THE RECOVERY OF LOST PROFITS UNDER ARTICLE 74 OF THE U.N. CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS

The ability to obtain damages for losses suffered in the course of trade is a critical and necessary requirement for parties to be willing to engage in commerce. Without legal recourse for losses as a consequence of other parties’ nonperformance, the incentive to participate in trade is greatly dimi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Damon Schwartz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aalborg University Open Publishing 2006-01-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
Online Access:https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3049
_version_ 1797229260273876992
author Damon Schwartz
author_facet Damon Schwartz
author_sort Damon Schwartz
collection DOAJ
description The ability to obtain damages for losses suffered in the course of trade is a critical and necessary requirement for parties to be willing to engage in commerce. Without legal recourse for losses as a consequence of other parties’ nonperformance, the incentive to participate in trade is greatly diminished. International commerce is hampered to the extent that parties from different countries risk trading under foreign laws that might not offer comparable protection. The availability of relief for a breach of contract accords with economic efficiency in a free enterprise economy.1 The U.N. Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) was created in 1980 to codify and harmonize a legal framework aimed at encouraging and facilitating international trade. An important feature of the CISG is Article 74, which provides a guide for the recovery of foreseeable losses, including lost profits, as a consequence of a party’s breach of contract.2 This right to obtain damages is a primary mechanism of the CISG remedial scheme.3 This paper will examine the recovery of lost profits under Article 74 CISG and discuss the practical issues that tribunals and parties face when evaluating a lost profit claim. Decisions concerning the recovery of lost profits under the CISG have been criticized as lacking uniformity due to problems in interpreting Article 74 CISG, differences in domestic evidentiary standards, use or nonuse of general principles of international law, arbitrator discretion, and difficulties in the actual calculation of lost profits.4 A discussion of these issues will attempt to shed light on the problems and determine if there is a lack of uniformity, and if so, what steps can be taken to increase the consistency of awards.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T15:09:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-953efadec8f04ea6985cad780c84566a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1459-9686
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T15:09:46Z
publishDate 2006-01-01
publisher Aalborg University Open Publishing
record_format Article
series Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
spelling doaj.art-953efadec8f04ea6985cad780c84566a2024-04-02T11:53:33ZengAalborg University Open PublishingNordic Journal of Commercial Law1459-96862006-01-011THE RECOVERY OF LOST PROFITS UNDER ARTICLE 74 OF THE U.N. CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODSDamon SchwartzThe ability to obtain damages for losses suffered in the course of trade is a critical and necessary requirement for parties to be willing to engage in commerce. Without legal recourse for losses as a consequence of other parties’ nonperformance, the incentive to participate in trade is greatly diminished. International commerce is hampered to the extent that parties from different countries risk trading under foreign laws that might not offer comparable protection. The availability of relief for a breach of contract accords with economic efficiency in a free enterprise economy.1 The U.N. Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) was created in 1980 to codify and harmonize a legal framework aimed at encouraging and facilitating international trade. An important feature of the CISG is Article 74, which provides a guide for the recovery of foreseeable losses, including lost profits, as a consequence of a party’s breach of contract.2 This right to obtain damages is a primary mechanism of the CISG remedial scheme.3 This paper will examine the recovery of lost profits under Article 74 CISG and discuss the practical issues that tribunals and parties face when evaluating a lost profit claim. Decisions concerning the recovery of lost profits under the CISG have been criticized as lacking uniformity due to problems in interpreting Article 74 CISG, differences in domestic evidentiary standards, use or nonuse of general principles of international law, arbitrator discretion, and difficulties in the actual calculation of lost profits.4 A discussion of these issues will attempt to shed light on the problems and determine if there is a lack of uniformity, and if so, what steps can be taken to increase the consistency of awards.https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3049
spellingShingle Damon Schwartz
THE RECOVERY OF LOST PROFITS UNDER ARTICLE 74 OF THE U.N. CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS
Nordic Journal of Commercial Law
title THE RECOVERY OF LOST PROFITS UNDER ARTICLE 74 OF THE U.N. CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS
title_full THE RECOVERY OF LOST PROFITS UNDER ARTICLE 74 OF THE U.N. CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS
title_fullStr THE RECOVERY OF LOST PROFITS UNDER ARTICLE 74 OF THE U.N. CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS
title_full_unstemmed THE RECOVERY OF LOST PROFITS UNDER ARTICLE 74 OF THE U.N. CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS
title_short THE RECOVERY OF LOST PROFITS UNDER ARTICLE 74 OF THE U.N. CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS
title_sort recovery of lost profits under article 74 of the u n convention on the international sale of goods
url https://somaesthetics.aau.dk/index.php/NJCL/article/view/3049
work_keys_str_mv AT damonschwartz therecoveryoflostprofitsunderarticle74oftheunconventionontheinternationalsaleofgoods
AT damonschwartz recoveryoflostprofitsunderarticle74oftheunconventionontheinternationalsaleofgoods