Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing as an Enabler for Light Weight Flight Hardware

Three case studies utilizing topology optimization and Additive Manufacturing for the development of space flight hardware are described. The Additive Manufacturing (AM) modality that was used in this work is powder bed laser based fusion. The case studies correspond to the redesign and manufacture...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa Orme, Ivan Madera, Michael Gschweitl, Michael Ferrari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-11-01
Series:Designs
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2411-9660/2/4/51
_version_ 1819160609839644672
author Melissa Orme
Ivan Madera
Michael Gschweitl
Michael Ferrari
author_facet Melissa Orme
Ivan Madera
Michael Gschweitl
Michael Ferrari
author_sort Melissa Orme
collection DOAJ
description Three case studies utilizing topology optimization and Additive Manufacturing for the development of space flight hardware are described. The Additive Manufacturing (AM) modality that was used in this work is powder bed laser based fusion. The case studies correspond to the redesign and manufacture of two heritage parts for a Surrey Satellite Technology LTD (SSTL) Technology Demonstrator Space Mission that are currently functioning in orbit (case studies 1 and 2), and a system of five components for the SpaceIL’s lunar launch vehicle planned for launch in the near future (case study 3). In each case, the nominal or heritage part has undergone topology optimization, incorporating the AM manufacturing constraints that include: minimization of support structures, ability to remove unsintered powder, and minimization of heat transfer jumps that will cause artifact warpage. To this end the topology optimization exercise must be coupled to the Additive Manufacturing build direction, and steps are incorporated to integrate the AM constraints. After design verification by successfully passing a Finite Element Analysis routine, the components have been fabricated and the AM artifacts and in-process testing coupons have undergone verification and qualification testing in order to deliver structural components that are suitable for their respective missions.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T16:59:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9515cad3f3d048b5aabea0d1053fdc41
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2411-9660
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T16:59:11Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Designs
spelling doaj.art-9515cad3f3d048b5aabea0d1053fdc412022-12-21T18:19:22ZengMDPI AGDesigns2411-96602018-11-01245110.3390/designs2040051designs2040051Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing as an Enabler for Light Weight Flight HardwareMelissa Orme0Ivan Madera1Michael Gschweitl2Michael Ferrari3Morf3D Inc., El Segundo, CA 90245, USAMorf3D Inc., El Segundo, CA 90245, USARuag Space, 8052 Zürich, SwitzerlandRuag Space, 8052 Zürich, SwitzerlandThree case studies utilizing topology optimization and Additive Manufacturing for the development of space flight hardware are described. The Additive Manufacturing (AM) modality that was used in this work is powder bed laser based fusion. The case studies correspond to the redesign and manufacture of two heritage parts for a Surrey Satellite Technology LTD (SSTL) Technology Demonstrator Space Mission that are currently functioning in orbit (case studies 1 and 2), and a system of five components for the SpaceIL’s lunar launch vehicle planned for launch in the near future (case study 3). In each case, the nominal or heritage part has undergone topology optimization, incorporating the AM manufacturing constraints that include: minimization of support structures, ability to remove unsintered powder, and minimization of heat transfer jumps that will cause artifact warpage. To this end the topology optimization exercise must be coupled to the Additive Manufacturing build direction, and steps are incorporated to integrate the AM constraints. After design verification by successfully passing a Finite Element Analysis routine, the components have been fabricated and the AM artifacts and in-process testing coupons have undergone verification and qualification testing in order to deliver structural components that are suitable for their respective missions.https://www.mdpi.com/2411-9660/2/4/51additive manufacturingtopology optimizationdesign for additive manufacturing3D printingaerospacefull-life cycle manufacturing flow
spellingShingle Melissa Orme
Ivan Madera
Michael Gschweitl
Michael Ferrari
Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing as an Enabler for Light Weight Flight Hardware
Designs
additive manufacturing
topology optimization
design for additive manufacturing
3D printing
aerospace
full-life cycle manufacturing flow
title Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing as an Enabler for Light Weight Flight Hardware
title_full Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing as an Enabler for Light Weight Flight Hardware
title_fullStr Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing as an Enabler for Light Weight Flight Hardware
title_full_unstemmed Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing as an Enabler for Light Weight Flight Hardware
title_short Topology Optimization for Additive Manufacturing as an Enabler for Light Weight Flight Hardware
title_sort topology optimization for additive manufacturing as an enabler for light weight flight hardware
topic additive manufacturing
topology optimization
design for additive manufacturing
3D printing
aerospace
full-life cycle manufacturing flow
url https://www.mdpi.com/2411-9660/2/4/51
work_keys_str_mv AT melissaorme topologyoptimizationforadditivemanufacturingasanenablerforlightweightflighthardware
AT ivanmadera topologyoptimizationforadditivemanufacturingasanenablerforlightweightflighthardware
AT michaelgschweitl topologyoptimizationforadditivemanufacturingasanenablerforlightweightflighthardware
AT michaelferrari topologyoptimizationforadditivemanufacturingasanenablerforlightweightflighthardware