Web-Based Independent Versus Laboratory-Based Stop-Signal Task Performance: Within-Subjects Counterbalanced Comparison Study

BackgroundConsidered a facet of behavioral impulsivity, response inhibition facilitates adaptive and goal-directed behavior. It is often assessed using the Stop-Signal Task (SST), which is presented on stand-alone computers under controlled laboratory conditions. Sample size...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antoinette Poulton, Li Peng Evelyn Chen, Gezelle Dali, Michael Fox, Robert Hester
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2022-05-01
Series:Journal of Medical Internet Research
Online Access:https://www.jmir.org/2022/5/e32922
_version_ 1797735065981026304
author Antoinette Poulton
Li Peng Evelyn Chen
Gezelle Dali
Michael Fox
Robert Hester
author_facet Antoinette Poulton
Li Peng Evelyn Chen
Gezelle Dali
Michael Fox
Robert Hester
author_sort Antoinette Poulton
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundConsidered a facet of behavioral impulsivity, response inhibition facilitates adaptive and goal-directed behavior. It is often assessed using the Stop-Signal Task (SST), which is presented on stand-alone computers under controlled laboratory conditions. Sample size may consequently be a function of cost or time and sample diversity constrained to those willing or able to attend the laboratory. Statistical power and generalizability of results might, in turn, be impacted. Such limitations may potentially be overcome via the implementation of web-based testing. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate if there were differences between variables derived from a web-based SST when it was undertaken independently—that is, outside the laboratory, on any computer, and in the absence of researchers—versus when it was performed under laboratory conditions. MethodsWe programmed a web-based SST in HTML and JavaScript and employed a counterbalanced design. A total of 166 individuals (mean age 19.72, SD 1.85, range 18-36 years; 146/166, 88% female) were recruited. Of them, 79 undertook the independent task prior to visiting the laboratory and 78 completed the independent task following their laboratory visit. The average time between SST testing was 3.72 (SD 2.86) days. Dependent samples and Bayesian paired samples t tests were used to examine differences between laboratory-based and independent SST variables. Correlational analyses were conducted on stop-signal reaction times (SSRT). ResultsAfter exclusions, 123 participants (mean age 19.73, SD 1.97 years) completed the SST both in the laboratory and independently. While participants were less accurate on go trials and exhibited reduced inhibitory control when undertaking the independent—compared to the laboratory-based—SST, there was a positive association between the SSRT of each condition (r=.48; P<.001; 95% CI 0.33-0.61). ConclusionsFindings suggest a web-based SST, which participants undertake on any computer, at any location, and in the absence of the researcher, is a suitable measure of response inhibition.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:52:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-94ecac14ed284abcb73f8dc102ef77c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1438-8871
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:52:41Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Internet Research
spelling doaj.art-94ecac14ed284abcb73f8dc102ef77c02023-08-28T21:52:15ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712022-05-01245e3292210.2196/32922Web-Based Independent Versus Laboratory-Based Stop-Signal Task Performance: Within-Subjects Counterbalanced Comparison StudyAntoinette Poultonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9291-6128Li Peng Evelyn Chenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-494XGezelle Dalihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1613-2596Michael Foxhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5636-0839Robert Hesterhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-8026 BackgroundConsidered a facet of behavioral impulsivity, response inhibition facilitates adaptive and goal-directed behavior. It is often assessed using the Stop-Signal Task (SST), which is presented on stand-alone computers under controlled laboratory conditions. Sample size may consequently be a function of cost or time and sample diversity constrained to those willing or able to attend the laboratory. Statistical power and generalizability of results might, in turn, be impacted. Such limitations may potentially be overcome via the implementation of web-based testing. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate if there were differences between variables derived from a web-based SST when it was undertaken independently—that is, outside the laboratory, on any computer, and in the absence of researchers—versus when it was performed under laboratory conditions. MethodsWe programmed a web-based SST in HTML and JavaScript and employed a counterbalanced design. A total of 166 individuals (mean age 19.72, SD 1.85, range 18-36 years; 146/166, 88% female) were recruited. Of them, 79 undertook the independent task prior to visiting the laboratory and 78 completed the independent task following their laboratory visit. The average time between SST testing was 3.72 (SD 2.86) days. Dependent samples and Bayesian paired samples t tests were used to examine differences between laboratory-based and independent SST variables. Correlational analyses were conducted on stop-signal reaction times (SSRT). ResultsAfter exclusions, 123 participants (mean age 19.73, SD 1.97 years) completed the SST both in the laboratory and independently. While participants were less accurate on go trials and exhibited reduced inhibitory control when undertaking the independent—compared to the laboratory-based—SST, there was a positive association between the SSRT of each condition (r=.48; P<.001; 95% CI 0.33-0.61). ConclusionsFindings suggest a web-based SST, which participants undertake on any computer, at any location, and in the absence of the researcher, is a suitable measure of response inhibition.https://www.jmir.org/2022/5/e32922
spellingShingle Antoinette Poulton
Li Peng Evelyn Chen
Gezelle Dali
Michael Fox
Robert Hester
Web-Based Independent Versus Laboratory-Based Stop-Signal Task Performance: Within-Subjects Counterbalanced Comparison Study
Journal of Medical Internet Research
title Web-Based Independent Versus Laboratory-Based Stop-Signal Task Performance: Within-Subjects Counterbalanced Comparison Study
title_full Web-Based Independent Versus Laboratory-Based Stop-Signal Task Performance: Within-Subjects Counterbalanced Comparison Study
title_fullStr Web-Based Independent Versus Laboratory-Based Stop-Signal Task Performance: Within-Subjects Counterbalanced Comparison Study
title_full_unstemmed Web-Based Independent Versus Laboratory-Based Stop-Signal Task Performance: Within-Subjects Counterbalanced Comparison Study
title_short Web-Based Independent Versus Laboratory-Based Stop-Signal Task Performance: Within-Subjects Counterbalanced Comparison Study
title_sort web based independent versus laboratory based stop signal task performance within subjects counterbalanced comparison study
url https://www.jmir.org/2022/5/e32922
work_keys_str_mv AT antoinettepoulton webbasedindependentversuslaboratorybasedstopsignaltaskperformancewithinsubjectscounterbalancedcomparisonstudy
AT lipengevelynchen webbasedindependentversuslaboratorybasedstopsignaltaskperformancewithinsubjectscounterbalancedcomparisonstudy
AT gezelledali webbasedindependentversuslaboratorybasedstopsignaltaskperformancewithinsubjectscounterbalancedcomparisonstudy
AT michaelfox webbasedindependentversuslaboratorybasedstopsignaltaskperformancewithinsubjectscounterbalancedcomparisonstudy
AT roberthester webbasedindependentversuslaboratorybasedstopsignaltaskperformancewithinsubjectscounterbalancedcomparisonstudy