Aḥmad Amīn’s Rationalist Approach to the <i>Qur’ān</i> and <i>Sunnah</i>
The emergence of Islamic reformist thinking in the period of the so-called Nahḍah (Renaissance), in particular in the latter part of the XIX century, entailed a revival of interest in Muʿtazilite rationalism. Among the Sunni intellectuals who reevaluated the ancient theological school, a prominent p...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-03-01
|
| Series: | Religions |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/3/234 |
| _version_ | 1797442890543136768 |
|---|---|
| author | Ines Peta |
| author_facet | Ines Peta |
| author_sort | Ines Peta |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The emergence of Islamic reformist thinking in the period of the so-called Nahḍah (Renaissance), in particular in the latter part of the XIX century, entailed a revival of interest in Muʿtazilite rationalism. Among the Sunni intellectuals who reevaluated the ancient theological school, a prominent place belongs to Aḥmad Amīn (1886–1954). Muʿtazilism takes up much space in his famous trilogy <i>Fajr al-Islām</i> (<i>The Dawn of Islam</i>), <i>Ḍ</i><i>u</i><i>ḥ</i><i>ā al-Islām</i> (<i>The Morning of Islam</i>) and <i>Ẓ</i><i>uhr al-Islām</i> (<i>The Noon of Islam</i>). Although the trilogy has been defined as the first critical research work carried out by a Muslim writer on Islamic civilisation, it has not been the subject of any specific or in-depth studies. The present article aims to partially fill this gap through a detailed linguistic and content analysis of selected passages from the trilogy. This analysis shows how Aḥmad Amīn’s interpretation of the Muʿtazilism fits into the wider project that he pursued to reform Islam: on the one hand, he fought against the traditional dependence on transmitted data (<i>naql</i>), which he considered to be the main cause of the intellectual stasis of the Muslims; on the other hand, he promoted a critical reading of the sacred texts, the <i>Qur’ān</i> and <i>Sunnah</i>, based on reason and on modern Western scientific methodology. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T12:48:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-94fe055c20824dc28c231bc0ee20847f |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2077-1444 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T12:48:08Z |
| publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Religions |
| spelling | doaj.art-94fe055c20824dc28c231bc0ee20847f2023-11-30T22:10:11ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442022-03-0113323410.3390/rel13030234Aḥmad Amīn’s Rationalist Approach to the <i>Qur’ān</i> and <i>Sunnah</i>Ines Peta0Department of Modern Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, University of Bologna, 40124 Bologna, ItalyThe emergence of Islamic reformist thinking in the period of the so-called Nahḍah (Renaissance), in particular in the latter part of the XIX century, entailed a revival of interest in Muʿtazilite rationalism. Among the Sunni intellectuals who reevaluated the ancient theological school, a prominent place belongs to Aḥmad Amīn (1886–1954). Muʿtazilism takes up much space in his famous trilogy <i>Fajr al-Islām</i> (<i>The Dawn of Islam</i>), <i>Ḍ</i><i>u</i><i>ḥ</i><i>ā al-Islām</i> (<i>The Morning of Islam</i>) and <i>Ẓ</i><i>uhr al-Islām</i> (<i>The Noon of Islam</i>). Although the trilogy has been defined as the first critical research work carried out by a Muslim writer on Islamic civilisation, it has not been the subject of any specific or in-depth studies. The present article aims to partially fill this gap through a detailed linguistic and content analysis of selected passages from the trilogy. This analysis shows how Aḥmad Amīn’s interpretation of the Muʿtazilism fits into the wider project that he pursued to reform Islam: on the one hand, he fought against the traditional dependence on transmitted data (<i>naql</i>), which he considered to be the main cause of the intellectual stasis of the Muslims; on the other hand, he promoted a critical reading of the sacred texts, the <i>Qur’ān</i> and <i>Sunnah</i>, based on reason and on modern Western scientific methodology.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/3/234Aḥmad AmīnMuʿtazilismNeo-MuʿtazilismIslamic ReformismQurʾānic exegesis<i>ḥadīth</i> criticism |
| spellingShingle | Ines Peta Aḥmad Amīn’s Rationalist Approach to the <i>Qur’ān</i> and <i>Sunnah</i> Religions Aḥmad Amīn Muʿtazilism Neo-Muʿtazilism Islamic Reformism Qurʾānic exegesis <i>ḥadīth</i> criticism |
| title | Aḥmad Amīn’s Rationalist Approach to the <i>Qur’ān</i> and <i>Sunnah</i> |
| title_full | Aḥmad Amīn’s Rationalist Approach to the <i>Qur’ān</i> and <i>Sunnah</i> |
| title_fullStr | Aḥmad Amīn’s Rationalist Approach to the <i>Qur’ān</i> and <i>Sunnah</i> |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aḥmad Amīn’s Rationalist Approach to the <i>Qur’ān</i> and <i>Sunnah</i> |
| title_short | Aḥmad Amīn’s Rationalist Approach to the <i>Qur’ān</i> and <i>Sunnah</i> |
| title_sort | ahmad amin s rationalist approach to the i qur an i and i sunnah i |
| topic | Aḥmad Amīn Muʿtazilism Neo-Muʿtazilism Islamic Reformism Qurʾānic exegesis <i>ḥadīth</i> criticism |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/3/234 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT inespeta ahmadaminsrationalistapproachtotheiquraniandisunnahi |