On NFPs with high social impact that avoid concentrating on a few activities [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Background: An influential piece of literature on effective altruism insists that not-for-profit organizations (NFPs) should concentrate their investments on a few activities to maximize their social return on investment (SROI) ratio. However, this creates greater risk for an NFP than building a por...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fuminobu Mizutani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2023-10-01
Series:F1000Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/11-964/v2
_version_ 1827367581286137856
author Fuminobu Mizutani
author_facet Fuminobu Mizutani
author_sort Fuminobu Mizutani
collection DOAJ
description Background: An influential piece of literature on effective altruism insists that not-for-profit organizations (NFPs) should concentrate their investments on a few activities to maximize their social return on investment (SROI) ratio. However, this creates greater risk for an NFP than building a portfolio of investments in activities. This study investigates whether it is desirable for executives and contributors of NFPs to build a portfolio rather than maximize the expected SROI ratio, and if so, how to build one. Solving these questions will help the chief financial officers (CFOs) of NFPs, who serve as their agents, fulfill their obligations to contributors, who are their principals, and will help advisors provide better services for their contributors, their clients. Methods: Data were collected from a ranking of NFPs, then non-parametric tests were performed on this ranking and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). Results: The HHI are between 2013 and 2688. The results of non-parametric tests do not deny that rank and HHI are independent of each other. Most of the NFPs’ investments in activities were in accord with their core competencies. Conclusions: It was found that successful executives build portfolios. The findings of this study should be sufficiently practical in helping NFP executives and contributors decide whether to build portfolios, and if so, how.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:09:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-959932045ad54912a1e249f9cf55cb34
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-1402
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:09:29Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
record_format Article
series F1000Research
spelling doaj.art-959932045ad54912a1e249f9cf55cb342024-02-01T01:00:02ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022023-10-0111157875On NFPs with high social impact that avoid concentrating on a few activities [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]Fuminobu Mizutani0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1306-8891Department of Business Administration, Kanto Gakuin University, Yokohama, 2310016, JapanBackground: An influential piece of literature on effective altruism insists that not-for-profit organizations (NFPs) should concentrate their investments on a few activities to maximize their social return on investment (SROI) ratio. However, this creates greater risk for an NFP than building a portfolio of investments in activities. This study investigates whether it is desirable for executives and contributors of NFPs to build a portfolio rather than maximize the expected SROI ratio, and if so, how to build one. Solving these questions will help the chief financial officers (CFOs) of NFPs, who serve as their agents, fulfill their obligations to contributors, who are their principals, and will help advisors provide better services for their contributors, their clients. Methods: Data were collected from a ranking of NFPs, then non-parametric tests were performed on this ranking and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). Results: The HHI are between 2013 and 2688. The results of non-parametric tests do not deny that rank and HHI are independent of each other. Most of the NFPs’ investments in activities were in accord with their core competencies. Conclusions: It was found that successful executives build portfolios. The findings of this study should be sufficiently practical in helping NFP executives and contributors decide whether to build portfolios, and if so, how.https://f1000research.com/articles/11-964/v2Portfolio NFP SROI HHI Non-parametric test Core competencyeng
spellingShingle Fuminobu Mizutani
On NFPs with high social impact that avoid concentrating on a few activities [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
F1000Research
Portfolio
NFP
SROI
HHI
Non-parametric test
Core competency
eng
title On NFPs with high social impact that avoid concentrating on a few activities [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full On NFPs with high social impact that avoid concentrating on a few activities [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr On NFPs with high social impact that avoid concentrating on a few activities [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed On NFPs with high social impact that avoid concentrating on a few activities [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short On NFPs with high social impact that avoid concentrating on a few activities [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort on nfps with high social impact that avoid concentrating on a few activities version 2 peer review 2 approved
topic Portfolio
NFP
SROI
HHI
Non-parametric test
Core competency
eng
url https://f1000research.com/articles/11-964/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT fuminobumizutani onnfpswithhighsocialimpactthatavoidconcentratingonafewactivitiesversion2peerreview2approved