Clinical and economic consequences of ozenoxacin vs. other topical antibiotics for the treatment of impetigo: a real-life study in Spain

Background: Impetigo is a common dermatological paediatric infection that can be treated with topical antibiotics: the common are mupirocin (MUP), fusidic acid (FA) and, most recently, ozenoxacin (OZ). Aim: This study assesses the clinical and economic consequences of the use of OZ vs. MUP and vs....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaime Rodríguez Quintosa, Cintia Cristina Ago, Antoni Sicras Mainar, Renata Villoro, Inés Pérez-Román
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AboutScience Srl 2022-10-01
Series:Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/2439
_version_ 1811237583900901376
author Jaime Rodríguez Quintosa
Cintia Cristina Ago
Antoni Sicras Mainar
Renata Villoro
Inés Pérez-Román
author_facet Jaime Rodríguez Quintosa
Cintia Cristina Ago
Antoni Sicras Mainar
Renata Villoro
Inés Pérez-Román
author_sort Jaime Rodríguez Quintosa
collection DOAJ
description Background: Impetigo is a common dermatological paediatric infection that can be treated with topical antibiotics: the common are mupirocin (MUP), fusidic acid (FA) and, most recently, ozenoxacin (OZ). Aim: This study assesses the clinical and economic consequences of the use of OZ vs. MUP and vs. FA for the treatment of impetigo in routine clinical practice in Spain. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study using real-life data from electronic medical records of patients with impetigo who started treatment with OZ, MUP or FA (maximum follow-up: 3 months; n = 10,974). We compared treatment duration, comorbidities, use of systemic medication, complications, utilization of resources and associated costs across treatments (p<0.05). Cost-effectiveness of OZ was assessed from a social perspective. Complication rates and treatment duration were the effectiveness measures. Results: Mean age was 12.6 (standard deviation [SD]: 16.6) years; 48.6% were male; treatment: 9.3% (OZ), 56.4% (MUP), 34.5% (FA). The percentage of patients ending treatment after 2 weeks was 87.6% (OZ) vs. 83.2% (MUP) vs. 82.4% (FA); p<0.001; complication rates were 1.8% (OZ), 3.3% (MUP) and 3.2% (FA), p<0.001; mean costs were €158 (OZ), €265 (MUP) and €287 (FA), p<0.001. Conclusions: OZ is a cost-effective and dominant alternative for the treatment of impetigo.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T12:26:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-95958a75673c488f94ae2a01b65864c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2284-2403
2283-5733
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T12:26:29Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher AboutScience Srl
record_format Article
series Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
spelling doaj.art-95958a75673c488f94ae2a01b65864c72022-12-22T03:33:09ZengAboutScience SrlGlobal & Regional Health Technology Assessment2284-24032283-57332022-10-019110.33393/grhta.2022.2439Clinical and economic consequences of ozenoxacin vs. other topical antibiotics for the treatment of impetigo: a real-life study in SpainJaime Rodríguez Quintosa0Cintia Cristina Ago1Antoni Sicras Mainar2Renata Villoro3Inés Pérez-Román4Primary Care Center of Olesa de Montserrat, Catalonia - SpainHospital Comarcal del Alt Penedés Garraf, Catalonia - SpainHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Department, Atrys Health, Madrid - SpainHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Department, Atrys Health, Madrid - SpainHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Department, Atrys Health, Madrid - SpainBackground: Impetigo is a common dermatological paediatric infection that can be treated with topical antibiotics: the common are mupirocin (MUP), fusidic acid (FA) and, most recently, ozenoxacin (OZ). Aim: This study assesses the clinical and economic consequences of the use of OZ vs. MUP and vs. FA for the treatment of impetigo in routine clinical practice in Spain. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study using real-life data from electronic medical records of patients with impetigo who started treatment with OZ, MUP or FA (maximum follow-up: 3 months; n = 10,974). We compared treatment duration, comorbidities, use of systemic medication, complications, utilization of resources and associated costs across treatments (p<0.05). Cost-effectiveness of OZ was assessed from a social perspective. Complication rates and treatment duration were the effectiveness measures. Results: Mean age was 12.6 (standard deviation [SD]: 16.6) years; 48.6% were male; treatment: 9.3% (OZ), 56.4% (MUP), 34.5% (FA). The percentage of patients ending treatment after 2 weeks was 87.6% (OZ) vs. 83.2% (MUP) vs. 82.4% (FA); p<0.001; complication rates were 1.8% (OZ), 3.3% (MUP) and 3.2% (FA), p<0.001; mean costs were €158 (OZ), €265 (MUP) and €287 (FA), p<0.001. Conclusions: OZ is a cost-effective and dominant alternative for the treatment of impetigo. https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/2439Cost-effectivenessImpetigoOzenoxacin
spellingShingle Jaime Rodríguez Quintosa
Cintia Cristina Ago
Antoni Sicras Mainar
Renata Villoro
Inés Pérez-Román
Clinical and economic consequences of ozenoxacin vs. other topical antibiotics for the treatment of impetigo: a real-life study in Spain
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Cost-effectiveness
Impetigo
Ozenoxacin
title Clinical and economic consequences of ozenoxacin vs. other topical antibiotics for the treatment of impetigo: a real-life study in Spain
title_full Clinical and economic consequences of ozenoxacin vs. other topical antibiotics for the treatment of impetigo: a real-life study in Spain
title_fullStr Clinical and economic consequences of ozenoxacin vs. other topical antibiotics for the treatment of impetigo: a real-life study in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and economic consequences of ozenoxacin vs. other topical antibiotics for the treatment of impetigo: a real-life study in Spain
title_short Clinical and economic consequences of ozenoxacin vs. other topical antibiotics for the treatment of impetigo: a real-life study in Spain
title_sort clinical and economic consequences of ozenoxacin vs other topical antibiotics for the treatment of impetigo a real life study in spain
topic Cost-effectiveness
Impetigo
Ozenoxacin
url https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/view/2439
work_keys_str_mv AT jaimerodriguezquintosa clinicalandeconomicconsequencesofozenoxacinvsothertopicalantibioticsforthetreatmentofimpetigoareallifestudyinspain
AT cintiacristinaago clinicalandeconomicconsequencesofozenoxacinvsothertopicalantibioticsforthetreatmentofimpetigoareallifestudyinspain
AT antonisicrasmainar clinicalandeconomicconsequencesofozenoxacinvsothertopicalantibioticsforthetreatmentofimpetigoareallifestudyinspain
AT renatavilloro clinicalandeconomicconsequencesofozenoxacinvsothertopicalantibioticsforthetreatmentofimpetigoareallifestudyinspain
AT inesperezroman clinicalandeconomicconsequencesofozenoxacinvsothertopicalantibioticsforthetreatmentofimpetigoareallifestudyinspain