A tri‐level approach for coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion planning considering deployment of energy hubs
Abstract This paper presents a tri‐level stochastic coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion (CTDS) planning considering the deployment of energy hubs (EHs) across the distribution systems (DSs). The first level of the proposed optimization approach deals with transmission system e...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12580 |
| _version_ | 1798004517016436736 |
|---|---|
| author | Yousef Allahvirdizadeh Heidarali Shayanfar Mohsen Parsa Moghaddam |
| author_facet | Yousef Allahvirdizadeh Heidarali Shayanfar Mohsen Parsa Moghaddam |
| author_sort | Yousef Allahvirdizadeh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract This paper presents a tri‐level stochastic coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion (CTDS) planning considering the deployment of energy hubs (EHs) across the distribution systems (DSs). The first level of the proposed optimization approach deals with transmission system expansion planning (TEP), while the second level develops distribution system expansion planning (DEP). Market clearing is done in the third level to update the locational marginal prices (LMPs) for different distribution system operators (DSOs). The EHs include photovoltaic cells (PVs), wind turbines (WTs), combined heating and power units (CHPs), boilers, and electrical and absorption chillers. The proposed tri‐level approach is solved with an iterative algorithm based on the diagonalization approach and tested on the modified IEEE 30‐bus transmission systems (TS) with several DSOs. Each DSO includes 18‐bus electrical, heating, and cooling energy systems. The numerical analysis shows that the total cost of the transmission system operator (TSO) is not changed with implementing the uncoordinated approach. However, the total cost of the whole system is reduced by 6.54% with accommodation of the EHs in the uncoordinated approach. Moreover, the total cost of the TSO as well as the whole system are reduced by 41.11% and 16.96%, respectively, with the proposed (CTDS) planning. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T12:24:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-95839deb571f4e5ea87b4e305a1773c4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1751-8687 1751-8695 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T12:24:58Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution |
| spelling | doaj.art-95839deb571f4e5ea87b4e305a1773c42022-12-22T04:23:59ZengWileyIET Generation, Transmission & Distribution1751-86871751-86952022-10-0116193966400610.1049/gtd2.12580A tri‐level approach for coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion planning considering deployment of energy hubsYousef Allahvirdizadeh0Heidarali Shayanfar1Mohsen Parsa Moghaddam2School of Electrical Engineering Iran University of Science and Technology, Center of Excellence for Power Systems Automation and Operation Tehran IranSchool of Electrical Engineering Iran University of Science and Technology, Center of Excellence for Power Systems Automation and Operation Tehran IranSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering Tarbiat Modares University Tehran IranAbstract This paper presents a tri‐level stochastic coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion (CTDS) planning considering the deployment of energy hubs (EHs) across the distribution systems (DSs). The first level of the proposed optimization approach deals with transmission system expansion planning (TEP), while the second level develops distribution system expansion planning (DEP). Market clearing is done in the third level to update the locational marginal prices (LMPs) for different distribution system operators (DSOs). The EHs include photovoltaic cells (PVs), wind turbines (WTs), combined heating and power units (CHPs), boilers, and electrical and absorption chillers. The proposed tri‐level approach is solved with an iterative algorithm based on the diagonalization approach and tested on the modified IEEE 30‐bus transmission systems (TS) with several DSOs. Each DSO includes 18‐bus electrical, heating, and cooling energy systems. The numerical analysis shows that the total cost of the transmission system operator (TSO) is not changed with implementing the uncoordinated approach. However, the total cost of the whole system is reduced by 6.54% with accommodation of the EHs in the uncoordinated approach. Moreover, the total cost of the TSO as well as the whole system are reduced by 41.11% and 16.96%, respectively, with the proposed (CTDS) planning.https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12580 |
| spellingShingle | Yousef Allahvirdizadeh Heidarali Shayanfar Mohsen Parsa Moghaddam A tri‐level approach for coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion planning considering deployment of energy hubs IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution |
| title | A tri‐level approach for coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion planning considering deployment of energy hubs |
| title_full | A tri‐level approach for coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion planning considering deployment of energy hubs |
| title_fullStr | A tri‐level approach for coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion planning considering deployment of energy hubs |
| title_full_unstemmed | A tri‐level approach for coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion planning considering deployment of energy hubs |
| title_short | A tri‐level approach for coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion planning considering deployment of energy hubs |
| title_sort | tri level approach for coordinated transmission and distribution system expansion planning considering deployment of energy hubs |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12580 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yousefallahvirdizadeh atrilevelapproachforcoordinatedtransmissionanddistributionsystemexpansionplanningconsideringdeploymentofenergyhubs AT heidaralishayanfar atrilevelapproachforcoordinatedtransmissionanddistributionsystemexpansionplanningconsideringdeploymentofenergyhubs AT mohsenparsamoghaddam atrilevelapproachforcoordinatedtransmissionanddistributionsystemexpansionplanningconsideringdeploymentofenergyhubs AT yousefallahvirdizadeh trilevelapproachforcoordinatedtransmissionanddistributionsystemexpansionplanningconsideringdeploymentofenergyhubs AT heidaralishayanfar trilevelapproachforcoordinatedtransmissionanddistributionsystemexpansionplanningconsideringdeploymentofenergyhubs AT mohsenparsamoghaddam trilevelapproachforcoordinatedtransmissionanddistributionsystemexpansionplanningconsideringdeploymentofenergyhubs |