VOICE PROSTHESES – TEN YEARS AFTER

<p>Since the introduction of tracheoesophageal puncture method by Bloom and Singer in 1980, the success of restoring vocal communication in laryngectomees has improved significantly. At the University Department of Otorhinolaringology and Cervicofacial Surgery in Ljubljana, the method has been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Igor Fajdiga, Irena Hočevar Boltežar, Miha Žargi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Slovenian Medical Association 2002-12-01
Series:Zdravniški Vestnik
Subjects:
Online Access:http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1774
_version_ 1828328765272358912
author Igor Fajdiga
Irena Hočevar Boltežar
Miha Žargi
author_facet Igor Fajdiga
Irena Hočevar Boltežar
Miha Žargi
author_sort Igor Fajdiga
collection DOAJ
description <p>Since the introduction of tracheoesophageal puncture method by Bloom and Singer in 1980, the success of restoring vocal communication in laryngectomees has improved significantly. At the University Department of Otorhinolaringology and Cervicofacial Surgery in Ljubljana, the method has been used since 1993. We have performed 76 secondary tracheoesophageal punctures in patients with no objective contraindications and with an interest for this method. The success rate was 92%. With regard to our 10-years experience, we wanted to (re) define present and future role of tracheoesophageal voice/speech in the alaryngeal voice rehabilitation. To compare both alaryngeal speech modes, 32 patients using tracheoesophageal speech and 35 patients using esophageal speech were included into the study. In both groups the patients were established speakers. The complications that occurred in the patients with voice prostheses are presented. Most of them required only replacement of prostheses for their solution.</p><p>The tracheoesophageal puncture and voice prosthesis insertion is a reliable and fast way of restoring good voice and speech after laryngectomy. In spite of some objective disadvantage in comparison to esophageal speech – like the use of hand, need for regular maintenance, and relying to medical service, its good characteristics should rank it immediately after a good esophageal speech. This means that tracheoesophageal voice prostheses should be offered to all patients, which are not able to learn a good esophageal voice in short time, to avoid a frustrating time with no vocal communication. After tracheoesophageal puncture and voice prosthesis insertion, the patient should still get a possibility to learn esophageal speech if he wants to avoid the drawbacks of the tracheoesophageal speech.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:14:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-952689da91e745ab8cca67a5e2c5984c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1318-0347
1581-0224
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:14:33Z
publishDate 2002-12-01
publisher Slovenian Medical Association
record_format Article
series Zdravniški Vestnik
spelling doaj.art-952689da91e745ab8cca67a5e2c5984c2022-12-22T02:31:45ZengSlovenian Medical AssociationZdravniški Vestnik1318-03471581-02242002-12-017101282VOICE PROSTHESES – TEN YEARS AFTERIgor Fajdiga0Irena Hočevar Boltežar1Miha Žargi2University Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery Clinical Center Zaloška cesta 2 1525 LjubljanaUniversity Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery Clinical Center Zaloška cesta 2 1525 LjubljanaUniversity Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery Clinical Center Zaloška cesta 2 1525 Ljubljana<p>Since the introduction of tracheoesophageal puncture method by Bloom and Singer in 1980, the success of restoring vocal communication in laryngectomees has improved significantly. At the University Department of Otorhinolaringology and Cervicofacial Surgery in Ljubljana, the method has been used since 1993. We have performed 76 secondary tracheoesophageal punctures in patients with no objective contraindications and with an interest for this method. The success rate was 92%. With regard to our 10-years experience, we wanted to (re) define present and future role of tracheoesophageal voice/speech in the alaryngeal voice rehabilitation. To compare both alaryngeal speech modes, 32 patients using tracheoesophageal speech and 35 patients using esophageal speech were included into the study. In both groups the patients were established speakers. The complications that occurred in the patients with voice prostheses are presented. Most of them required only replacement of prostheses for their solution.</p><p>The tracheoesophageal puncture and voice prosthesis insertion is a reliable and fast way of restoring good voice and speech after laryngectomy. In spite of some objective disadvantage in comparison to esophageal speech – like the use of hand, need for regular maintenance, and relying to medical service, its good characteristics should rank it immediately after a good esophageal speech. This means that tracheoesophageal voice prostheses should be offered to all patients, which are not able to learn a good esophageal voice in short time, to avoid a frustrating time with no vocal communication. After tracheoesophageal puncture and voice prosthesis insertion, the patient should still get a possibility to learn esophageal speech if he wants to avoid the drawbacks of the tracheoesophageal speech.</p>http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1774laryngectomyalaryngeal voicespeech, esophageal, traheoesophageal
spellingShingle Igor Fajdiga
Irena Hočevar Boltežar
Miha Žargi
VOICE PROSTHESES – TEN YEARS AFTER
Zdravniški Vestnik
laryngectomy
alaryngeal voice
speech, esophageal, traheoesophageal
title VOICE PROSTHESES – TEN YEARS AFTER
title_full VOICE PROSTHESES – TEN YEARS AFTER
title_fullStr VOICE PROSTHESES – TEN YEARS AFTER
title_full_unstemmed VOICE PROSTHESES – TEN YEARS AFTER
title_short VOICE PROSTHESES – TEN YEARS AFTER
title_sort voice prostheses ten years after
topic laryngectomy
alaryngeal voice
speech, esophageal, traheoesophageal
url http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/1774
work_keys_str_mv AT igorfajdiga voiceprosthesestenyearsafter
AT irenahocevarboltezar voiceprosthesestenyearsafter
AT mihazargi voiceprosthesestenyearsafter