Re-thinking the requirement of making an investment in accordance with domestic laws as a substantive right and a cause of action for host states under the BITs
This paper challenges one of the most traditional notions in international investment arbitration, which is that host states don’t have any substantive rights under the BIT’s framework. This work’s thesis is that the current BIT framework actually grants the host state a substantive right, and there...
Main Author: | Félix Antolín Martínez |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad San Francisco de Quito
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Iuris Dictio |
Subjects: |
Similar Items
-
The surprising effects of the most favored nation clausule (MFN) in regards to foreign investment (a study of the jurisprudence of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes –ICSID-)
by: Viviana Herrera Ramírez
Published: (2009-06-01) -
Discontinuance of arbitration proceedings under the ICSID rules
by: Stanivuković Maja
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Do the SALINI Criteria apply to the Definition of an Investment provided in Annex 1 of the 2006 and 2016 SADC Protocol on Finance and Investment? An Assessment
by: Lawrence Ngobeni
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Trumping International Investment Law
by: Martin Gronemann -
Arbitration Award of ICSID on the Investment Disputes of Churchill Mining PLC v. Republic of Indonesia
by: Yordan Gunawan
Published: (2017-03-01)