Charity and the Reiteration Problem for Enthymemes

Any enthymeme can be made logically valid by adding as a suppressed premise a conditional that reiterates the argument's stated content and inferential structure in if-then form, We cannot blanketly prohibit reiteration to avoid this sort of trivialization, because some enthymemes legitimately...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dale Jacquette
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 1996-01-01
Series:Informal Logic
Subjects:
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2364
_version_ 1818043287888461824
author Dale Jacquette
author_facet Dale Jacquette
author_sort Dale Jacquette
collection DOAJ
description Any enthymeme can be made logically valid by adding as a suppressed premise a conditional that reiterates the argument's stated content and inferential structure in if-then form, We cannot blanketly prohibit reiteration to avoid this sort of trivialization, because some enthymemes legitimately require completion by reiterative conditionals, The solution proposed here is to allow reiterative expansions, but to rank them, other things being equal, as less charitable than nonreiterative expansions. Reiterative expansions can then be chosen as the most charitable only when all nonreiterative expansions have been eliminated for independent reasons. This pluralistic model encourages experimentation with a number of different permissible expansions in evaluating enthymemes, from the least controversial or problematic to the most trivializing and the least charitable.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T08:59:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-94f7b39980454bfda20623c851821b6b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T08:59:49Z
publishDate 1996-01-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series Informal Logic
spelling doaj.art-94f7b39980454bfda20623c851821b6b2022-12-22T01:55:19ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X1996-01-0118110.22329/il.v18i1.2364Charity and the Reiteration Problem for EnthymemesDale JacquetteAny enthymeme can be made logically valid by adding as a suppressed premise a conditional that reiterates the argument's stated content and inferential structure in if-then form, We cannot blanketly prohibit reiteration to avoid this sort of trivialization, because some enthymemes legitimately require completion by reiterative conditionals, The solution proposed here is to allow reiterative expansions, but to rank them, other things being equal, as less charitable than nonreiterative expansions. Reiterative expansions can then be chosen as the most charitable only when all nonreiterative expansions have been eliminated for independent reasons. This pluralistic model encourages experimentation with a number of different permissible expansions in evaluating enthymemes, from the least controversial or problematic to the most trivializing and the least charitable.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2364charityprinciple of charitycharity rankingsenthymemesound argument(conditional)reiteration
spellingShingle Dale Jacquette
Charity and the Reiteration Problem for Enthymemes
Informal Logic
charity
principle of charity
charity rankings
enthymeme
sound argument
(conditional)reiteration
title Charity and the Reiteration Problem for Enthymemes
title_full Charity and the Reiteration Problem for Enthymemes
title_fullStr Charity and the Reiteration Problem for Enthymemes
title_full_unstemmed Charity and the Reiteration Problem for Enthymemes
title_short Charity and the Reiteration Problem for Enthymemes
title_sort charity and the reiteration problem for enthymemes
topic charity
principle of charity
charity rankings
enthymeme
sound argument
(conditional)reiteration
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2364
work_keys_str_mv AT dalejacquette charityandthereiterationproblemforenthymemes