Legal Status of the Odnodvortsy: Problems and Contradictions

As a result of Peter the Great’s reforms, some categories of the population whose representatives were not included into any social estate appeared in the Russian Empire. To denote them in legislative acts and office documents, the terms odnodvorets (plural odnodvortsy) and raznochinets (plural razn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kseniya К. Bileush
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cherepovets State University 2023-03-01
Series:Historia provinciae: журнал региональной истории
Subjects:
Online Access:http://en.hpchsu.ru/archived-issues/the-journal-of-regional-history-v-7-no-1/legal-status-of-the-odnodvortsy-problems-and-contradictions/
_version_ 1797864643772809216
author Kseniya К. Bileush
author_facet Kseniya К. Bileush
author_sort Kseniya К. Bileush
collection DOAJ
description As a result of Peter the Great’s reforms, some categories of the population whose representatives were not included into any social estate appeared in the Russian Empire. To denote them in legislative acts and office documents, the terms odnodvorets (plural odnodvortsy) and raznochinets (plural raznochintsy) were introduced. This article is devoted to the determination of the legal status of the odnodvortsy as a specific category of population of the Russian Empire. It examines the main problems and contradictions related to the ways of acquiring the status of odnodvorets, the evolution of its legal definition, the composition of the odnodvortsy, and the determination of their rights and obligations. By means of factual material, the author confirms the main contradiction of the odnodvortsy status, associated with its duality. On the one hand, odnodvortsy were equated with peasants as they were obliged to pay a poll tax in the same amount as the peasants who belonged to them did, to do landmilitia (frontier) service, and to lead a communal life. On the other hand, they had the rights of the noble estate, namely, the right to own peasants and land. Another contradiction was that the rights of the noble estate were limited for the odnodvortsy: the purchase and sale (as well as other disposal) of peasants and land were prohibited to them. The author comes to the conclusion that the inconsistency of the legal status of the odnodvortsy was a consequence of the heterogeneity of this category of the population, associated with the existence of many ways to replenish it and the difficulty for the authorities in determining the functions of this social estate, which changed over time. The problems were connected with the dying out need to maintain landmilitia regiments (the traditional main civic duty of the odnodvortsy): in the new conditions, the authorities needed to clearly determine the status of this category of population, but they could neither lower it to peasants nor raise it to the nobility, fearing criticism and discontent of both the noblemen and the odnodvortsy themselves. Odnodvortsy were given an opportunity to join the merchant estate, losing land in doing so, and after 1762 they were given an opportunity to join the nobility, thus increasing the stratum of gentry. Thus, the odnodvortsy were an intermediate taxable category of Russian society whose place in social structure was between the nobility and the state peasants. By the beginning of the 19th century, the authorities had not determined the status of the Odnodvortsy more precisely.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:55:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-951f8b515135473a818eec5356bef57c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2587-8344
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:55:13Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Cherepovets State University
record_format Article
series Historia provinciae: журнал региональной истории
spelling doaj.art-951f8b515135473a818eec5356bef57c2023-03-22T11:18:16ZengCherepovets State UniversityHistoria provinciae: журнал региональной истории2587-83442023-03-017115918910.23859/2587-8344-2023-7-1-4Legal Status of the Odnodvortsy: Problems and ContradictionsKseniya К. Bileush0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-7430Herzen State Pedagogical University of RussiaAs a result of Peter the Great’s reforms, some categories of the population whose representatives were not included into any social estate appeared in the Russian Empire. To denote them in legislative acts and office documents, the terms odnodvorets (plural odnodvortsy) and raznochinets (plural raznochintsy) were introduced. This article is devoted to the determination of the legal status of the odnodvortsy as a specific category of population of the Russian Empire. It examines the main problems and contradictions related to the ways of acquiring the status of odnodvorets, the evolution of its legal definition, the composition of the odnodvortsy, and the determination of their rights and obligations. By means of factual material, the author confirms the main contradiction of the odnodvortsy status, associated with its duality. On the one hand, odnodvortsy were equated with peasants as they were obliged to pay a poll tax in the same amount as the peasants who belonged to them did, to do landmilitia (frontier) service, and to lead a communal life. On the other hand, they had the rights of the noble estate, namely, the right to own peasants and land. Another contradiction was that the rights of the noble estate were limited for the odnodvortsy: the purchase and sale (as well as other disposal) of peasants and land were prohibited to them. The author comes to the conclusion that the inconsistency of the legal status of the odnodvortsy was a consequence of the heterogeneity of this category of the population, associated with the existence of many ways to replenish it and the difficulty for the authorities in determining the functions of this social estate, which changed over time. The problems were connected with the dying out need to maintain landmilitia regiments (the traditional main civic duty of the odnodvortsy): in the new conditions, the authorities needed to clearly determine the status of this category of population, but they could neither lower it to peasants nor raise it to the nobility, fearing criticism and discontent of both the noblemen and the odnodvortsy themselves. Odnodvortsy were given an opportunity to join the merchant estate, losing land in doing so, and after 1762 they were given an opportunity to join the nobility, thus increasing the stratum of gentry. Thus, the odnodvortsy were an intermediate taxable category of Russian society whose place in social structure was between the nobility and the state peasants. By the beginning of the 19th century, the authorities had not determined the status of the Odnodvortsy more precisely.http://en.hpchsu.ru/archived-issues/the-journal-of-regional-history-v-7-no-1/legal-status-of-the-odnodvortsy-problems-and-contradictions/odnodvoretsnobilitystate peasantspeasantrysocial historyrussian empiretaxable estateslegislative actlegal statuslandowners
spellingShingle Kseniya К. Bileush
Legal Status of the Odnodvortsy: Problems and Contradictions
Historia provinciae: журнал региональной истории
odnodvorets
nobility
state peasants
peasantry
social history
russian empire
taxable estates
legislative act
legal status
landowners
title Legal Status of the Odnodvortsy: Problems and Contradictions
title_full Legal Status of the Odnodvortsy: Problems and Contradictions
title_fullStr Legal Status of the Odnodvortsy: Problems and Contradictions
title_full_unstemmed Legal Status of the Odnodvortsy: Problems and Contradictions
title_short Legal Status of the Odnodvortsy: Problems and Contradictions
title_sort legal status of the odnodvortsy problems and contradictions
topic odnodvorets
nobility
state peasants
peasantry
social history
russian empire
taxable estates
legislative act
legal status
landowners
url http://en.hpchsu.ru/archived-issues/the-journal-of-regional-history-v-7-no-1/legal-status-of-the-odnodvortsy-problems-and-contradictions/
work_keys_str_mv AT kseniyakbileush legalstatusoftheodnodvortsyproblemsandcontradictions