Peer review and publication delay

Selecting peer reviewers is a crucial stage of the editorial process that ensures the quality of scholarly publications. An alternative to selecting peer reviewers from data bases created with expressions of interest of volunteers consists in systematically searching PubMed for similar articles and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernandez-Llimos F, Fernandez-Llimos F, Pharmacy Practice 2018 peer reviewers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2019-03-01
Series:Pharmacy Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/1502
_version_ 1830357233263706112
author Fernandez-Llimos F
Fernandez-Llimos F, Pharmacy Practice 2018 peer reviewers
author_facet Fernandez-Llimos F
Fernandez-Llimos F, Pharmacy Practice 2018 peer reviewers
author_sort Fernandez-Llimos F
collection DOAJ
description Selecting peer reviewers is a crucial stage of the editorial process that ensures the quality of scholarly publications. An alternative to selecting peer reviewers from data bases created with expressions of interest of volunteers consists in systematically searching PubMed for similar articles and inviting their authors to act as peer reviewers. Although this process might identify more appropriate peers, it also can increase the time of the editorial process. In 2018, Pharmacy Practice had to invite 4.70 (SE=0.33) potential reviewers per one accepting. The time from the first reviewer invitation to the last reviewer report received was 61 days (SE=2.1). These figures confirm the existence of a peer review crisis which is significantly increasing the publication delay.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T02:20:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-95149f41376148088f04d6ee1ab4c1a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1885-642X
1886-3655
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T02:20:05Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format Article
series Pharmacy Practice
spelling doaj.art-95149f41376148088f04d6ee1ab4c1a22022-12-21T19:56:51ZengCentro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones FarmaceuticasPharmacy Practice1885-642X1886-36552019-03-01171150210.18549/PharmPract.2019.1.1502Peer review and publication delayFernandez-Llimos FFernandez-Llimos F, Pharmacy Practice 2018 peer reviewersSelecting peer reviewers is a crucial stage of the editorial process that ensures the quality of scholarly publications. An alternative to selecting peer reviewers from data bases created with expressions of interest of volunteers consists in systematically searching PubMed for similar articles and inviting their authors to act as peer reviewers. Although this process might identify more appropriate peers, it also can increase the time of the editorial process. In 2018, Pharmacy Practice had to invite 4.70 (SE=0.33) potential reviewers per one accepting. The time from the first reviewer invitation to the last reviewer report received was 61 days (SE=2.1). These figures confirm the existence of a peer review crisis which is significantly increasing the publication delay.https://www.pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/1502Peer ReviewPeer Review ResearchOpen Access PublishingPeriodicals as Topic
spellingShingle Fernandez-Llimos F
Fernandez-Llimos F, Pharmacy Practice 2018 peer reviewers
Peer review and publication delay
Pharmacy Practice
Peer Review
Peer Review Research
Open Access Publishing
Periodicals as Topic
title Peer review and publication delay
title_full Peer review and publication delay
title_fullStr Peer review and publication delay
title_full_unstemmed Peer review and publication delay
title_short Peer review and publication delay
title_sort peer review and publication delay
topic Peer Review
Peer Review Research
Open Access Publishing
Periodicals as Topic
url https://www.pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/1502
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezllimosf peerreviewandpublicationdelay
AT fernandezllimosfpharmacypractice2018peerreviewers peerreviewandpublicationdelay