THE RIGHT TO ORAL HEARING IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PUBLIC SERVANTS: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE

The decisions of disciplinary authorities in disciplinary proceedings continue to be judicially reviewed on the grounds of their failure to grant an oral hearing to affected public servants albeit there is a well-established principle by the Privy Council in Najar Singh’s case since 1976. Such fa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zukiferee Ibrahim, Abdul Majid Tahir Mohamed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UUM Press 2020-03-01
Series:UUM Journal of Legal Studies
Online Access:https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/9120
_version_ 1828049017166102528
author Zukiferee Ibrahim
Abdul Majid Tahir Mohamed
author_facet Zukiferee Ibrahim
Abdul Majid Tahir Mohamed
author_sort Zukiferee Ibrahim
collection DOAJ
description The decisions of disciplinary authorities in disciplinary proceedings continue to be judicially reviewed on the grounds of their failure to grant an oral hearing to affected public servants albeit there is a well-established principle by the Privy Council in Najar Singh’s case since 1976. Such failure may implicate the deliverance of justice, and affect the reputation and goodwill of the Malaysian government as the major employer in the nation. The constitutional protection of a reasonable opportunity of being heard to public servants under Article 135(2) in the case of dismissal and reduction of rank should be interpreted in the light of the fundamental right to life as enshrined in the Federal Constitution. The purpose of this article is to examine the approaches of the court in determining the right to an oral hearing in disciplinary proceedings against public servants; and whether the administrative decisions of the disciplinary authorities should be subject to judicial review or not. This paper forwarded a submission that the court should adopt a liberal approach in determining the right to an oral hearing in disciplinary proceedings against public servants.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T19:05:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-9540cedf09d544ea86451ce1e40e8a98
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2229-984X
0127-9483
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T19:05:47Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher UUM Press
record_format Article
series UUM Journal of Legal Studies
spelling doaj.art-9540cedf09d544ea86451ce1e40e8a982023-01-31T03:11:33ZengUUM PressUUM Journal of Legal Studies2229-984X0127-94832020-03-01101THE RIGHT TO ORAL HEARING IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PUBLIC SERVANTS: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVEZukiferee Ibrahim0Abdul Majid Tahir Mohamed1Faculty of Law and International Relation Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, MalaysiaFaculty of Law and International Relation Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia The decisions of disciplinary authorities in disciplinary proceedings continue to be judicially reviewed on the grounds of their failure to grant an oral hearing to affected public servants albeit there is a well-established principle by the Privy Council in Najar Singh’s case since 1976. Such failure may implicate the deliverance of justice, and affect the reputation and goodwill of the Malaysian government as the major employer in the nation. The constitutional protection of a reasonable opportunity of being heard to public servants under Article 135(2) in the case of dismissal and reduction of rank should be interpreted in the light of the fundamental right to life as enshrined in the Federal Constitution. The purpose of this article is to examine the approaches of the court in determining the right to an oral hearing in disciplinary proceedings against public servants; and whether the administrative decisions of the disciplinary authorities should be subject to judicial review or not. This paper forwarded a submission that the court should adopt a liberal approach in determining the right to an oral hearing in disciplinary proceedings against public servants. https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/9120
spellingShingle Zukiferee Ibrahim
Abdul Majid Tahir Mohamed
THE RIGHT TO ORAL HEARING IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PUBLIC SERVANTS: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
title THE RIGHT TO ORAL HEARING IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PUBLIC SERVANTS: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE
title_full THE RIGHT TO ORAL HEARING IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PUBLIC SERVANTS: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE
title_fullStr THE RIGHT TO ORAL HEARING IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PUBLIC SERVANTS: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE
title_full_unstemmed THE RIGHT TO ORAL HEARING IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PUBLIC SERVANTS: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE
title_short THE RIGHT TO ORAL HEARING IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PUBLIC SERVANTS: A MALAYSIAN PERSPECTIVE
title_sort right to oral hearing in disciplinary proceedings against public servants a malaysian perspective
url https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/9120
work_keys_str_mv AT zukifereeibrahim therighttooralhearingindisciplinaryproceedingsagainstpublicservantsamalaysianperspective
AT abdulmajidtahirmohamed therighttooralhearingindisciplinaryproceedingsagainstpublicservantsamalaysianperspective
AT zukifereeibrahim righttooralhearingindisciplinaryproceedingsagainstpublicservantsamalaysianperspective
AT abdulmajidtahirmohamed righttooralhearingindisciplinaryproceedingsagainstpublicservantsamalaysianperspective