Jonathan Zhi-Wei Gan
Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie
author_sort Wen Qiang Lee
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: This study was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus repair and to study the effects of (1) duration of follow-up and (2) concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, involving 112 knees of 106 patients who underwent meniscus surgery, either partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair between 2008 and 2016. There were 42 meniscectomies and 70 meniscal repairs. Patients were graded pre- and post-operatively using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Tegner Activity Level Scale through case notes review. Statistical analysis was done using the paired Student’s t -test (two-tailed) or Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired scores. The two-sample Student’s t -test (two-tailed) or Mann–Whitney U test was used for independent scores. Multiple variable linear regression analysis was used to assess the importance of the variables on outcomes. A statistical significance is taken as p < 0.05. Results: Meniscectomy and repair had good outcomes. IKDC scores improved from 46.6 to 81.7 after meniscectomy and from 45.9 to 84.4 after repair ( p < 0.001). Meniscectomy fared worse in late follow-up (>18 months), decreasing from 88.2 in early follow-up (≤18 months) to 72.1 ( p < 0.05). The post-operative scores in meniscal repair were maintained in the late follow-up group (82.9 compared to 87.1, p > 0.05). Concomitant ACL reconstruction improved the outcomes of meniscectomy (IKDC and Tegner: p < 0.05) and repair (IKDC and Tegner: p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both meniscectomy and meniscal repair are viable surgical techniques for meniscal injury and have good outcomes. Meniscal repair has a better prognosis in the long run.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:59:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-94ec31c23bb74f31b44230c11c99fe12
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2309-4990
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:59:42Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-94ec31c23bb74f31b44230c11c99fe122022-12-22T02:38:42ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902019-05-012710.1177/2309499019849813Save the meniscus – Clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus meniscal repairWen Qiang LeeJonathan Zhi-Wei GanDenny Tjiauw Tjoen LiePurpose: This study was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus repair and to study the effects of (1) duration of follow-up and (2) concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, involving 112 knees of 106 patients who underwent meniscus surgery, either partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair between 2008 and 2016. There were 42 meniscectomies and 70 meniscal repairs. Patients were graded pre- and post-operatively using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Tegner Activity Level Scale through case notes review. Statistical analysis was done using the paired Student’s t -test (two-tailed) or Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired scores. The two-sample Student’s t -test (two-tailed) or Mann–Whitney U test was used for independent scores. Multiple variable linear regression analysis was used to assess the importance of the variables on outcomes. A statistical significance is taken as p < 0.05. Results: Meniscectomy and repair had good outcomes. IKDC scores improved from 46.6 to 81.7 after meniscectomy and from 45.9 to 84.4 after repair ( p < 0.001). Meniscectomy fared worse in late follow-up (>18 months), decreasing from 88.2 in early follow-up (≤18 months) to 72.1 ( p < 0.05). The post-operative scores in meniscal repair were maintained in the late follow-up group (82.9 compared to 87.1, p > 0.05). Concomitant ACL reconstruction improved the outcomes of meniscectomy (IKDC and Tegner: p < 0.05) and repair (IKDC and Tegner: p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both meniscectomy and meniscal repair are viable surgical techniques for meniscal injury and have good outcomes. Meniscal repair has a better prognosis in the long run.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019849813
spellingShingle Wen Qiang Lee
Jonathan Zhi-Wei Gan
Denny Tjiauw Tjoen Lie
Save the meniscus – Clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus meniscal repair
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
title Save the meniscus – Clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus meniscal repair
title_full Save the meniscus – Clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus meniscal repair
title_fullStr Save the meniscus – Clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus meniscal repair
title_full_unstemmed Save the meniscus – Clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus meniscal repair
title_short Save the meniscus – Clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus meniscal repair
title_sort save the meniscus clinical outcomes of meniscectomy versus meniscal repair
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019849813
work_keys_str_mv AT wenqianglee savethemeniscusclinicaloutcomesofmeniscectomyversusmeniscalrepair
AT jonathanzhiweigan savethemeniscusclinicaloutcomesofmeniscectomyversusmeniscalrepair
AT dennytjiauwtjoenlie savethemeniscusclinicaloutcomesofmeniscectomyversusmeniscalrepair