The Use of Advanced Semi-Automated Bone Segmentation in Hallux Rigidus

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography (WBCT) measurements represent a reliable tool for radiographic analysis of the first ray, including multiplanar assessment in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. WBCT can allow for more reliable studies of patho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kepler Carvalho MD, Vinnel Mallavarapu BS, Ryan Jasper BS, Hee Young Lee MD, Nacime SB Mansur MD, Kevin N. Dibbern PhD, Taylor Den Hartog MD, Andrew Behrens, Ki Chun Kim MD, Alexandre L. Godoy-Santos MD, Cesar de Cesar Netto MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-11-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00611
_version_ 1797984215176839168
author Kepler Carvalho MD
Vinnel Mallavarapu BS
Ryan Jasper BS
Hee Young Lee MD
Nacime SB Mansur MD
Kevin N. Dibbern PhD
Taylor Den Hartog MD
Andrew Behrens
Ki Chun Kim MD
Alexandre L. Godoy-Santos MD
Cesar de Cesar Netto MD, PhD
author_facet Kepler Carvalho MD
Vinnel Mallavarapu BS
Ryan Jasper BS
Hee Young Lee MD
Nacime SB Mansur MD
Kevin N. Dibbern PhD
Taylor Den Hartog MD
Andrew Behrens
Ki Chun Kim MD
Alexandre L. Godoy-Santos MD
Cesar de Cesar Netto MD, PhD
author_sort Kepler Carvalho MD
collection DOAJ
description Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography (WBCT) measurements represent a reliable tool for radiographic analysis of the first ray, including multiplanar assessment in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. WBCT can allow for more reliable studies of pathologies, such as Hallux Rigidus (HR), which permits several anatomical points to be evaluated for a correct clinical-radiographic diagnosis. In addition, new software with an advanced semi-automated segmentation system obtains semi-automatic 3D measurements of WBCT scan data sets, minimizing the errors in reading angular measurements. The study`s objective was (1) to assess the reliability of WBCT computer-assisted semi-automatic imaging measurements in HR, (2) to compare semi-automatic to manual measurements in the setting of HR, and (3) to compare semi-automatic measurements between a pathologic (HR) group and a control standard group. Methods: This was a retrospective, IRB approved study of patients with Hallux Rigidus deformity. The sample size calculation was based on the Metatarsus Primus Elevatus (MPE). A control group consisting of 20 feet without HR and a pathologic group consisting of 20 feet with HR was necessary for this study. All WBCT manual and semiautomatic 3D measurements were performed using the following parameters: (1) first Metatarsal-Proximal Phalanx Angle (1stMPP) (sagittal plane), (2) Hallux Valgus Angle (HVA), (3) first to second Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA), (4) Hallux Interphalangeal Angle (IPA), (5) first Metatarsal Lengths (1stML), (6) second Metatarsal Length (2ndML), (7) first Metatarsal Declination Angle (1stMD), (8) second Metatarsal Declination Angles (2ndMD), and (9) MPE. The semiautomatic 3D measurements were performed using the Bonelogic Software. The differences between pathologic and control cases were assessed with a Wilcoxon test and P<= 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Interobserver and intraobserver agreement and consistency for manual versus semi-automatic WBCT measurements assessed by ICC demonstrated excellent reliability. Manual and semi-automatic measurements were performed in individuals with HR. According to the Pearson's coefficient, there was a strong positive linear correlation between both methods for the following parameters evaluated: HVA, (ρ = 0.96); IMA, (ρ = 0.86); IPA, (ρ = 0.89); 1stML, (ρ = 0.96); 2ndML, (ρ = 0.91); 1stMD, (ρ = 0.86); 2ndMD, (ρ = 0.95) and, MPE, (ρ = 0.87). Agreement between the manual and semi-automatic methods was tested using a Bland- Altman plot and expressed excellent agreement between the methods. Comparison between the pathological group with HR and the control (standard) group allowed for the differentiating of the pathological (HR) from the non-pathological conditions for MPE (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Semiautomatic measurements are reproducible and comparable to measurements performed manually, showing excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement and consistency. The software used differentiated pathological from non- pathological conditions only when submitted to semi-automatic MPE measurements. The development of advanced semi-automatic segmentation software with minimal user intervention is an essential step toward the establishment of big data and can be integrated into clinical practice, facilitating decision making.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T06:59:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-958760f65c8c4d48bcc3e751a51737dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2473-0114
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T06:59:04Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-958760f65c8c4d48bcc3e751a51737dc2022-12-22T04:38:54ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142022-11-01710.1177/2473011421S00611The Use of Advanced Semi-Automated Bone Segmentation in Hallux RigidusKepler Carvalho MDVinnel Mallavarapu BSRyan Jasper BSHee Young Lee MDNacime SB Mansur MDKevin N. Dibbern PhDTaylor Den Hartog MDAndrew BehrensKi Chun Kim MDAlexandre L. Godoy-Santos MDCesar de Cesar Netto MD, PhDCategory: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography (WBCT) measurements represent a reliable tool for radiographic analysis of the first ray, including multiplanar assessment in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. WBCT can allow for more reliable studies of pathologies, such as Hallux Rigidus (HR), which permits several anatomical points to be evaluated for a correct clinical-radiographic diagnosis. In addition, new software with an advanced semi-automated segmentation system obtains semi-automatic 3D measurements of WBCT scan data sets, minimizing the errors in reading angular measurements. The study`s objective was (1) to assess the reliability of WBCT computer-assisted semi-automatic imaging measurements in HR, (2) to compare semi-automatic to manual measurements in the setting of HR, and (3) to compare semi-automatic measurements between a pathologic (HR) group and a control standard group. Methods: This was a retrospective, IRB approved study of patients with Hallux Rigidus deformity. The sample size calculation was based on the Metatarsus Primus Elevatus (MPE). A control group consisting of 20 feet without HR and a pathologic group consisting of 20 feet with HR was necessary for this study. All WBCT manual and semiautomatic 3D measurements were performed using the following parameters: (1) first Metatarsal-Proximal Phalanx Angle (1stMPP) (sagittal plane), (2) Hallux Valgus Angle (HVA), (3) first to second Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA), (4) Hallux Interphalangeal Angle (IPA), (5) first Metatarsal Lengths (1stML), (6) second Metatarsal Length (2ndML), (7) first Metatarsal Declination Angle (1stMD), (8) second Metatarsal Declination Angles (2ndMD), and (9) MPE. The semiautomatic 3D measurements were performed using the Bonelogic Software. The differences between pathologic and control cases were assessed with a Wilcoxon test and P<= 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Interobserver and intraobserver agreement and consistency for manual versus semi-automatic WBCT measurements assessed by ICC demonstrated excellent reliability. Manual and semi-automatic measurements were performed in individuals with HR. According to the Pearson's coefficient, there was a strong positive linear correlation between both methods for the following parameters evaluated: HVA, (ρ = 0.96); IMA, (ρ = 0.86); IPA, (ρ = 0.89); 1stML, (ρ = 0.96); 2ndML, (ρ = 0.91); 1stMD, (ρ = 0.86); 2ndMD, (ρ = 0.95) and, MPE, (ρ = 0.87). Agreement between the manual and semi-automatic methods was tested using a Bland- Altman plot and expressed excellent agreement between the methods. Comparison between the pathological group with HR and the control (standard) group allowed for the differentiating of the pathological (HR) from the non-pathological conditions for MPE (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Semiautomatic measurements are reproducible and comparable to measurements performed manually, showing excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement and consistency. The software used differentiated pathological from non- pathological conditions only when submitted to semi-automatic MPE measurements. The development of advanced semi-automatic segmentation software with minimal user intervention is an essential step toward the establishment of big data and can be integrated into clinical practice, facilitating decision making.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00611
spellingShingle Kepler Carvalho MD
Vinnel Mallavarapu BS
Ryan Jasper BS
Hee Young Lee MD
Nacime SB Mansur MD
Kevin N. Dibbern PhD
Taylor Den Hartog MD
Andrew Behrens
Ki Chun Kim MD
Alexandre L. Godoy-Santos MD
Cesar de Cesar Netto MD, PhD
The Use of Advanced Semi-Automated Bone Segmentation in Hallux Rigidus
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title The Use of Advanced Semi-Automated Bone Segmentation in Hallux Rigidus
title_full The Use of Advanced Semi-Automated Bone Segmentation in Hallux Rigidus
title_fullStr The Use of Advanced Semi-Automated Bone Segmentation in Hallux Rigidus
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Advanced Semi-Automated Bone Segmentation in Hallux Rigidus
title_short The Use of Advanced Semi-Automated Bone Segmentation in Hallux Rigidus
title_sort use of advanced semi automated bone segmentation in hallux rigidus
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00611
work_keys_str_mv AT keplercarvalhomd theuseofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT vinnelmallavarapubs theuseofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT ryanjasperbs theuseofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT heeyoungleemd theuseofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT nacimesbmansurmd theuseofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT kevinndibbernphd theuseofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT taylordenhartogmd theuseofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT andrewbehrens theuseofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT kichunkimmd theuseofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT alexandrelgodoysantosmd theuseofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT cesardecesarnettomdphd theuseofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT keplercarvalhomd useofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT vinnelmallavarapubs useofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT ryanjasperbs useofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT heeyoungleemd useofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT nacimesbmansurmd useofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT kevinndibbernphd useofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT taylordenhartogmd useofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT andrewbehrens useofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT kichunkimmd useofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT alexandrelgodoysantosmd useofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus
AT cesardecesarnettomdphd useofadvancedsemiautomatedbonesegmentationinhalluxrigidus