Integration of SETS (Social–Ecological–Technological Systems) Framework and Flood Resilience Cycle for Smart Flood Risk Management

The concept of “water smart city” is increasingly being recognized as a new approach to managing urban environments (including urban floods), especially in the context of developing countries, such as Indonesia. While Indonesia’s national capital relocation plan is expected to attract significant hu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ariyaningsih, Rajib Shaw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Smart Cities
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2624-6511/5/4/67
_version_ 1797455253323382784
author Ariyaningsih
Rajib Shaw
author_facet Ariyaningsih
Rajib Shaw
author_sort Ariyaningsih
collection DOAJ
description The concept of “water smart city” is increasingly being recognized as a new approach to managing urban environments (including urban floods), especially in the context of developing countries, such as Indonesia. While Indonesia’s national capital relocation plan is expected to attract significant human migration to two nearby cities, Samarinda City and the port city of Balikpapan, these cities have continuously faced with severe risk of flooding. Therefore, this research proposes a flood management approach by reviewing the local city government’s flood risk management strategies and the smart city plan to enhance flood resilience. The integration of the SETS (Social–Ecological–Technological systems) framework and the Flood Resilience Cycle is undertaken to determine the state of flood management, which is followed by a review of smart city plans and programs in two selected cities (Samarinda and Balikpapan). The research mainly identifies how it can be implemented in the two selected cities based on SETS–FRC distribution. In accordance with the SETS–FRC (Flood Resilience Cycle) framework, it is revealed that both these cities have a higher emphasis on the flood prevention phase, as compared to other resilience phases. Based on the overall results, this study emphasizes the implementation of a water smart city concept for effective and smart flood risk management.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:51:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-951bf89344424e17b0495b93b9124bd5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2624-6511
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:51:45Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Smart Cities
spelling doaj.art-951bf89344424e17b0495b93b9124bd52023-11-24T18:00:53ZengMDPI AGSmart Cities2624-65112022-09-01541312133510.3390/smartcities5040067Integration of SETS (Social–Ecological–Technological Systems) Framework and Flood Resilience Cycle for Smart Flood Risk ManagementAriyaningsih0Rajib Shaw1Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa-shi 252-0882, JapanGraduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa-shi 252-0882, JapanThe concept of “water smart city” is increasingly being recognized as a new approach to managing urban environments (including urban floods), especially in the context of developing countries, such as Indonesia. While Indonesia’s national capital relocation plan is expected to attract significant human migration to two nearby cities, Samarinda City and the port city of Balikpapan, these cities have continuously faced with severe risk of flooding. Therefore, this research proposes a flood management approach by reviewing the local city government’s flood risk management strategies and the smart city plan to enhance flood resilience. The integration of the SETS (Social–Ecological–Technological systems) framework and the Flood Resilience Cycle is undertaken to determine the state of flood management, which is followed by a review of smart city plans and programs in two selected cities (Samarinda and Balikpapan). The research mainly identifies how it can be implemented in the two selected cities based on SETS–FRC distribution. In accordance with the SETS–FRC (Flood Resilience Cycle) framework, it is revealed that both these cities have a higher emphasis on the flood prevention phase, as compared to other resilience phases. Based on the overall results, this study emphasizes the implementation of a water smart city concept for effective and smart flood risk management.https://www.mdpi.com/2624-6511/5/4/67flood riskSETS frameworkflood resilience cyclewater smart city
spellingShingle Ariyaningsih
Rajib Shaw
Integration of SETS (Social–Ecological–Technological Systems) Framework and Flood Resilience Cycle for Smart Flood Risk Management
Smart Cities
flood risk
SETS framework
flood resilience cycle
water smart city
title Integration of SETS (Social–Ecological–Technological Systems) Framework and Flood Resilience Cycle for Smart Flood Risk Management
title_full Integration of SETS (Social–Ecological–Technological Systems) Framework and Flood Resilience Cycle for Smart Flood Risk Management
title_fullStr Integration of SETS (Social–Ecological–Technological Systems) Framework and Flood Resilience Cycle for Smart Flood Risk Management
title_full_unstemmed Integration of SETS (Social–Ecological–Technological Systems) Framework and Flood Resilience Cycle for Smart Flood Risk Management
title_short Integration of SETS (Social–Ecological–Technological Systems) Framework and Flood Resilience Cycle for Smart Flood Risk Management
title_sort integration of sets social ecological technological systems framework and flood resilience cycle for smart flood risk management
topic flood risk
SETS framework
flood resilience cycle
water smart city
url https://www.mdpi.com/2624-6511/5/4/67
work_keys_str_mv AT ariyaningsih integrationofsetssocialecologicaltechnologicalsystemsframeworkandfloodresiliencecycleforsmartfloodriskmanagement
AT rajibshaw integrationofsetssocialecologicaltechnologicalsystemsframeworkandfloodresiliencecycleforsmartfloodriskmanagement