Diagnostic Performance of Sonoelastography in Addition to Ultrasound in Investigating Breast Lesions: Can Concomitant Use of These Techniques Lead to Improvement of Differentiation?

Background: Sonoelastography (SE) is introduced as a complementary technique for ultrasoungraohy (US) to evaluate breast lesions. This method is based on tissue strain in response to compression and decompression. The current study was designed to investigate the diagnostic performance of SE for dif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Rahmani, Kiana Hassanpour, Hurieh Alain, Mohamadreza Neishaboury, Forough Yazdanian, Rasoul Mirsharifi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kaviani Breast Disease Institute 2014-08-01
Series:Archives of Breast Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/5
_version_ 1818555754291920896
author Maryam Rahmani
Kiana Hassanpour
Hurieh Alain
Mohamadreza Neishaboury
Forough Yazdanian
Rasoul Mirsharifi
author_facet Maryam Rahmani
Kiana Hassanpour
Hurieh Alain
Mohamadreza Neishaboury
Forough Yazdanian
Rasoul Mirsharifi
author_sort Maryam Rahmani
collection DOAJ
description Background: Sonoelastography (SE) is introduced as a complementary technique for ultrasoungraohy (US) to evaluate breast lesions. This method is based on tissue strain in response to compression and decompression. The current study was designed to investigate the diagnostic performance of SE for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions Methods: A total of 35 women with 45 breast lesions who were referred to a university affiliated hospital in Tehran were enrolled. All patients were visited and examined by a same radiologist. A five-point scale was applied for categorizing lesions in SE as malignant or benign. The results of US and SE were compared with histopathological results to calculate sensitivity and specificity of each mentioned techniques. Results: Histopathological evaluations in 12 cases were in favor of malignancy, and the rest of cases were classified as benign. The sensitivity and specificity for US were 100% and 69.7%, respectively. On other hand, SE obtained a lower sensitivity (58.3%) and higher specificity (90.9%) in comparison with US. Conclusions: simultaneous evaluation of suspicious breast lesions with both US and SE can have high sensitivity and specificity and prevent the unnecessary invasive interventions.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T09:57:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-955f32c05c874cc89bad911815df872c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2383-0433
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T09:57:43Z
publishDate 2014-08-01
publisher Kaviani Breast Disease Institute
record_format Article
series Archives of Breast Cancer
spelling doaj.art-955f32c05c874cc89bad911815df872c2022-12-22T00:28:05ZengKaviani Breast Disease InstituteArchives of Breast Cancer2383-04332014-08-011210.19187/abc.20141264-685Diagnostic Performance of Sonoelastography in Addition to Ultrasound in Investigating Breast Lesions: Can Concomitant Use of These Techniques Lead to Improvement of Differentiation?Maryam Rahmani0Kiana Hassanpour1Hurieh Alain2Mohamadreza Neishaboury3Forough Yazdanian4Rasoul Mirsharifi5Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Department of Radiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranDepartment of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranDepartment of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranDepartment of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranBackground: Sonoelastography (SE) is introduced as a complementary technique for ultrasoungraohy (US) to evaluate breast lesions. This method is based on tissue strain in response to compression and decompression. The current study was designed to investigate the diagnostic performance of SE for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions Methods: A total of 35 women with 45 breast lesions who were referred to a university affiliated hospital in Tehran were enrolled. All patients were visited and examined by a same radiologist. A five-point scale was applied for categorizing lesions in SE as malignant or benign. The results of US and SE were compared with histopathological results to calculate sensitivity and specificity of each mentioned techniques. Results: Histopathological evaluations in 12 cases were in favor of malignancy, and the rest of cases were classified as benign. The sensitivity and specificity for US were 100% and 69.7%, respectively. On other hand, SE obtained a lower sensitivity (58.3%) and higher specificity (90.9%) in comparison with US. Conclusions: simultaneous evaluation of suspicious breast lesions with both US and SE can have high sensitivity and specificity and prevent the unnecessary invasive interventions.https://archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/5SonoelastographyUltrasounographybreast mass
spellingShingle Maryam Rahmani
Kiana Hassanpour
Hurieh Alain
Mohamadreza Neishaboury
Forough Yazdanian
Rasoul Mirsharifi
Diagnostic Performance of Sonoelastography in Addition to Ultrasound in Investigating Breast Lesions: Can Concomitant Use of These Techniques Lead to Improvement of Differentiation?
Archives of Breast Cancer
Sonoelastography
Ultrasounography
breast mass
title Diagnostic Performance of Sonoelastography in Addition to Ultrasound in Investigating Breast Lesions: Can Concomitant Use of These Techniques Lead to Improvement of Differentiation?
title_full Diagnostic Performance of Sonoelastography in Addition to Ultrasound in Investigating Breast Lesions: Can Concomitant Use of These Techniques Lead to Improvement of Differentiation?
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of Sonoelastography in Addition to Ultrasound in Investigating Breast Lesions: Can Concomitant Use of These Techniques Lead to Improvement of Differentiation?
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of Sonoelastography in Addition to Ultrasound in Investigating Breast Lesions: Can Concomitant Use of These Techniques Lead to Improvement of Differentiation?
title_short Diagnostic Performance of Sonoelastography in Addition to Ultrasound in Investigating Breast Lesions: Can Concomitant Use of These Techniques Lead to Improvement of Differentiation?
title_sort diagnostic performance of sonoelastography in addition to ultrasound in investigating breast lesions can concomitant use of these techniques lead to improvement of differentiation
topic Sonoelastography
Ultrasounography
breast mass
url https://archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/5
work_keys_str_mv AT maryamrahmani diagnosticperformanceofsonoelastographyinadditiontoultrasoundininvestigatingbreastlesionscanconcomitantuseofthesetechniquesleadtoimprovementofdifferentiation
AT kianahassanpour diagnosticperformanceofsonoelastographyinadditiontoultrasoundininvestigatingbreastlesionscanconcomitantuseofthesetechniquesleadtoimprovementofdifferentiation
AT huriehalain diagnosticperformanceofsonoelastographyinadditiontoultrasoundininvestigatingbreastlesionscanconcomitantuseofthesetechniquesleadtoimprovementofdifferentiation
AT mohamadrezaneishaboury diagnosticperformanceofsonoelastographyinadditiontoultrasoundininvestigatingbreastlesionscanconcomitantuseofthesetechniquesleadtoimprovementofdifferentiation
AT foroughyazdanian diagnosticperformanceofsonoelastographyinadditiontoultrasoundininvestigatingbreastlesionscanconcomitantuseofthesetechniquesleadtoimprovementofdifferentiation
AT rasoulmirsharifi diagnosticperformanceofsonoelastographyinadditiontoultrasoundininvestigatingbreastlesionscanconcomitantuseofthesetechniquesleadtoimprovementofdifferentiation