Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Assessment for National Park Infrastructure Proximal to Taranaki Volcano (New Zealand)

Hazard assessment for infrastructure proximal to a volcanic vent raises issues that are often not present, or not as severe in hazard assessments for more distal infrastructure. Proximal regions are subject to a greater number of hazardous phenomena, and variability in impact intensity increases wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stuart Mead, Jonathan Procter, Mark Bebbington, Cecilia Rodriguez-Gomez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Earth Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.832531/full
_version_ 1818313131814813696
author Stuart Mead
Jonathan Procter
Mark Bebbington
Cecilia Rodriguez-Gomez
author_facet Stuart Mead
Jonathan Procter
Mark Bebbington
Cecilia Rodriguez-Gomez
author_sort Stuart Mead
collection DOAJ
description Hazard assessment for infrastructure proximal to a volcanic vent raises issues that are often not present, or not as severe in hazard assessments for more distal infrastructure. Proximal regions are subject to a greater number of hazardous phenomena, and variability in impact intensity increases with the hazard magnitude. To probabilistically quantify volcanic hazard to infrastructure, multiple volcanic hazards and their effects on exposed elements need to be considered. Compared to single-hazard assessments, multi-hazard assessments increase the size and complexity of determining hazard occurrence and magnitude, typically introducing additional uncertainties in the quantification of risk. A location-centred approach, focusing on key locations rather than key hazards, can simplify the problem to one requiring identification of hazards with the potential to affect the location, followed by assessment of the probability of these hazards and their triggering eruptions. The location-centred approach is more compatible to multi-source hazards and allows for different hazard estimation methodologies to be applied as appropriate for the infrastructure type. We present a probabilistic quantification of volcanic hazard using this location centred approach for infrastructure within Te Papakura o Taranaki National Park, New Zealand. The impact to proposed park infrastructure from volcanic activity (originating from Mt. Taranaki) is quantified using a probability chain to provide a structured approach to integrate differing hazard estimation methods with eruption probability estimates within asset lifetimes.This location-centered approach provides quantitative estimates for volcanic hazards that significantly improve volcanic hazard estimates for infrastructure proximal to the Taranaki summit vent. Volcanic mass flows, predominantly pyroclastic surges or block and ash flows, are most likely (probability >0.8) to affect walking tracks if an eruption occurs. The probability of one or more eruption(s) in the next 50 years is estimated at 0.35–0.38. This use of probability chains and a location centered assessment demonstrates a technique that can be applied to proximal hazard assessments globally.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T08:28:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-953d02ae2ffd480f8bbf6139bca96bd1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-6463
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T08:28:52Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Earth Science
spelling doaj.art-953d02ae2ffd480f8bbf6139bca96bd12022-12-21T23:53:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Earth Science2296-64632022-03-011010.3389/feart.2022.832531832531Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Assessment for National Park Infrastructure Proximal to Taranaki Volcano (New Zealand)Stuart MeadJonathan ProcterMark BebbingtonCecilia Rodriguez-GomezHazard assessment for infrastructure proximal to a volcanic vent raises issues that are often not present, or not as severe in hazard assessments for more distal infrastructure. Proximal regions are subject to a greater number of hazardous phenomena, and variability in impact intensity increases with the hazard magnitude. To probabilistically quantify volcanic hazard to infrastructure, multiple volcanic hazards and their effects on exposed elements need to be considered. Compared to single-hazard assessments, multi-hazard assessments increase the size and complexity of determining hazard occurrence and magnitude, typically introducing additional uncertainties in the quantification of risk. A location-centred approach, focusing on key locations rather than key hazards, can simplify the problem to one requiring identification of hazards with the potential to affect the location, followed by assessment of the probability of these hazards and their triggering eruptions. The location-centred approach is more compatible to multi-source hazards and allows for different hazard estimation methodologies to be applied as appropriate for the infrastructure type. We present a probabilistic quantification of volcanic hazard using this location centred approach for infrastructure within Te Papakura o Taranaki National Park, New Zealand. The impact to proposed park infrastructure from volcanic activity (originating from Mt. Taranaki) is quantified using a probability chain to provide a structured approach to integrate differing hazard estimation methods with eruption probability estimates within asset lifetimes.This location-centered approach provides quantitative estimates for volcanic hazards that significantly improve volcanic hazard estimates for infrastructure proximal to the Taranaki summit vent. Volcanic mass flows, predominantly pyroclastic surges or block and ash flows, are most likely (probability >0.8) to affect walking tracks if an eruption occurs. The probability of one or more eruption(s) in the next 50 years is estimated at 0.35–0.38. This use of probability chains and a location centered assessment demonstrates a technique that can be applied to proximal hazard assessments globally.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.832531/fullvolcanic forecastingevent treeprobablistic hazard assessmentvolcanic hazardvolcanic mass flowsvolcanic ashfall
spellingShingle Stuart Mead
Jonathan Procter
Mark Bebbington
Cecilia Rodriguez-Gomez
Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Assessment for National Park Infrastructure Proximal to Taranaki Volcano (New Zealand)
Frontiers in Earth Science
volcanic forecasting
event tree
probablistic hazard assessment
volcanic hazard
volcanic mass flows
volcanic ashfall
title Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Assessment for National Park Infrastructure Proximal to Taranaki Volcano (New Zealand)
title_full Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Assessment for National Park Infrastructure Proximal to Taranaki Volcano (New Zealand)
title_fullStr Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Assessment for National Park Infrastructure Proximal to Taranaki Volcano (New Zealand)
title_full_unstemmed Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Assessment for National Park Infrastructure Proximal to Taranaki Volcano (New Zealand)
title_short Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Assessment for National Park Infrastructure Proximal to Taranaki Volcano (New Zealand)
title_sort probabilistic volcanic hazard assessment for national park infrastructure proximal to taranaki volcano new zealand
topic volcanic forecasting
event tree
probablistic hazard assessment
volcanic hazard
volcanic mass flows
volcanic ashfall
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.832531/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stuartmead probabilisticvolcanichazardassessmentfornationalparkinfrastructureproximaltotaranakivolcanonewzealand
AT jonathanprocter probabilisticvolcanichazardassessmentfornationalparkinfrastructureproximaltotaranakivolcanonewzealand
AT markbebbington probabilisticvolcanichazardassessmentfornationalparkinfrastructureproximaltotaranakivolcanonewzealand
AT ceciliarodriguezgomez probabilisticvolcanichazardassessmentfornationalparkinfrastructureproximaltotaranakivolcanonewzealand